Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Siberian Journal of Philology
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: Text universals as a theoretical concept

Authors: Yuri V. Shatin, Igor E. Kim, Igor V. Silantev

Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Science,s Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

In the section Study of literature

Issue 4, 2021Pages 37-48
UDK: 821DOI: 10.17223/18137083/77/3

Abstract: The universals of the artistic language are fundamentally different from the universals of other language systems. The artistic language itself is opposed to both the so-called “natural” languages and artificial systems since it acts as a secondary modeling system resulting from the removal of such universals inherent in ordinary speech as automatism in the use of already existing statements, an orientation towards ease of understanding, etc. Secondary modeling systems are immanent, unique, and exclusive in each case. The paradox of the universals of the artistic language is that its code uniqueness is created anew every time and does not depend on the thematic content of the statement. At relatively late stages of development, the artistic language creates specific universals that are fundamentally impossible in other language systems. The most significant universal of artistic language is the presence of two co-opposed speech systems – verse and prose – in their various ratios, depending on the genre and direction. A more complex case can be observed in folklore and early literature, where syncretic forms predominate. The universals of the artistic language, as a rule, turn out to be closely tied to the artistic text. The article identifies five pairs of oppositions that claim to be called universals of a literary text: repetition – contrast, symmetry – asymmetry, background – figure, one’s own – someone else’s, discrete – continuous.

Keywords: universals, artistic language, literature, repetition, contrast, symmetry, asymmetry, background, figure, own, alien, discrete, continuous

Bibliography:

Belyy A. Ritm kak dialektika i “Mednyy vsadnik” [Rhythm as a dialectic and the Bronze Horseman]. Moscow, 1929, 280 p.

Bondarko L. V. Zvukovoy stroy sovremennogo russkogo yazyka: ucheb. posobiye dlya stud. ped. in-tov po spetsial’nosti “Rus. yaz. i literatura” [Sound structure of the modern Russian language: textbook for the students of pedagogical institutes, specializing in Russian language and literature]. MOSCOW, 1977, 175 p.

Brazgovskaya E. E. Semiotika yazyka i kody kul’tury [Semiotics of language and codes of culture]. Moscow, Yurayt, 2019, 186 p.

Bulanin L. L. Fonetika sovremennogo russkogo yazyka [Phonetics of the Modern Russian language]. Moscow, Vyssh. shk., 1970, 206 p.

Dostoyevskiy F. M. Poln. sobr. soch.: V 30 t. [Complete Works: In 30 vols]. Leningrad, 1972, vol. 1.

Florenskiy P. A. Analiz prostranstvennosti i vremennosti v khudozhestvenno-izobrazitel’nykh proizvedeniyakh [Analysis of spatiality and temporality in works of art]. Moscow, 1993, 330 p.

Kluckhohn C. Universal’nyye kategorii kul’tury [Universal categories of culture]. Issues of social theory. Scientific almanac. Moscow, 2009, vol. 3, iss. 1 (3), pp. 7–31.

Kovtunova I. I. Sovremennyy russkiy yazyk: Poryadok slov i aktual'noye chleneniye predlozheniya [Modern Russian: Word order and actual division of the sentence]. Moscow, 1976, 240 p.

Mandel’shtam O. E. Poln. sobr. stikhotvoreniy [Complete collection of poems]. St. Petersburg, 1995, 724 p.

Panov M. V. Russkaya fonetika. Uchebnik dlya universitetov [Russian phonetics. A textbook for universities]. Moscow, 1967, 440 p.

Plotkin V. Ya. Tipologicheskaya rekonstruktsiya dinamiki indoyevropeyskoy fono-

logicheskoy sistemy [Typological Reconstruction of the Indo-European phonological system dynamics]. Izvestiya AN SSSR. Otdeleniye literatury i yazyka. 1978, vol. 37, iss. 5, pp. 393–399.

Reformatskiy A. A. Kompressivno-allegrovaya rech’ (v svyazi s situatsiyey govoreniya) [Compression-allegroic speech (in connection with the situation of speaking)]. In: Zvukovoy stroy yazyka [Sound structure of the language]. Moscow, 1979, pp. 244–251.

Sharandin A. L. problema sloga i solgorazdela v russkom yazyke [Problem of syllable and syllable division in Russian language]. Tambov University Review. Series Humanities. 2005, vol. 1 (37), pp. 67–78.

Shklovskiy V. B. Voskreshenie slova [Resurrection of the word]. In: Shklovskiy V. B. Gamburgskiy schet: Stat’i – vospominaniya – esse (1914–1933) [The Hamburg account: Articles – Memoirs – Essays (1914–1933)]. Moscow, Sov. pisatel’, 1990, pp. 36–72.

Stockwell P. Cognitive Poetics. N. Y., 2002, 204 p.

Veselovskiy A. N. Istoricheskaya poetika [Historical poetics]. Leningrad, 1940.

Wölfflin H. Osnovnyye ponyatiya istorii iskusstv [Basic concepts of art history]. St. Petersburg, 1994, 244 p.

Yampol’skiy M. Izobrazheniye. Kurs lektsiy [Image. Lecture course]. Moscow, 2018, 972 p.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology