Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Siberian Journal of Philology
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: Analytical constructions with negative verbs e= and ate= in Udihe

Authors: Anna O. Sagaydachnaya

Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

In the section Linguistics

Issue 2, 2022Pages 220-234
UDK: 811.512.222.1DOI: 10.17223/18137083/79/16

Abstract:

The paper considers two Udihe auxiliary verbs with negative semantics. Also, analytical constructions formed with them and their functioning in the language are examined.

The negative auxiliary verb e= ‘not to do something, not to be’ is the primary tool to express negation analytically. It forms two-component NEG1=TNS=PERS + INF and three-component NEG1=TNS=PERS + MOD=INF + INF analytical constructions. It has tense, mood, and person-number markers. The main verb has the form of infinitive (simple, intentional, or causal). The negative verb e= allows nominal verbal forms with the semantics of purpose and condition to be formed, with analytical constructions of two types being possible: NEG1=NPURP=POSS + INF and NEG1=NCOND=POSS + INF. In this case, the person-number is expressed with personal-attributive markers.

The negative auxiliary verb ate= ~ ata= ʻnot to do something, not to beʼ is used as part of the analytic construction NEG2=PERS + INF. It differs from the verb e- in several features: when forming analytical construction, its morphemic structure has only mood and personal markers, but not temporal. Functioning of ate- differs from e-. Ate- is more often found in the contexts describing situations that imply warnings about the future or categorical impossibility to perform an action in the future. It has been revealed that the use of the negative verb e- and ate- in Udihe is related to modal characteristics of the construction: the verb e= is used in sentences with real modality, while the verb ate= is used in sentences with unreal modality.

Keywords: Udihe language, negation, auxiliary verb e-, auxiliary verb ate-, analytical construction

Bibliography:

Avrorin V. A., Boldyrev B. V. Grammatika orochskogo yazyka [Grammar of the Orochi language]. Novosibirsk, SB RAS Publ. House, 2001, 400 p.

Boldyrev B. V. Evenkiysko-russkiy slovar’ [Evenki-Russian dictionary]. Novosibirsk, SB RAS Publ. House, Geo Branch, 2000, pt 2, 484 p.

Boldyrev B. V. Morfologiya evenkiyskogo yazyka. [Morphology of the Evenki language]. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 2007, 932 p. (Pamyatniki etnicheskoy kul’tury korennykh malochislennykh narodov Severa, Sibiri i Dal’nego Vostoka [Monuments of ethnic culture of indigenous peoples of the North, Siberia and the Far East]; vol. 15)

Kormushin I. V. Udykheyskiy (udegeyskiy) yazyk: Materialy po etnografii. Ocherk fonetiki i grammatiki. Teksty i perevody. Slovar’ [Udyhe (Udeghe) Language. Materials on the ethnic Culture. Phonetics and Grammar. Texts and Translations. Glossary]. Moscow, Nauka, 1998, 320 p.

Nikolaeva I., Tolskaya M. A Grammar of Udihe. Berlin, The Hague, Mouton de Gruyter, 2001.

Ozolinya L. V. Grammatika orokskogo yazyka. [A Grammar of Orok (Uilta)]. Novosibirsk, Geo, 2013, 375 p.

Perekhvalskaya, Elena. Caritive constructions in Udihe: morphology. In: Caritive constructions in the languages of the world. Abstracts of the international conference (Saint Petersburg, online 30 November – 2 December 2020). St. Petersburg, ILS RAS, 2020, pp. 50–56.

Rudnitskaya E. L. Otritsatel’naya ekzistentsial’naya konstruktsiya s āchin / āčin v funktsii karitivnoy v evenkiyskom yazyke: vnutrennyaya sintaksicheskaya struktura [Negative existential construction with āčin in the function of caritive in Evenki language: inner syntactic structure]. In: Caritive constructions in the languages of the world. Abstracts of the international conference (Saint Petersburg, online 30 November – 2 December 2020). St. Petersburg, ILS RAS, 2020, pp. 97–99.

Sravnitel’nyy slovar’ tunguso-manchzhurskikh yazykov [Comparative Dictionary of the Manchu-Tungusic Languages]. Leningrad, Nauka, 1977, vol. 2, 993 p.

Sunik O. P. Glagol v tunguso-man’chzhurskikh yazykakh. Morfologicheskaya struktura i sistema form glagol’nogo slova [Verb in the Tungus-Manchzhur languages. Morphological structure and the system of verb forms]. Moscow, Leningrad, 1962, 365 p.

Trofimova A. O. Poslelogi udegeyskogo yazyka. [Postpositions in Udihe Language]. Novosibirsk, NSU Publ. House, 2009, 156 p.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology