![]() |
|
||||||||||||
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences |
|
||||||||||||
|
![]() | |
DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737 Roskomnadzor certificate number Эл № ФС 77-84784 | |
Kritika i Semiotika (Critique and Semiotics) | |
![]() |
|
Article
Authors: Maria I. Kiose, Evdokia D. Chulkova Moscow State Linguistic University, Moscow, Russian Federation; Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation; Diplomatic Academy of Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Moscow, Russian Federation
Abstract: The study identifies the pragmatic characteristics of time and space which appear in fiction historical discourse. High interdiscourse and intradiscourse pragmaticity of time is found in foregrounding unbounded time duration, its beginning and end, relative character of actions, temporal representation of event participants. As opposed to time, pragmaticity of space is significantly lower appearing in directed participants’ actions, which is due to higher dynamicity of fiction discourse. Keywords: time, space, historical event, discourse pragmatics, fiction discourse Bibliography: Boldyrev N. N. Kognitivnye skhemy yazykovoi interpretatsii [Cognitive schemas of language interpretation]. Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, 2016, vol. 4, pp. 10–20. (in Russ.) Casasanto D., Jasmin K. The Hands of Time: Temporal gestures in English speakers. Cognitive linguistics, 2012, no. 23 (4), pp. 643–674. Evans V. The Structure of Time: Language, Meaning and Temporal Cognition. Amsterdam, John Benjamins, 2004, 286 p. Fauconnier G., Turner M. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and The Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York, Basic Books, 2003, 464 p. Feshchenko V. V. Experimental deixis in the space of poetic text. Slovo.ru: Baltic accent, 2023, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 49–66. (in Russ.) Fuhrman O., Boroditsky L. Cross-cultural differences in mental representations of time: Evidence from an Implicit Nonlinguistic Task. Cognitive Science, 2010, no. 34 (8), pp. 1430–1451. Galperin I. P. Tekst kak ob”ekt lingvisticheskogo issledovaniya [Text as an object of linguistic research]. 4th ed. Moscow, KoMKniga, 2006, 144 p. (in Russ.) Kiose M. I. Lingvokreativnost’ v diskurse detskoi literatury [Linguistic creativity in the discourse of children’s literature]. In: Zykova I. V. (ed.). Lingvokreativnost’ v diskursakh raznykh tipov: predely i vozmozhnosti [Linguistic creativity in different types of discourses: Its Limits and Possibilities]. Moscow, Valent, 2021, pp. 363–451. (in Russ.) Kubryakova E. S. Yazyk i znanie: Na puti polucheniya znanii o yazyke: Chasti rechi s kognitivnoi tochki zreniya. Rol' yazyka v poznanii mira [Language and knowledge. On the way to knowledge of language: Parts of speech from a cognitive point of view. The role of language in understanding the world]. Russian Academy of Science, Institute of Linguistics. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoi kul’tury, 2004, 560 p. (in Russ.) Langacker R. W. Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin, New York, Mouton de Gruyter, 2000, XIII, 427 p. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk B. Introducing conceptualizations of time. In: Conceptualizations of Time. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA, John Benjamins, 2016, pp. 6–19. Lotman Yu. M. Ob iskusstve [About art]. St. Petersburg, Iskusstvo-SPb, 1998, 702 p. (in Russ.) Lyashevskaya O. N. Korpusnye instrumenty v grammaticheskikh issledovaniyakh russkogo yazyka [Corpus instruments for Russian grammar studies]. Moscow, YaSK Publ., Rukopisnye pamyatnik Drevnei Rusi, 2016, 520 p (in Russ.) Lyashevskaya O. N., Kashkin E. V. Tipy informatsii o leksicheskikh konstruktsiyakh v sisteme FreiMBank [Types of information about lexical contructions in the FrameBank system]. Proceedings of the V. V. Vinogradov Russian Language Institute, 2015, vol. 6, pp. 464–555. (in Russ.) Minyar-Belorucheva A. P. Tipologiya istoricheskogo diskursa [Tipology of historical discourse]. Language and Text, 2015, vol. 2, pp. 8–16. (in Russ.) Nikulicheva D. B. Pertseptsiya vremeni i ee korrelyatsiya s temporal’nymi kategoriyami yazyka [Perception of time and its correlation with temporal categories of language]. In: Man: Image and Essence. Humanitarian aspects. Sensing person: Perception in modern humanitarian knowledge. Moscow, INION RAN, 2015, pp. 39–50. (in Russ.) Stepanov Yu. S. Yazyk i Metod. K sovremennoi filosofii yazyka [Language and Method. Towards modern philosophy of language]. Moscow, Yazyki russkoi kul’tury, 1998, 784 p. (in Russ.) Talmy L. Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MIT Press, 2000, vol. 1: Concept Structuring Systems. viii + 495 p. Zolyan S. T. Yurii Lotman: O smysle, tekste, istorii. Temy i variatsii [Yuri Lotman: About meaning, text, history]. 2nd ed. Moscow, YaSK Publ., 2020, 320 p. (in Russ.) Zykova I. V., Kiose M. I. Parametrizatsiya lingvisticheskoi kreativnosti v mezhdiskursivnom aspekte: kinodiskurs vs. diskurs detskoi literatury [Linguistic creativity parametrization in contrasting discourse types: Cinematic discourse vs discourse of children’s literature]. Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, 2020, vol. 2, pp. 26–40. (in Russ.) |
![]() |
Institute of Philology Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation +7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru |
© Institute of Philology |