Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737
Roskomnadzor certificate number Эл № ФС 77-84784 
Critique and Semiotics
По-русски
Archive
Submission requirements
Process for Submission and Publication
Editor′s office
Editorial Board and Editorial Council
Our ethical principles
Search:


Email: silantev@post.nsu.ru

Article

Name: “I Do not Believe in Anarchy.” To the Question of the Ideological Foundations of Egor Letov’s Works

Authors: M. Yu. Martynov

Chuvash State Art Museum (Cheboksary, Russian Federation); Universität Trier (Trier, Germany)

Issue 2, 2020Pages 388-400
UDK: 82 + 329.285DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737-2020-2-388-400

Abstract: The name of Egor Letov (1964–2008), one of the most famous Russian punks today, has a stable association with anarchism in the mass consciousness, with a protest against any form of power. Some of Letov’s texts and phrases (for example, “Kill the state in yourself!”) have acquired the character of precedent – they are identified and function as anarchist texts without necessarily referring to the original source. At the same time, there are elements in Letov’s works that are difficult to reconcile with an anarchist worldview, and in general, Letov’s anarchism is not obvious. For example, the theme of death, which is one of the key themes in Letov’s works, is hardly associated with anarchism, which takes the side of life. The main purpose of the article is to clarify Letov’s attitude to anarchism, to show the role and place of the anarchist worldview in his works. The author concludes that Letov’s works is either not anarchist enough (a turn towards nationalist views) or, on the contrary, too anarchist (a form of total protest). This situation is conditioned by structural peculiarities of anarchist theory. Classical anarchism has a Manichaean structure (S. Newman), as subject and power in it are clearly separated. Letov’s creativity is not anarchist in this Manichaean sense, which requires unambiguity and clarity of its elements. Despite the evasion of Manichaean binaryism, Letov’s texts are able to keep the link with anarchism. Letov’s anarchism has broader grounds and expresses a total protest against reality, which condenses freedom into a conventional communication framework, makes it predictable, and protects it from waste.

Keywords: anarchism, power, Egor Letov, death / life, punk, totality

Bibliography:

Avrich P. The Russian Anarchists. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1967, 289 p.

Borovoy A. A. Obshchestvennye idealy sovremennogo chelovechestva. Liberalizm. Sotsializm. Anarkhizm [The social ideals of modern humanity. Liberalism. Socialism. Anarchism]. Moscow, 1906. (in Russ.)

Devis L. Individual and Community. In: Levy C., Adams M. S. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Cham, Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, p. 47–69.

Gololobov I., Steynkholt I., Pilkington Kh. Pank v Rossii: kratkaya istoriya evolyutsii [Punk in Russia: A Brief History of Evolution]. Logos. 2016, no. 4, p. 27–61. (in Russ.)

Khakim Bey. Khaos i anarkhiya. Revolyutsionnaya soteriologiya [Chaos and anarchy]. Moscow, Gileya, 2002, 274 p. (in Russ.)

Karaulov Yu. N. Russkiy yazyk i yazykovaya lichnost’ [Russian language and language personality]. Moscow, LKI Publ., 2010. (in Russ.)

Kojève А. La notion d’authorité. Paris, 2004. (Russ. ed.: Kozhev A. Ponyatie vlasti. Moscow, Prakisis, 2006, 192 p.)

Korchagin K. Smert’ mertsayushchego sub’ekta: Egor Letov, Viktor Ivaniv, total’nost’ i kontseptual’noe iskusstvo [Death of the shimmering subject: Egor Letov, Viktor Ivaniv, totality and conceptual art]. In: Domanskiy Yu., Korchinskiy A. (eds.). Letovskiy seminar. Fenomen Egora Letova v nauchnom osveshchenii [Letovskiy seminar. Phenomenon of Egor Letov in scientific coverage]. Moscow, Bull Terrier Records, 2018, p. 197–209. (in Russ.)

Korchinskiy A. Pesni Egora Letova: tekst i performans [The Egor Letov’s songs: text and performance]. Russian rock poetry: text and context, 2016, no. 16, p. 177–186. (in Russ.)

Letov E. Ya ne veryu v anarkhiyu [I do not believe in anarchy]. Moscow, 1997. (in Russ.)

Letov E. Stikhi [Poetry]. Moscow, Khor Publ., Nota-R Publ., 2003. 512 p. (in Russ.)

Limanov K. Anarkhistskaya simvolika [Anarchist symbols]. Naperekor, 1998, no. 7, p. 55–59. (in Russ.)

NAZI PUNKS FUCK OFF! Volya. International anarchist newspaper. 2000, no. 12. (in Russ.) URL: https://piter.anarhist.org/volja12-10.htm (accessed 19.07.2019).

Newman S. From Bakunin to Lakan: Anti-authoritarianism and the Disloca- tion of Power. Lanham, Lexington Books, 2001, 197 p.

Newman S. Anarchism and the Politics of Ressentiment. In: Moore J. (ed.) I am not a Man, I am Dynamite: Friedrich Nietzsche and the Anarchist Tradition. New York, Autonomedia, 2004.

Noks M. M. I love you, I want you, I need you... Oskolki, 1998, no. 9. URL: http://yanka.lenin.ru/stat/love_you.htm (accessed 19.07.2019).

O’Hara C. The Philosophy of Punk: More Than Noise! Edinburgh, AK Press, 1995. (Russ. ed.: O’Khara K. Filosofiya panka: bol’she, chem shum! Moscow, NOTA-R, 2003.)

Plato. Phaedo (Russ. ed.: Platon. Sochineniya. In 4 vols. Eds. A. F. Losev, V. F. Asmus. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg Uni. Press, Oleg Abyshko Publ., 2007, vol. 2, p. 11–96.)

Polyakov D. B. Postanarkhizm. Sol Niyumen i teoriya novoy radikal’noy politiki [Postanarchism. Saul Newman and a Theory of New Radical Politics]. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences, 2015, no. 6, p. 50–56. (in Russ.)

Ryabov P. V. Anarkhizm: segodnya, zdes’, seychas [Anarchism: today, here, now]. In: Pryamukhinskie chteniya 2009 goda. Moscow, Futuris, 2011, p. 89– 103. (in Russ.)

Semelyak M. Zhizn’ kak chudo. Interv’yu s Egorom Letovym [Life is like a miracle. Interview with Egor Letov]. Afisha, 2004, September 13–26, p. 35– 40. (in Russ.)

Shapir M. I. Esteticheskiy opyt XX veka: avangard i postmodernism [The aesthetic experience of the 20 th century: the avant-garde and postmodernism]. Philologica, 1995, no. 3/4, p. 135–143. (in Russ.)

Shostak G. Egor Letov i Misha Pank: preemstvennost’ traditsiy [Egor Letov and Misha Punk: the continuity of tradition]. In: Domanskiy Yu., Korchinskiy A. (eds.). Letovskiy seminar. Fenomen Egora Letova v nauchnom osveshchenii [Letovskiy seminar. Phenomenon of Egor Letov in scientific coverage]. Moscow, Bull Terrier Records, 2018, p. 184–196. (in Russ.)

Tov. Led Pod Nogami Mayora. Ukral? Vypil?.. V tyur’mu!!! [Stole it? Drunk? To prison!]. Situatsiya, 2003, no. 1, p. 2.

Zdanevich I., Larionov M. Pochemu my raskrashivaemsya. Manifest futuristov [Why are we dyeing ourselves. Manifesto of futurists]. In: V. N. Terekhina, A. P. Zimenkov (eds.). Russkiy futurizm: Stikhi. Stat’i. Vospominaniya [Russian futurism: Poetry. Articles. Memories]. St. Petersburg, Poligraf Publ., 2009, p. 368–370. (in Russ.)

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology