Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Siberian Journal of Philology
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: Anatomical vocabulary in the Yakut oronymy

Authors: Yana V. Struchkova

Institute for Humanitarian Research and North Indigenous People Problems of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Yakutsk, Russian Federation

In the section Linguistics

Issue 1, 2024Pages 177-191
UDK: 811.512.157DOI: 10.17223/18137083/86/13

Abstract:

The article focuses on orographic appellatives and oronyms derived from anatomical terms in the Yakut language through metaphorization. Given that the Yakut oronymy is endangered due to several sociolinguistic and socio-economic reasons, collecting, systematizing, studying, and preserving this specific layer of the Yakut toponymic lexicon in linguistic databases is relevant. We have identified more than 80 anatomical terms that contributed to the Yakut oronymy development. We divided the Yakut anatomical vocabulary used as orographic appellatives into two groups: 1) lexemes denoting the external parts of human and animal bodies and 2) lexemes denoting the internal organs of humans and animals. The comparative analysis covered the following anatomical terms: atax ‘leg’, bas ‘head’, sürex ‘heart’, tumus ‘nose; beak’, kulgaax ‘ear’, töbö ‘head’, meyii ‘brain’, emiy ‘udder’. The comparison has demonstrated a substantial similarity in the anatomical vocabulary used as orographic appellatives in the Turkic languages. However, some Turkic languages feature divergence in terms of content, possibly resulting from the influence of contact languages (related and unrelated). The abundance and variety of metaphorical anatomical terms in different Turkic languages may also be due to the physical and geographical features of the terrain on which they function. Given the above, the anatomical vocabulary can be considered an additional source for understanding the formation patterns and features of the Turkic-Mongolian geographical vocabulary of Siberia.

Keywords: anatomical vocabulary, orographic terminology, orographic appellative, orographic meaning, oronyms, oronymy, somatism, Turkic languages, Yakut language

Bibliography:

Chebochakova I. M. Somatizmy kak baza dlya slovoobrazovaniya v khakasskom yazyke [Somatisms as a basis for word formation in Khakassian language]. Siberian Journal of Philology. 2017, no. 4, pp. 271–281. DOI 10.17223/18137083/61/25

Clauson G. An Etymological Dictionary of Pre-Thirteenth-Century Turkish. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1972, 989 p.

Dybo A. V. Antropomorfnaya i zoomorfnaya metafora v tyurkskikh yazykakh [Anthropomorphic and zoomorphic metaphor in Turkic languages]. In: Sravnitel’no-istoricheskaya grammatika tyurkskikh yazykov. Pratyurkskiy yazykosnova. Kartina mira pratyurkskogo etnosa po dannym yazyka [Comparative-historical grammar of Turkic languages. Praturk basic language. The worldview of the Proto-Turkic ethnos according to the language]. Moscow, Nauka, 2006, pp. 648–659.

Ivanov S. A. Leksicheskie osobennosti govorov yakutskogo yazyka [Lexical characteristics of Yakut patois]. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 2017, 392 p.

Khisamitdinova F. G., Yagafarova G. N., Muratova R. T., Valieva M. R. Mesto somatizmov v bashkirskoy toponimii [The role of somatisms in the Bashkir toponymy]. Siberian Journal of Philology. 2018, no. 4, pp. 157–168. DOI 10.17223/18137083/ 65/15

Murzaev E. M. Ocherki toponimiki [The essays on toponymy]. Moscow, Mysl’, 1974, 382 p.

Murzaev E. M. Tyurkskie geograficheskie nazvaniya [The turkic geographical names]. Moscow, 1996, 253 p.

Podol’skaya N. V. Slovar’ russkoy onomasticheskoy terminologii [The dictionary of Russian Onomastic Terminology]. Moscow, Nauka, 1978, 201 p.

Rassadin V. I. O mongol’skom vliyanii na kazakhskiy yazyk [About the Mongolian influence on the Kazakh language]. In: Narody Prikaspiyskogo regiona: Dialog kul’tur [Peoples of the Caspian region: Dialogue of cultures]. Elista, 2009, pp. 221–224.

Samtakova K. B. Toponimiya Yugo-Vostochnykh rayonov Respubliki Altay v sopostavlenii s mongol’skimi toponimami [Toponymy of South-Eastern regions of the Altai Republic in comparison with Mongolian toponyms]. Cand. philol. sci. diss. Novosibirsk, 2008, 212 p.

Shcherbak A. M. Rannie tyurksko-mongol’skie yazykovye svyazi (8–14 vv.) [Early Turkic-Mongolian linguistic relations (8–14 centuries)]. St. Petersburg, ILI RAS, 1997, 291 p.

Shirobokova N. N. Otrazhenie yazykovykh kontaktov v leksike tyurkskikh yazykov Sibiri [Representation of language contacts in vocabulary of Turkic languages in Siberia]. Language and folklore of the indigenous peoples of Siberia. Novosibirsk, 2014, iss. 14, pp. 4–21.

Sravnitel’no-istoricheskaya grammatika tyurkskikh yazykov. Leksika [Comparative-historical grammar of Turkic languages]. 2nd ed., enl. Moscow, Nauka, 2001, 822 p.

Sunchugashev R. D. Oronimiya Khakasii [The oronymy of Khakassia]. Cand. philol. sci. diss. Moscow, 1999, 180 p.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology