Article

Name: «I know the power of words...» or the metapoetics of the poetry «An order to the army of art» of V. Mayakovsky (on the 125th anniversary of the poet’s birth)

Authors: Valentina E. Golovchiner, Alinda V. Herber

Tomsk State Pedagogical University, Tomsk, Russian Federation

In the section Study of literature

Abstract: The present work studies for the first time the poetics of the poem «Prikaz po armii iskusstva» («An order to the army of art»). It reveals a complex of images which is developed in the subsequent works by Mayakovsky on the theme of a poet and poetry. In the metaphor «the army of arts», Vladimir Mayakovsky uses the semantic potential of speeches about outstanding writers, artists: «he won trust and sympathy», «won the love of readers and spectators». Comparing the army forces being used to protect the native territory and seize the enemy’s one, Mayakovsky considers «hearts and souls» of people to be the territory to which the creative energy is directed. «The army of arts» and other army semantics images are interpreted in the poem as metasigns expressing the poet’s constant idea of uniting the efforts of artists and power of their creativity effect on people. It is specified by the logic of mentioning tools, devices of artistic expression in the sphere of arts (sounds, letters, a song, pianos, brushes, palettes) in the poem; they act as a specific weapon – means by which the artists of different arts conquer human «hearts and souls». The stability and importance of army semantics for Mayakovsky are seen in the perspective of its development, including the metapoetics of the poem «Vo ves’ golos» («At the top of the voice»). The paper presents the authors’ understanding of terms metapoetics, metasign, and metastructure.

Keywords: V. Mayakovsky, «An order to the army of art», metapoetics, metasign, metastructure, metaphoricalness, army semantics, artistic expression, chastooshka, riddle

Bibliography:

Blok A. A. Sobranie sochineniy: V 6 t. [Collected works: in 6 vols]. Moscow, Pravda, 1971, Vol. 3.

Golovchiner V. E. Epicheskaya drama v russkoy literature XX veka [Epic drama in Russian literature of the 20th century]. Tomsk, TSPU publ., 2007, 318 p.

Gorb V. Shut u trona revoliutsii [A fool at the revolution throne]. Moscow, Uliss-media, 2001, 610 p.

Kantor K. M. Trinadtsatyy apostol [The thirteenth apostle]. Moscow, 2008, 368 p.

Katanyan V. A. Mayakovskiy: khronika zhizni i deyatel’nosti [Mayakovsky: a chronicle of life and work]. Moscow, Sov. pisatel’, 1985, 648 p.

Khatyamova M. A. Formy literaturnoy samorefleksii v russkoy proze pervoy treti XX v. [Forms of literary self-reflection in Russian prose of the first third of the 20th century]. Moscow, LRC Publ. House, 2008, 328 p.

Kiselev V. S. Metatekst kak tip khudozhestvennogo tselogo (k postanovke problemy) [Metatext as a type of artistic whole (to the formulation of the problem)]. Tomsk State University Journal. 2004, no. 282, pp. 184–190.

Kvyatkovskiy A. P. Poeticheskiy slovar’ [Poetic dictionary]. Moscow, RSUH, 2013, 584 p.

Mayakovskiy V. V. Sobranie sochineniy: V 12 t. [Collected works: in 12 vols]. Moscow, Pravda, 1978.

Platonov A. Razmyshleniya chitatelya [Reflections of the reader]. Moscow, Sovremennik, 1980, 287 p.

Russkaya literatura v XX veke: imena, problemy, kul’turnyy dialog. Vyp. 6: Formy samorefleksii literatury XX veka: metateksty i metatekstovye struktury [Russian literature in the 20th century: names, problems, cultural dialogue. Iss. 6: Forms of self-reflection in the literature of the 20th century: metatetexts and metatext structures]. Tomsk, 2004.

Russkiy futurizm [Russian futurism]. Moscow, IMLI RAN, Nasledie, 2000, 479 p.

Sirotkin N. S. Zhanr “prikaza” v avangardistskoy poezii (futurizm i levy ekspressionizm) [The genre of “order” in avant-garde poetry (futurism and left expressionism)]. Philological Sciences. 2001, no. 4.

Shtayn E. Metapoetika – razmytaya paradigma [Metapoetics – fuzzy paradigm]. Philological Sciences. 2007, no. 6, pp. 41–50.

Yakobson R. O. O pokolenii, rastrativshem svoikh poetov [About the generation which has given away with its poets]. Voprosy literatury. 1990, no. 6 (Nov.-Dec.), pp. 73–98.