Article

Name: Referential statuses of a subject and temporal non-localization in Russian proverbs: peculiarities of interaction

Authors: Svetlana I. Pervunina

Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

In the section Linguistics

Abstract:

The paper investigates the interaction between referential statuses among subjects within the temporally static contexts characteristic of proverbs. The objective is to delineate and elucidate the particular characteristics of the relationship between a form of temporal non-localization known as supertemporality and referential ranking of subjects in Russian proverbial expressions. The source material for this study consists of proverbs drawn from the collection of Vladimir Dal. A categorically oriented situational analysis of proverbs reveals the interplay between their supertemporal aspect and the universal/generic status of their subjects. The characterization of typical situations within proverbs with the universal status of the subject is found to be achieved through distinct structural means: discrete constructions (two-part sentences with pronouns such as “everyone” or “nobody,” and others) and non-discrete constructions (single-part sentences and others). The cases of incomplete coverage of the subjects, classified as universal, within conditional constructions are noted. The attribution of generic status to subjects within the supertemporal aspect, together with the expansion of characteristics to specific groups of individuals (gender, age, social class, nationality, and others), is considered reasonable. The analysis not only examines the basic type but also investigated the adaptability of class boundaries, taking into account conditional indicators and the usage of pronouns, particles, and other relevant elements. A correlation is identified between the referential status of subjects and certain forms of supertemporality. The universal status correlates with the potential timelessness of intended actions, while the generic status correlates with situations of obligatory and potential qualitativity.

Keywords: reference, Russian proverbs, referential types of subjects, temporal non-localization, supertemporality

Bibliography:

Arutyunova N. D. Yazyk i mir cheloveka [Language and the human world]. Moscow, LRC Publishing House, 1999, 896 р.

Bondarko A. V. Kategorizatsiya v sisteme grammatiki [Categorization in the system of grammar]. Moscow, LRC Publishing House, 2011, 488 p.

Bondarko A. V. Sub”ektno-predikatno-ob”ektnye situatsii [Subject-predicate-object situations]. In: Teoriya funktsional’noy grammatiki. Sub”ektnost’. Ob”ektnost’. Kommunikativnaya perspektiva vyskazyvaniya. Opredelennost’ / neopredelennost’ [Functional grammar theory. Subjectivity. Objectivity. Communicative perspective of an utterance. Certainty. Uncertainty]. St. Petersburg, Nauka, 1992, pp. 29–71.

Bondarko A. V. Teoriya funktsional’noy grammatiki: Vvedenie, aspektual’nost’, vremennaya lokalizovannost’, taksis [Functional grammar theory: Introduction, aspectuality, temporal localization, taxis]. Moscow, 2017, Lenand, 352 p.

Bulygina T. V. K postroeniyu tipologii predikatov v russkom yazyke [Toward the construction of predicate typology in Russian]. In: Semanticheskie tipy predikatov [Semantic types of predicates]. Moscow, Nauka, 1982, pp. 7–85.

D’yachkova N. A. Polipropozitivnye struktury v sfere prostogo predlozhenii [Poly-propositional structures in simple sentences]. Ekaterinburg, UrSU, 2001, 259 р.

Frolova O. E. Mir, stoyashchiy za tekstom: referentsial’nye mekhanizmy poslovitsy, anekdota, volshebnoy skazki i avtorskogo povestvovatel’nogo khudozhestvennogo teksta [The world behind the text: referential mechanisms of a proverb, joke, fairy tale, and author’s narrative literary text]. Moscow, LKI, 2007, 317 р.

Katsyuba L. B. Litso glagola v russkikh poslovitsakh. Semantiko-grammaticheskie i lingvokul’turologicheskie aspekty [The person of the verb in Russian proverbs. Semantic grammatical and linguistic and cultural aspects]. Moscow, Flinta, 2018, 214 p.

Linsky L. Referring. New York, Humanities Press, 1967, 139 p.

Paducheva E. V. Narechie kak kvantornoe slovo [Adverb as a quantifier word]. Izv. AN SSSR. Seriya literatury i yazyka. 1989, vol. 48, no 1, pp. 26–37.

Paducheva E. V. Vyskazyvanie i ego sootnesennost’ s deystvitel’nost’yu: Referentsial’nye aspekty semantiki mestoimeniy [Expression and its correlation with reality: Referential aspects of the semantics of pronouns]. Moscow, LKI, 2010, 296 р.

Pervunina S. I. Osobennosti referentsii sub”ektov v russkikh poslovitsakh s formami tret’ego litsa [Peculiarities of Subject Reference in Russian Proverbs with Third Person Forms]. Tomsk State University Journal. 2024b, no. 499, pp. 41–48.

Pervunina S. I. Sposoby referentsial’nogo ranzhirovaniya sub"ektov v russkikh poslovitsakh s formami vtorogo litsa edinstvennogo chisla [Ways of Referential Ranking of Subjects in Russian Proverbs with Forms of the Second Person Singular]. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2024a, no. 4, pp. 50–58.

Smirnov I. N. Vyrazhenie povtoryaemosti i obobshchennosti deystviya v sovremennom russkom yazyke [Expression of repetition and generalization of action in the modern Russian language]. St. Petersburg, Nauka, SAGA, 2008, 160 p.

Shmelev A. D. Russkiy yazyk i vneyazykovaya deystvitel’nost’ [Russian language and extra-linguistic reality]. Moscow, LRC Publishing House, 2002, 483 р.

Shuvalova I. E. Semantika russkikh mestoimeniy [Semantics of Russian pronouns]. Kursk, Kursk State University Publ., 2007, 143 p.