Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Siberian Journal of Philology
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: Adversative passive from motion verbs in Kazym Khanty

Authors: Muravyev N. A.

National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russian Federation

In the section Linguistics

Issue 2, 2022Pages 201-219
UDK: 811.511.14DOI: 10.17223/18137083/79/15

Abstract:

Passive voice in Northern Khanty is a productive inflectional verbal category which marks rearrangement in communicative roles of core event participants. A special feature of Khanty passive is its compatibility not only with transitive but also with intransitive verbs and, in particular, with verbs of motion. This study examines the passive voice construction with intransitive motion verbs in the Kazym dialect of Northern Khanty, with the data source being a survey of the speakers living in Kazym village, Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug, Russian Federation (20192020). The aim was to describe the mechanism of motion passivization and to explain the properties underlying the motion and its participants compared with the standard passive construction. It has been revealed that the passive construction of motion verbs is compatible only with goal-oriented motion verbs, i.e. verbs with the meaning of ‘arrival’, ‘coming in’, ‘coming out’ and ‘falling’ and not with other path verbs denoting ‘going’, ‘coming down’ or manner verbs meaning ‘flying’, ‘running’. Syntactically, this construction promotes the goal participant to subject position. Semantically, it raises the animate possessor of the goal which is affected by the motion event and demotes the subject of motion, which is an overtly expressed indefinite or non-referential entity and the source of the effect produced on the possessor of the goal. Typologically Khanty motion passive is similar to adversative passive constructions in Even and Japanese. However, it is less grammaticalized and more lexically restricted and, thus, might be regarded as an intermediate stage of development of such categories.

Keywords: passive voice, motion verbs, possessor, adversative, Finno-Ugric languages, Khanty

Bibliography:

Cheremisina M. I., Solovar V. N. Zalogovost’, perekhodnost’, pryamoy ob”ekt v yazykakh raznykh sistem [Voice, transitivity, direct object in different language systems].In: Yazyki narodov Sibiri: grammaticheskie issledovaniya: Sb. st. [E. I. Ubryatova, M. I. Cheremisina]. (Eds in Ch.). Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1991, pp. 66–84.

Daniel M. Towards a typology of personal locatives. Problem setting. In: Talk at The Fifth International Conference of the Association for Linguistic Typology (ALT V). Cagliari, September 15–18, 2003.

Filchenko A. Continuity of information structuring strategies in Eastern Khanty. In: Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations. A crosslinguistic typology. P. Suihkonen, B. Comrie, V. Solovyev (Eds.). Amsterdam, John Benjamins, 2012, pp. 115–131.

Filchenko A. Non-canonical agent-marking in Eastern Khanty: A functional-pragmatic perspective. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics. 2005, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 29–40.

Honti L. Chrestomathia ostiacica. Budapest, Tankönyvkiadó, 1986, 285 p.

Kaksin A. D. Kazymskiy dialekt khantyyskogo yazyka [Kazym dialect of Khanty]. 2nd ed. Khanty-Mansiysk: Obsko-Ugorsky Institute for Applied Research and Development, 2010, 176 p.

Kortlandt F. On the meaning of the Japanese passive. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia. 1992, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 97–108.

Koshkareva N. B. Kommunikativnaya paradigma khantyyskogo predlozheniya [A communicative paradigm of Khanty sentence]. In: Yazyki korennykh narodov Sibiri: Sb. st. [Languages of the indigenous peoples of Siberia: Coll. of arts.]. B. Koshkareva, I. V. Oktyabr’skaya (Eds)., Novosibirsk, 2002, pp. 29–44.

Koshkareva N. B., Solovar V. N. Uvty muy ўvty: kurs prakticheskoy fonetiki khantyyskogo yazyka (kazymskiy dialekt) [Uvty mui uvty: a course of practical phonetics of the Khanty language (Kazym dialect)]. Novosibirsk, Geo, 2007, 178 p.

Kulonen U. M. The Passive in Ob-Ugrian. Helsinki, Finno-Ugrian Society, 1989, 332 p.

Malchukov A. L. The syntax and semantics of adversative constructions in Even. GENGO KENKYU (Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan). 1993, vol. 103, pp. 1–36.

Mikhaylov S. K. Pochemu khantyyskie imena nuzhdayutsya v opredelennom artikle? [Why do Khanty names need a definite article?]. In: Tez. 15 Konferentsii po tipologii i grammatike dlya molodykh issledovateley (Sankt-Peterburg, 22–24 noyabrya 2018 g.) [Proc. of 15 Conference on Typology and Grammar for Young Researchers (St. Petersburg, 22-24 November 2018)]. D. F. Mishhenko (Ed.). St. Petersburg, ILS RAS, 2018, pp. 79–81.

Mithun M. The evolution of noun incorporation. Language. 1984, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 847–894.

Mymrina D. F. Aktivnaya i passivnaya konstruktsii v khantyyskom yazyke [Active and passive constructions in Khanty]. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2005, no. 4, pp. 95–98.

Rakhilina E. V. There and Back: The Case of Russian ‘go’. GLOSSOS. 2004, vol. 5, pp. 1–33.

Shibatani M. An integrational approach to possessor raising, ethical datives, and adversative passives. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. 1994, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 461–486.

Shibatani M. On the conceptual framework for voice phenomena. Linguistics. 2006, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 217–269.

Solovar V. N. Statal’nye elementarnye prostye predlozheniya s passivnymi formami glagol’nogo skazuemogo v kazymskom dialekte khantyyskogo yazyka [Statal elementary simple sentences with passive verbal predicate forms in Kazym Khanty]. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology, 2010, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 91–98.

Talmy L. Semantic Structures in English and Atsugewi. PhD Diss. Berkeley, University of California, 1972.

Talmy L. Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In: Language Typology and Syntactic Description. T. Shopen (Ed.). Cambridge Uni. Press, 1985, vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, pp. 57–149.

Traugott E. C. Toward a coherent account of grammatical constructionalization. In: Diachronic construction grammar. J. Barðdal, E. Smirnova, L. Sommerer, S. Gildea (Eds.). Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publ., 2015, vol. 18, pp. 51–79.

Virtanen S. Transitivity in Eastern Mansi: An information structural approach. PhD Diss. University of Helsinki, 2015.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology