Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
DOI: 10.25205/2410-7883
Roskomnadzor certificate number Эл № ФС 77-84792 
 
Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya (Studies in Theory of Literary Plot and Narratology)
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
Our ethical principles
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Editorial Office Address: Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of the RAS. 8 Nikolaeva St, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation; zhurnal.syuzhet@yandex.ru +7-(383)-330-47-72

Article

Name: Notes to the Study of the Oedipus Plot (Issues of Genesis, Evolution, Typology)

Authors: Margarita N. Klimova

Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russian Federation

In the section The Plot in Literature and Folklore

Issue 2, 2021Pages 16-31
UDK: 82: 821.161.1DOI: 10.25205/2410-7883-2021-2-16-31

Abstract: The Oedipus plot, which is based on the fate of an involuntary parricide and incestor, is one of the most famous in world literature and folklore. Various scientists from historians and ethnographers to psychoanalysts have tried to explain the story of Oedipus plot and incest as its plot-forming motif, but only interdisciplinary research can help to properly understand and adequately describe this “multi-layered” and time-varying phenomenon. Reflecting on V. Ya. Propp’s classic work “Oedipus in the Light of Folklore” (1944), the author of the article offers his own experience of the structural analysis of the famous plot, unfinished by his predecessor-folklorist due to the struggle against “formalism”. The typology of plot processing, proposed by Propp, also needs historical explicitation, due to the Propp’s timeless approach to the analyzed materials, which does not allow judging its evolution. Meanwhile, the Oedipus plot has passed through several stages in its development. Its archaic basis reflected the historical struggle of different forms of succession in a fabulous way. The story of Oedipus, which became one of the examples of the irresistible power of fate for ancient consciousness, found its ethical dimension in the tragedies of Sophocles. In the Middle Ages it was reinterpreted in the spirit of the Christian doctrine of repentance and absolution, becoming the basis of a number of legends about “sinful saints”, but later it lost relevance against the background of the Catholic trade in indulgences and the development of the idea of pre-destination among Protestants. A particular understudied stage in the evolution of the Oedipus plot is the period of its existence in Russia. It came to the Eastern Slavs through Polish media-tion only at the end of the Middle Ages in several versions at once and is represented in the Russian manuscript tradition by a group of “stories about an incestor”. These stories were actively rewritten for three centuries, went into East Slavic folklore and were reflected in the works of new Russian literature.

Keywords: international plots, Oedipus plot, incest, archaic succession forms, Christianity and literature, Old Russian literature, comparativisties

Bibliography:

Averintsev S. S. K istolkovaniyu simvoliki mifa ob Edipe [To the interpretation of the symbolism of the myth of Oedipus]. In: Antichnost’ i sovremennost’: K 80-letiyu F. A. Petrovskogo [Antiquity and modernity: To the 80th anniversary of F. A. Petrovsky]. Moscow, 1972, pp. 90–102. (in Russ.)

Burykin A. A. Edip v svete etnografii. Khantyyskie skazki i drevnegrecheskiy mif [Oedipus in the light of ethnography. Khanty Tales and Ancient Greek Myth]. Bulletin of Ugric Studies, 2014, no. 3 (18), pp. 17–27. (in Russ.)

Ellstein Y. The Gregorius Legend: Its Versions and Its Metamorphosis in the Hassidic Tale. Fabula, 1986. Bd. 27, Ht. 3–4, S. 195–215.

Gorelov N. “Edip v svete fol’klora” cherez pyat’desyat let [“Oedipus in the light of folklore” in fifty years]. In: Kunstkamera: Etnograficheskie tetradi [Kunstkamera: Ethnographic notebooks]. St. Petersburg, 1995, iss. 8–9, pp. 323–326. (in Russ.)

Grabar-Passek M. E. Srednevekovaya latinskaya poema o Pontii Pilate [Medieval Latin Poem about Pontius Pilate]. In: Antichnost’ i sovremennost’: K 80-letiyu F. A. Petrovskogo [Antiquity and Modernity: To the 80th Anniversary F. A. Petrovsky]. Moscow, 1972, pp. 410–417. (in Russ.)

Graves R. Mify Drevney Gretsii [Myths of Ancient Greece]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1992, 620 p. (in Russ.)

Gudziy N. K. K legendam o Iude Predatele i Andree Kritskom [To the legends about Judas the Traitor and Andrew of Crete]. Russian Philological Bulletin (Warsaw), 1915, no. 1, pp. 3–304. (in Russ.)

Istoki russkoy belletristiki: Vozniknovenie zhanrov syuzhetnogo povestvovaniya v drevnerusskoy literature [The origins of Russian fiction: The emergence of genres of storytelling in ancient Russian literature]. Leningrad, Nauka, 1970, 597 p. (in Russ.)

Klimova M. N. Osobaya redaktsiya Skazaniya Ieronima o Iude Predatele [A special edition of the Legend of Jerome about Judas the Traitor]. In: Obshchestvennoe soznanie, knizhnost’, literatura perioda feodalizma [Public consciousness, booklore, literature of the period of feudalism]. Novosibirsk, 1990, pp. 123–128. (in Russ.)

Klimova M. N. Velikiy kanon Andreya Kritskogo kak istochnik ego apokrifiche- skogo zhitiya [The Great Canon of Andrew of Crete as a source of his apocryphal life]. In: Obshchestvennoe soznanie naseleniya Rossii po otechestvennym narrativnym is- tochnikam XVI–XX vv. [Public consciousness of the population of Russia according to domestic narrative sources of the 16th – 20th centuries]. Novosibirsk, 2006. pp. 107–117. (in Russ.)

Kniga Iudy [The Book of Judas]. An Anthology. St. Petersburg, Amphora Publ., 2006, 430 p. (in Russ.)

Kroes H. W. J. Die Gregoriuslegende. Neophilologus, 1954, no. 38, S. 169–175.

Levinton G. A. Intsest [Incest]. In: Mify narodov mira [Myths of the peoples of the world]. Encyclopedia. In 2 vols. Moscow, 1980, vol. 1, pp. 545–547. (in Russ.)

Mezhdu Edipom i Ozirisom: stanovlenie psikhoanaliticheskoy kontseptsii mifa [Be-tween Oedipus and Osiris: The Rise of the Psychoanalytic Concept of Myth]. Lvov, Moscow, 1998, 512 p. (in Russ.)

Nazarevskiy A. A. Bibliografiya drevnerusskoy povesti [Bibliography of the Old Russian story]. Moscow, Leningrad, AS USSR Publ., 1955, 192 p. (in Russ.)

Propp V. Ya. Fol’klor i deystvitel’nost’: Izbrannye stat’i [Folklore and reality: Selected articles]. Moscow, Nauka, 1976, 325 p. (in Russ.)

Romodanovskaya E. K. Rimskie Deyaniya na Rusi: Voprosy tekstologii i rusifikatsii [Roman Acts in Russia: Questions of textology and Russification]. Moscow, Indrik Publ., 2009, 966 p. (in Russ.)

Serbskie narodnye pesni i skazki iz sbornika Vuka Stefanovicha Karadzhicha [Serbian folk songs and tales from the collection of Vuk Stefanović Karadžić]. Moscow, 1987. (in Russ.)

Slovar’ knizhnikov i knizhnosti Drevney Rusi [Dictionary of scribes and booklore of Ancient Russia]. Leningrad, 1989, iss. 2, pt. 2; 1998, no. 3, pt. 3. (in Russ.)

Soloviev S. Istoriko-literaturnye etyudy: k legendam ob Iude-predatele [Historical and literary studies: to the legends of the traitor Judas]. Kharkov, 1895, iss. 1. (in Russ.)

Sparnaay H. Zum Gregorius. Neophilologus, 1955, no. 39, S. 16–23.

Thompson S. The types of the folktale. A classification and bibliography. Antti Aarne’s “Verzeichnis der Märchentypen” (FFC № 3) translated and enlarged. Helsinki, 1964.

Velikovsky I. Edip i Ekhnaton [Oedipus and Akhenaten]. Rostov on Don, 1996, 606 p. (in Russ.)

Yarkho V. N. “Edipov kompleks” i “Tsar’ Edip” Sofokla (O nekotorykh psikhoanaliticheskikh interpretatsiyakh drevnegrecheskoy tragedii) [“Oedipus complex” and “King Oedipus” by Sophocles (On some psychoanalytic interpretations of ancient Greek tragedy)]. Voprosy literatury, 1976, no. 10, pp. 189–213. (in Russ.)

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology