Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737
Roskomnadzor certificate number Эл № ФС 77-84784 
Critique and Semiotics
По-русски
Archive
Submission requirements
Process for Submission and Publication
Editor′s office
Editorial Board and Editorial Council
Our ethical principles
Search:


Email: silantev@post.nsu.ru

Article

Name: New European Moral Genealogy of Macintyre’s Conception

Authors: Yu. A. Asoyan

Russian State Humanity University

Issue 2, 2018Pages 209-225
UDK: 17.035.2DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737-2018-2-209-225

Abstract: The conception of Alasdair Macintyre, an Anglo-American philosopher, historian, theorist of ethics and morality, is discussed in this article. Author observed only one of the mains of Macintyres works: «After virtue. A study of Moral Theory» (Indiana: Notre Dame University Press, 1981, which was translated and publisched in Russian in 2000). The Macintyres conception is interpreted within the framework of modern European moral theory genealogy. The first subject of the discussion is the origin of moral universality as a principle of moral theory and its implications. With regard to the Macintyre's views the genealogy problematisation of his conception contains certain difficulty. It consists in the fact that Macintyre does not define his project as «genealogy». Nevertheless, the author shows that the consideration of new European family of moral theories, categories and concepts of ethics (in the situation of their occurrence) – is an important perspective of Macintyre’s research. Its main problems are associated with the discussion of the controversial values of the universalist «rational justification of morality» in 17th – 18th centuries, the formation of «the individual» structure and how it has affected on the entire conceptual field of moral theory. According to Macintyre, our morality is not what it used to be. But this has to be understood not from the viewpoint of the other content within the ever same perception of what falls into the competency of moral opinions, but from the viewpoint of the cardinal change of the sphere of this competency per se. In the pre-modern society, moral was controlled by the social group rules, and had a status character. Aside from not containing the universal moral sense, the very such claim could be perceived as directed against morality. As Macintyre insists, the significance attributed to moral opinions changed dramatically in the late 18th and 19th centuries. The moral prescriptions are addressed to all members of the society and are oriented to the human in general. At the same time the moral discourse gets separated from religious and aesthetic spheres and rationalized. According to Macintyre, the competing projects of rational justification of morality addressed to the human in general cause however the destruction of clear and holistic ethic language which existed before. In conclusion the author shows, that the Macintyre’s research is not only connected with the field of moral history itself, but is also important in bigger field. The Macintyre's approach is important for understanding of logic of transformation of social concepts in the late 18th – early 19th century, of society and culture.

Keywords: morality, ethic languages, rational justification of morality, moral universality, the Enlightenment project, the concept of the individual, the history of ideas, genealogy

Bibliography:

Adorno T. Problemy filosofii morali. Moscow, Respublika, 2000. (in Russ.)

Bad'yu A. Etika. Ocherk o soznanii zla. St. Petersburg, Maschina, 2006. (in Russ.)

Donzelot J. L’Invencion du social. Essai sur le déclin des passions politiques. Paris, Seuil, 1994.

Istoriya v entsiklopedii Didro i Dalambera. Leningrad, Nauka, 1978. (in Russ.)

Kant I. Osnovanie metafiziki nravov. Kant I. Lekcii po etike. Moscow, Respublika, 2005. (in Russ.)

Khabermas Yu. Moral'noe soznanie i kommunikativnoe dejstvie. St. Petersburg, Nauka, 2006. (in Russ.)

Koen Dzh., Arato E. Grazhdanskoe obshchestvo i politicheskaya teoriya. Moscow, Ves' mir, 2003. (in Russ.)

Koselleсk R. Vergangene Zukunft. Zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten. Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, 1979.

Kozlovski P. Obshchestvo i gosudarstvo: neizbezhnyj dualizm. Moscow, Respublika, 1998. (in Russ.)

Macintyre Al. After Vittue. A Story of Moral Theory. Indiana, Notre Dame University Press, 1981.

Macintyre Al. Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquire: Encyclopaedia, Genealogy and Tradition. Indiana, Notre Dame University Press, 1990.

Macintyre Al. Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Indiana, Notre Dame University Press, 1988.

Makintajr A. Posle dobrodeteli. Issledovaniya po teorii morali. Moscow, Akademicheskij Proekt, Ekaterinburg, Delovaya kniga, 2000. (in Russ.)

Mikhajlov A. V. Iz istorii kharaktera. Chelovek i kul'tura: individual'nost' v istorii kul'tury. Moscow, Nauka, 1990, p. 43–72. (in Russ.)

Prior A. Past, present and future. Oxford, Clarendon press, 1967.

Rozanvallon P. Utopicheskij kapitalizm. Istoriya idei rynka. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2007. (in Russ.)

Sheler M. Resentiment v strukture moralej. St. Petersburg, Nauka, 1999. (in Russ.)

Slovar' osnovnykh istoricheskikh ponyatij. Izbrannye stat'i: V 2 t. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2014. (in Russ.)

Sogomonov A. Yu., Uvarov Yu. P. Paradoksy vyvikhnutogo vremeni, ili Kak vozniklo sotsial'noe. Konstruirovanie sotsial'nogo. Moscow, URSS, 2001. (in Russ.)

Sovremennaya zapadnaya filosofiya. Entsiklopedicheskij slovar'. Pod red. O. Kheffe, V. S. Malakhova, V. P. Filatova, pri uchastii T. A. Dmitrieva. Moscow, 2009. (in Russ.)

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology