Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Siberian Journal of Philology
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: Conversation analysis approach to the study of speech failures (based on an interview with the First President of Russian Federation B. N. Yeltsin)

Authors: Marina I. Pantykina

Togliatti State University, Togliatti, Russian Federation

In the section Linguistics

Issue 1, 2022Pages 325-339
UDK: 81-13DOI: 10.17223/18137083/78/23

Abstract:

The paper approaches the problem of determining the communicative-linguistic significance of speech failures and discusses related theoretical and methodological issues. The relevance is due to opposing approaches in this area and practically complete cessation of research following the decline in scientific interest in these linguistic phenomena. For the first time, conversation analysis is used to study the problems considered. The interview with the first President of the Russian Federation, Boris Yeltsin, is taken as empirical material. The cognitive capabilities of conversation analysis and its general methodological principles are identified, explaining how the latter allow disclosing the specifics of conversation structure and determining the rules of organizing the exchange of replicas. The basic technology of conversion analysis – transcribing – is introduced. The author analyzes repetitions, pauses, hesitations, clippings of phrases, and expressive intonation selections caused by internal problems of planning and articulation of the speech plan. The conversation analysis of the interview fragments showed how speech disruptions enter into the formation of one of the local contexts – the topic of political confrontation between Yeltsin and Gorbachev. As a result, a conclusion is made that speech failures cannot be considered to be solely speech drawbacks, as they implicitly indicate the goals of communication, are included in the process of forming the structure of the conversation, express the communicative competencies and cognitive attitudes of its participants. Also, further findings concern the possibility of integrating the methodology of conversation analysis with lexical-semantic analysis.

Keywords: B. N. Yeltsin, November Plenum of the Moscow Committee of the CPSU Central Committee, colloquial speech, conversation analysis, method of examples, speech failures

Bibliography:

Baeva E. M. Khezitatsionnye yavleniya v ustnykh monologakh nizkoy stepeni spontannosti [Hesitation phenomena in oral monologues of low spontaneity]. Communication Studies. 2018, no. 1 (15), pp. 75–84. DOI 10.25513/2413-6182.2018.1.75-84

Cameron D. Razgovornyi diskurs. Interpretatsii i praktiki [Working with spoken discourse]. (Y. S. Vovk Transl. from English). Kharkiv, Humanit. Center, 2015, 316 p.

Kipyatkova I. S., Verkhodanova V. O., Ronzhin A. L. Segmentatsiya paralingvisticheskikh fonatsionnykh yavleniy v spontannoy russkoy rechi [Segmentation of paralinguistic phonation phenomena in spontaneous Russian speech]. Perm University Herald. Russian and Foreign Philology. 2012, no. 2 (18), pp. 17–23.

Kuznetsov A. E. Obnaruzhenie khiasticheskoi struktury v spontannom tekste i perspektivy razvitiya etnometodologicheskogo proekta. Stat'ya pervaya [Detection of a Chiastic Structure in a Spontaneous Text and Prospects for the Development of an Ethnomethodological Project. Article One]. Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology. 2017, iss. 1, pp. 97–105. DOI 10.17072/2078-788/2017-1-97-105

Nadeina T. M. Ispol’zovanie intonatsionnoy transkriptsii v tselyakh povysheniya kachestva lingvisticheskikh ekspertiz ustnoy spontannoy rechi [The use of intonational transcription in order to improve the quality of linguistic examinations of oral spontaneous speech]. Voprosy ekspertnoy praktiki. 2019, no. 3, pp. 445–450.

Podlesskaya V. I., Kibrik A. A. Samoispravleniya govoryashchego i drugie tipy rechevykh sboev kak ob”ekt annotirovaniya v korpusakh ustnoi rechi [The speaker’s self-correction and other types of speech malfunctions as an object of annotation in corpuses of oral speech]. Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya informatsiya. Seriya 2. Informatsionnye protsessy i sistemy. 2007, no. 2, pp. 2–23.

Ronzhin A. L., Evgrafova K. V. Analiz variativnosti spontannoi rechi i sposobov ustraneniya rechevykh sboev [Analysis of the variability of spontaneous speech and methods for eliminating speech malfunctions]. News of Higher Schools. Series “Humanities”. 2011, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 227–231.

Rusakova M. V. Elementy antropotsentricheskoi grammatiki russkogo yazyka [Elements of anthropocentric grammar of the Russian language]. Moscow, LRC Publishing House, 2013, 568 p.

Sacks H., Schegloff E. A., Jefferson G. Prosteishaya sistematika organizatsii ocherednosti v razgovore [A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation]. A. M. Korbut (Transl. from English). Russian Sociological Review. 2015, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 142–202.

Shvedova N. Yu. Ocherki po sintaksisu russkoy razgovornoy rechi [Essays on the syntax of Russian colloquial speech]. Moscow, Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences.1960, 377 p.

Stouten F., Duchateau J., Jean-Pierre Martens J.-P. Coping with Disfluencies in Spontaneous Speech Recognition: Acoustic Detection and Linguistic Context Manipulation. Speech Communication. Vol. 48 (11). 2006, pp. 1590–1606.

Tezekbaeva G. A. Spontannaya rech’ kak ob”ekt lingvistiki [Spontaneous speech as an object of linguistics]. Vestnik VSU. Series: Philology. Journalism. 2011, no. 1, pp. 76–79.

Trotsuk I. V. Analiz tekstovykh dannykh v sotsiologii: osnovaniya sistematizatsii kontseptual’nykh modelei, metodologicheskikh printsipov i metodicheskikh reshenii [Analysis of textual data in sociology: the basis for the systematization of conceptual models, methodological principles and methodological solutions]. Dr. philol. sci. diss. Moscow, 2014, 338 p.

Tseytlin S. N. Rechevye sboi kak raznovidnost’ “otritsatel’nogo yazykovogo materiala” [Speech glitches as a kind of “negative language material”]. In: Konferentsiya, posvyashchennaya 150-letiyu kafedry obshchego yazykoznaniya [Conference dedicated to the 150th anniversary of the Department of General Linguistics]. St. Petersburg, SPbSU Publ. House, 2013, pp. 99–101.

Ulanovskii A. M. Fenomenologiya razgovora: metod konversatsionnogo analiza [Phenomenology of conversation: the method of conversion analysis]. Journal of Psycholinguistics. 2016, no. 27, pp. 218–237.

Verkhodanova V. O., Karpov A. A. (2012). Modelirovanie rechevykh sboev v sistemakh avtomaticheskogo raspoznavaniya rechi [Modeling of Speech Failures in Automatic Speech Recognition Systems]. Tomsk State University Journal. 2012, no. 363, pp. 10–15.

Wooffitt R. Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis. A Comparative and Critical Introduction. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delh, SAGE Publications Ltd, 2005, 245 p.

Yakovleva E. B. Rechevye khezitatsii: formal’nyy i funktsional’nyy aspekty: Analiticheskiy obzor [Speech hesitations: formal and functional aspects: An analytical review]. Moscow, Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences, RAS, 2016, 73 p.

Zemskaya E. A., Kitaygorodskaya M. V., Shiryaev E. N. Russkaya razgovornaya rech. Obshchie voprosy yazykoznaniya i sintaksis [Russian colloquial speech. General questions of linguistics and syntax]. Moscow, Nauka, 1981, 275 p.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology