![]() |
|
||||||||||||
|
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences |
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737 Roskomnadzor certificate number Эл № ФС 77-84784 | |
| Kritika i Semiotika (Critique and Semiotics) | |
|
Article
Authors: Marina A. Lappo Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Abstract: The military stories “Non-Memoirs” are Yu. M. Lotman’s only actual memoir text. This article studies the influence of the author’s professional consciousness on the concept of the “Non-Memoirs.” It has been established that Lotman’s primary identity as a philologist and a scholar takes precedence over the main narrative of his war-time experiences: the author views everything he describes, including war, university, school and his Jewish descent, through the lens of his profession. This is evident in the text’s essential structural elements, such as its composition, cohesion and the stylistic distribution of recurring elements. It was found that, firstly, when describing military situations, the author uses various methods of comparison and analogy, such as subordinate comparative, participial phrase, grammatical predicate with comparison and independent clause with semantics of assimilation. When describing peaceful life, i.e. study and work, however, only a few metaphors are used. Secondly, it was found that various techniques are only used to mask obscene language when describing war, as well as a natural transition to colloquial and vernacular vocabulary. Thirdly, various markers of positive focus and speech elements of emotional significance are only used in the text when describing his professional interests, namely linguistic means of describing positive emotions and evaluations and lexemes with semantics of intensity or exclusivity. The main features of Yu. M. Lotman’s linguistic identity are analyzed, including stylistic flexibility, courteous speech behavior, focus on the addressee and the educational nature of the narrative (e.g. clarity, accessibility, completeness, and logical presentation), as well as emotionality and sincerity. Keywords: linguistic identity, full-functional speech type, courtly linguistic identity, memoir text, focal attention, discursive markers, stylistic distribution, semantic dominant of the text, Yu. M. Lotman Bibliography: Galperin I. R. Tekst kak ob’ekt lingvisticheskogo issledovaniya [Text as an object of linguistic research]. Izd. 5, stereotip. Moscow, KomKniga, 1981. 144 p. (in Russ.) Kibrik A. A. Analiz diskursa v kognitivnoj perspektive [Discourse analysis from a cognitive perspective]: dis. … d-ra filol. nauk / Institut yazykoznaniya RAN [Dr. of Sci. (Philol.) diss. / Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences]. Мoscow, 2003. 90 p. (in Russ.) Lappo M. A. Kogo mozhno nazvat’ nositelem ehlitarnoj rechevoj kul’tury? [Who can be called a bearer of elite speech culture?]. Russkaya rech’ [Russian Speech], 2014, no. 4, pp. 67‒72. (in Russ.) Lotman Yu. M. Tekst i struktura auditorii [Text and audience structure]. Trudy po znakovym sistemam IX / Uchen. zap. Tartuskogo un-ta [Works on sign systems IX / Scientific Notes of Tartu University], 1977, no. 422, pp. 55–61. (in Russ.) Mishankina N. A. Pragmatika nauchnogo diskursa [Pragmatics of scientific discourse]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin], 2015, no. 2 (24), pp. 126–132. (in Russ.) Parsamova V. Ya. Yazykovaya lichnost’ uchenogo v ehpistolyarnykh tekstakh: na materiale pisem Yu. M. Lotmana [The linguistic personality of a scholar in epistolary texts: Based on the letters of Yu. M. Lotman]: avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk [The abstract of Cand. of Sci. (Philol.) diss.]. Saratov, 2004. 19 p. (in Russ.) Perfileva N. P. Metatekst v aspekte tekstovykh kategorij [Metatext in the aspect of text categories]. Novosibirsk, Izd-vo NSPU, 2006. 285 p. (in Russ.) Salimova L. M. Otrazhenie lingvokul’turnoj situacii v diskurse Yu. M. Lotmana kak akademicheskoj yazykovoj lichnosti [Reflection of the linguo-culturological situation in the discourse of Yu. M. Lotman as an academic language personality]. In: Perevod. Yazyk. Kul’tura [Translation. Language. Cul-ture]: Mat-ly XI mezhd. nauch.-praktich. konf. St. Petersburg, Izd-vo LGU im. A. S. Pushkina, 2020. Pp. 236–241. (in Russ.) Salimova L. M. Perspektivy izucheniya Yu. M. Lotmana kak ehlitarnoj yazykovoj lichnosti: lingvokul’turologicheskij podkhod [Prospects of studying Yu. M. Lotman as an elitist linguistic identity: A linguistic and cultural approach]. Vestnik Cherepoveckogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Cherepovets State University Bulletin], 2014, no. 8 (61), pp. 98–101. (in Russ.) Sedov K. F. Tipy yazykovykh lichnostej i strategii rechevogo povedeniya (o ritorike bytovogo konflikta) [Types of linguistic personalities and strategies of speech behavior (on the rhetoric of everyday conflict)]. Voprosy stilistiki. Vyp. 26. Yazyk i chelovek [Questions of stylistics. Issue 26. Language and man]. Saratov, Kolledzh, 1996, pp. 8‒14. (in Russ.) Silantev I. V., Shatin Yu. V. Diskurs i stereotip [Discourse and stereotype]. Kritika i semiotika [Critique and Semiotics], 2014, no. 1, pp. 10‒17. (in Russ.) Tripolskaya T. A. Yazykovaya lichnost’ v svete ehmocional’no-ocenochnoj deyatel’nosti: chuzhaya ocenka v dnevnikovom diskurse K. I. Chukovskogo [Lingual identity in aspect of emotional-evaluating activity: another’s evaluation in K. I. Chukovskiy’s diary discourse]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudar-stvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya, filologiya [Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. Series: History, Philology], 2013, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 70–77. (in Russ.) Vinokur T. G. Govoryashchij i slushayushchij. Varianty rechevogo povedeniya [The speaker and the listener. Variants of speech behavior]. Мoscow, Nauka, 1993. 172 p. (in Russ.) |
![]() |
Institute of Philology Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation +7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru |
© Institute of Philology |