Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Siberian Journal of Philology
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: Genitive and ablative possessive constructs as markers of comparison in the Tuvan language

Authors: Lyudmila A. Shamina

Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

In the section Linguistics

Issue 4, 2023Pages 243-259
UDK: 811.512.156 + 81'366.55 + 81'366.54DOI: 10.17223/18137083/85/18

Abstract:

Comparative relations in the Tuvan language are expressed by non-isosemic isafetal possessive constructions, with a possessive relation encoded by a genitive group: {N=GEN N=POSS.3}, i.e., the combination of names in the genitive and possessive. Furthermore, degrees of comparison are expressed by ablative-possessive structures, formed by combinations of a substantiated adjective in the ablative with the same adjective in the nominative {ADJ=ABL ADJ}. Genitive-ablative possessive structures represent a comparative model comprising two comparators: the object (1) and the standard (2) of comparison and the comparison parameter. Comparison can also be expressed by morphosyntactic means that constitute another structural variant of the construction, with comparator 1 not marked by the genitive but by the indicator of the possessive and the second by the possessive marker =nyy / =niy. In the Tuvan language, genitive-possessive and ablative-possessive constructions express elative and superlative semantics. Superlative semantics is also expressed by two analytic constructions, including comparative particles. In religious discourse texts, the superlative is a widely used means of comparison as a model of figurative thought. The non-isosemic use of a genitive-possessive (isaphet) construction for conveying singularity and imagery is associated with the interpretation of the semantic, syntactic, and stylistic plan of the text, the peculiarities of perception, the recreation of the textual strategy or manner, and the desire to understand the culture and spirituality of the people.

Keywords:

Bibliography:

Brykina M. M. Yazykovye sposoby kodirovaniya posessivnosti (na materiale kor-

pusnogo issledovaniya russkogo yazyka) [Language ways of encoding possessivity (based on the corpus study of the Russian language)]. Abstract of Cand. philol. sci. diss. Moscow, 2009, 24 p.

Cheremisina M. I. Nekotoryye voprosy sintaksisa: sravnitel’nyye konstruktsii sovremennogo russkogo yazyka: materialy spetskursa [Some issues of syntax: comparative constructions of the modern Russian language: materials of the special course]. Novosibirsk, 1971, 181 p.

Cheremisina M. I., Shamina L. A. Vyrazheniye sravneniya v tuvinskom yazyke [Еxpression of comparison in the Tuvan language]. In: Yazyki korennykh narodov Sibiri [Languages of the indigenous peoples of Siberia]. Novosibirsk, 1996, iss. 3, pp. 65‒84.

Cheremisina M. I. Sravnitel’nyye konstruktsii russkogo yazyka [Comparative constructions of the Russian language]. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1976, 270 p.

Fedina N. N., Koshkareva N. B. Reduktsiya kak mekhanizm var’irovaniya sravnitel’nykh analitiko-sinteticheskikh polipredikativnykh konstruktsiy s poslelogom shylap//shchylap//shchynap ‘kak, kak budto’ v chalkanskom yazyke [Reduction as a mechanism of variation of comparative analytical-synthetic polypredicative constructions with the postposition shylap//schylap//schynap ‘as if’ in the Chalkan language]. Languages and Folklore of Indigenous Peoples of Siberia. 2023, no. 2 (iss. 46), pp. 53‒64. DOI 10.25205/2312-6337-2023-2-53-64

Gadzhieva N. Z. Osnovnye puti razvitiya sintaksicheskoy struktury tyurkskikh yazykov [The main ways of development of the syntactic structure of the Turkic languages]. Moscow, Nauka, 1973, 408 p. Iskhakov F. G., Pal’mbakh A. A. Grammatika tuvinskogo yazyka [Grammar of the Tuvan language]. Moscow, Vost. lit., 1961, 472 p.

Letuchiy A. B. Sravnitel’nye konstruktsii [Comparative constructions]. In: Materialy k korpusnoy grammatike russkogo yazyka. Sintaksicheskie konstruktsii i grammaticheskie kategorii [Materials for the corpus grammar of the Russian language]. St. Petersburg, Nestor-Istoriya, 2017, iss. 2, pp. 132–204.

Mizhit L. S. Perevod Biblii na tuvinskiy yazyk: obogashcheniye leksicheskogo sostava tuvinskogo literaturnogo yazyka [Translating the Bible into Tuvan: enriching the lexical composition of the Tuvan literary language]. Rodnoy Yazyk (Mother Tongue). 2016, no. 1(4), pp. 141–155.

Nevskaya I. A. Tipologicheskiye osobennosti shorskikh ekvativnykh i similyativnykh konstruktsiy [Typological features of Shor equative and similative constructions]. Siberian Journal of Philology. 2022, no. 4, pp. 286–299. DOI 10.17223/ 18137083/81/22

Orus-ool S. M. Tuvinskiye geroicheskiye skazaniya (tekstologiya, poetika, stil’) [Tuvan heroic tales (textual criticism, poetics, style).]. Moscow, Maks Press, 2001, 422 p.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology