Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Siberian Journal of Philology
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: “Failed life” by Dmitry Grigorovich: towards the pragmatics of the fictional text

Authors: Alexei E. Kozlov

Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation; Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

In the section Study of literature

Issue 1, 2022Pages 48-62
UDK: 821.161.1 + 82.0DOI: .17223/18137083/78/4

Abstract:

In the early 1850s, political processes made the fiction of the journal “Otechestvennye Zapiski” change towards a compromise and numerous agreements between the author, the publisher, and the censor. One example is the story “Failures” (later “Failed life”) by Dmitry Grigorovich, which combines the techniques and ideas of the stories of Nikolai Gogol (“Portrait”) and Fyodor Dostoevsky (“Poor people,” “Weak heart,” “White nights”). In Russian literary criticism, this story is regarded as secondary and imitative, studied mainly in the context of other stories about artists projected onto the everyday life of the drawing classes of the Academy of Arts. This paper shows that while being the key view, such an interpretation cannot be the only one. When discovering a new talent, his ascent and death, one can see the scenario realized by many contemporaries of Grigorovich, notably by Fyodor Dostoevsky. Later, Grigorovich revised the story by changing idioms and narration style to give it a new title: “Failed life.” The revision pragmatics is obvious: “Failures” are more local, marking an episode or a chain of a person’s life (or a set of situations in the fiction plot). “Failed Life” echoes a global catastrophe, with its traces clearly seen in the text of “Literary memoirs” and the writer’s later epistolary.

This paper has been prepared for the 200th anniversary of Grigorovich, whose literary heritage still requires commentary and research reflection. The appendix provides a letter from Dmitry Grigorovich addressed to Andrew Kraevsky, the publisher of “Otechestvennye zapiski”.

Keywords: Russian literature of the XIX century, Grigorovich, Dostoevsky, Kraevsky, stories about artists, secondary and alternative

Bibliography:

Akimova N. N. Khudozhnik v russkoy belletristike epokhi romantizma [The artist in Russian fiction of the era of romanticism]. Nauchnye trudy SWorld. 2015, no. 35, pp. 118–138.

Ashcheulova I. V. Fenomen tvorcheskoy neudachi [The phenomenon of creative failure. A. V. Podchinenov and T. A. Snigireva (Eds.). Yekaterinburg, UrFU Publ., 2011, 424 p.]. Siberian Journal of Philology. 2012, no. 4, pp. 227–231.

Belov S. V., Tunimanov V. A. A. G. Dostoevskaya i ee vospominaniya [Anna Dostoevskaya and her memoirs]. In: Dostoevskaya A. G. Vospominaniya [Memoirs]. Moscow, Khudozh. lit., 1971, pp. 7–31.

Bodrova A. S. Izdatel’skaya ekonomika A. A. Kraevskogo v kontse 1850-kh – nachale 1860-kh godov [Publishing economy of A. A. Kraevsky in the late 1850s – early 1860s]. In: Skladchina: Sb. st. k 50-letiyu professora M. S. Makeeva [Skladchina: Coll. art. to the 50th anniversary of Professor M. S. Makeev]. Moscow, 2019, pp. 27–51.

Bogoderova A. A. Syuzhetnaya situatsiya ukhoda v russkoy literature vtoroy poloviny XIX veka [The plot situation of departure in Russian literature of the second half of the 19th century]. Cand. philol. sci. diss. Novosibirsk, 2011.

Brunson M. Russian Realisms: Literature and Painting, 1840–1890. DeKalb, Northern Illinois Uni. Press, 2016, 282 p.

Dmitrenko S. Belletristika porodila klassiku (k probleme interpretatsii literaturnykh proizvedeniy) [Fiction gave birth to the classics (to the problem of interpreting literary works)]. Voprosy literatury. 2002, no. 5, pp. 75–102.

Evgen’ev-Maksimov V. E. “Sovremennik” v 40–50-e gody “Sovremennik” in the 40–50s]. Leninigrad, 1934.

Fenomen tvorcheskoy neudachi [The Phenomenon of Creative Failure]. A. V. Podchinenov, T. A. Snigireva (Eds.). 2nd ed. rev. and suppl. Moscow, Yurayt, 2018, 484 p.

Fenomen tvorcheskoy neudachi [The Phenomenon of Creative Failure]. A. V. Podchinenov, T. A. Snigireva (Eds.). Yekaterinburg, UrFU Publ., 2011, 424 p.

Kiseleva L. N. Roman kak vozmozhnaya / ideal’naya model’ avtobiografii [The novel as a possible / ideal model of autobiography]. In: Semiotika povedeniya i literaturnye strategii: Lotmanovskie chteniya – XXII [Semiotics of behavior and literary strategies: Lotman readings – XXII]. Moscow, 2017, pp. 240–255.

Kozlov A. E. “Dvoynik” F. M. Dostoevskogo i “Dvoynik” N. D. Akhsharumova: k voprosu o lingvostilevoy organizatsii vtorichnogo teksta “Double” by F. M. Dostoevsky and “Double” by N. D. Akhsharumov: To the question of the linguistic and stylistic organization of the secondary text]. Siberian Journal of Philology. 2017, pp. 36–45, no. 1. DOI 10.17223/18137083/58/4

Lotman Yu. M. Istoriya i tipologiya russkoy kul’tury [History and typology of Russian culture]. St. Petersburg, Iskusstvo, 2002, 768 p.

Makeev M. Nikolay Nekrasov: poet i predprinimatel’ (ocherki o vzaimodeystvii literatury i ekonomiki) [Nikolay Nekrasov: Poet and Entrepreneur (Essays on the Interaction of Literature and Economics)]. Moscow, 2009, 236 p.

Meshcheryakov V. P. Grigorovich: pisatel’ i iskusstvoved [Grigorovich: writer and art critic]. Moscow, 1985, 169 p.

Pecherskaya T. I., Nikanorova E. K. Syuzhety i motivy russkoy klassicheskoy literatury: Ucheb. posobie [Plots and motifs of Russian classical literature: Textbook]. Novosibirsk, 2010.

Ponomareva A. A. Literaturnye syuzhetnye kody v belletristike 1850-kh godov [Literary plot codes in fiction of the 1850s]. Cand. philol. sci. diss. Novosibirsk, 2017.

Proskurina V. Yu. Literaturnaya pozitsiya zhurnala “Sovremennik” [Literary position of the journal “Sovremennik”]. Cand. philol. sci. diss. Moscow, 1985, 308 p.

Stepina M. Yu. K atributsii “Rasskazov o zhiteyskikh glupostyakh” v nekrasovskom “Sovremennike” [On the attribution of “Stories about everyday nonsense” in Nekrasov’s “Sovremennik”]. Russkaya Literatura. 1995, no. 2, pp. 153–162.

Vinokur G. O. Biografiya i kul’tura. Russkoe stsenicheskoe proiznoshenie [Biography and culture. Russian stage pronunciation]. Moscow, Russkie slovari, 1997, 174 p.

Voloshina S. M. Nekrasov i Kraevskiy: redaktorskaya politika i kommertsiya [Nekrasov and Kraevsky: editorial policy and commerce]. In: “Razumnoe, dobroe, vechnoe…”: problemy proizvodstva, sokhraneniya i rasprostraneniya kul’tury v Rossii ot nekrasovskoy epokhi do sovremennosti (usad’ba, literatura, muzey) [“Reasonable, good, eternal...”: problems of production, preservation and distribution of culture in Russia from the Nekrasov era to the present (manor, literature, museum)]. Yaroslavl, 2017, pp. 21–26.

Zenkin S. N. Naturshchitsa i shedevr (Bal’zak i ego prodolzhateli) [Model and masterpiece (Balzac and his followers)]. Studia Litterarum. 2018, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 10–57. DOI 10.22455/2500-4247-2018-3-1-10-57

Grigorovich D. V. Literaturnye vospominaniya [Literary memoirs] G. G. Elizavetina (Ed.). Moscow, Khud. lit., 1987, 333 p.

Grigorovich D. V. Neudachi [Failures ]. Otechestvennye zapiski. 1850, no. 9, pp. 1–171.

Dostoevskaya A. G. Vospominaniya [Memories]. Moscow, Khud. lit., 1971.

Druzhinin A. V. Pis’ma inogorodnego podpischika v redaktsiyu “Sovremennika” o russkoy zhurnalistike [Letters of a nonresident subscriber to the editorial board of Sovremennik about Russian journalism]. Sovremennik. 1850, no. 10, pp. 198–225.

Edelson E. N. “Otechestvennye zapiski” v 1850 godu. Moskvityanin. 1851, no. 1, pp. 129–145.

National Library of Russia. Manuscripts Department. Fund 222. Item number 8. Pis’mo M. M. Dostoevskogo D. V. Grigorovichu. 1 iyulya 1850-go goda [Letter from M. M. Dostoevsky to D. V. Grigorovich. July 1, 1850]; Item number 14. Pis’mo

M. P. Pogodina D. V. Grigorovichu. sentyabr’ 1851-go goda [Letter from M. P. Pogodin to D. V. Grigorovich. September 1851]; Fund 391. Item number 300. Pis’mo

D. V. Grigorovicha A. A. Kraevskomu, bez daty 1850-go goda [Letter from D. Grigorovich to A. A. Kraevsky, undated 1850]; Pis’mo D. V. Grigorovicha A. A. Kraevskomu. 28 aprelya 1852-go goda [Letter from D. V. Grigorovich to A. A. Kraevsky. 28 April 1852]; Pis’mo D. V. Grigorovicha A. A. Kraevskomu, bez daty 1856-go goda [Letter of D. V. Grigorovich to A. A. Kraevsky, undated 1856].

Pis’ma russkikh pisateley k A. S. Suvorinu. Materialy po istorii russkoy nauki, literatury i obshchestvennosti [Letters of Russian writers to A. S. Suvorin. Materials on the history of Russian science, literature and society]. Leningrad, Izd. GPB, 1927.

Vokrug romana “Proselochnye dorogi”: perepiska D. V. Grigorovicha i A. A. Kraevskogo 1850–1852 godov [Around the novel "Country Roads": correspondence of D. V. Grigorovich and A. A. Krajewski in 1850–1852]. Russkaya Literatura. 2022, no. 1. DOI 10.31860/ 0131-6095-2022-2

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology