Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Siberian Journal of Philology
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: Structure and semantics of negative biverbal constructions in the Altai language

Authors: Alena R. Tazranova

Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

In the section Linguistics

Issue 4, 2023Pages 211-228
UDK: 811.512.151’36DOI: 10.17223/18137083/85/16

Abstract:

This paper considers the morphological verbal negation in biverbal constructions. Depending on the negation affix location, two structural types of negative biverbal constructions were identified. The first involves a negative form of the autosemantic component: Tv=NEG.CV + VAUX=TEMP/MOD=PERS. The second comprises a negative form of the auxiliary component, with the autosemantic component taking one of the adverbial forms: Tv=CV + VAUX=NEG=TEMP/MOD=PERS. The position of the negative affix is not a simple structural variation: it reveals the semantic differences manifested in the set of auxiliary verbs and meanings transmitted by the construction. When the negative marker is located on the significant component, the negation does not go beyond the limits of aspectuality, indicating the incompleteness of the perfective action and denying the corresponding aspectual semantics. When the second component is negated, various modal and evidential meanings, e.g., those of impossibility, firm statement of the speaker, and others, additionally appear. The specifics of using negative analytical constructions with auxiliary verbs is that they may not always have a semantic pair in positive constructions with the same verbs. Semantically, negative constructions express not only negation or absence but also various specific shades introduced by each auxiliary verb. For example, the verb al= is used in positive constructions as an auxiliary with the meaning of “doing something in your own interests, for yourself.” In negative constructions, the verb al= expresses the impossibility of action or state, with the auxiliary verb bar= expressing the termination of action, called a negative adverbial participle.

Keywords: verbal analytical constructions, negative biverbal constructions, negation affix, modality, aspectuality, actionality, Turkic languages, Altaic language, morphology

Bibliography:

Abdullaev S. A. Variativnost’ utverzhdeniya i otritsaniya v raznosistemnykh yazykakh [Variability of affirmation and negation in multi-system languages]. Abstract of Doct. philol. sci. diss. Tbilisi, 1988, 43 p.

Dambaa O. V. Leksicheskie sredstva otritsaniya v tuvinskom yazyke v sopostavlenii s yuzhnosibirskimi tyurkskimi, mongol’skim i drevnetyurkskim yazykami [Lexical means of negation in the Tuvan language in comparison with the South Siberian Turkic, Mongolian and Ancient Turkic languages]. Abstract of Cand. philol. sci. diss. Novosibirsk, 2005, 20 p.

Dzhafarov D. A. Sposoby vyrazheniya otritsaniya v sovremennom azerbaydzhanskom literaturnom yazyke [Ways of expressing negation in the modern Azerbaijani literary language]. Abstract of Cand. philol. sci. diss. Baku, 1965, 21 p.

Cheremisina M. I. Analiticheskie sposoby vyrazheniya otsutstviya i otritsaniya v tyurkskikh yazykakh Yuzhnoy Sibiri [Analytical ways of expressing absence and negation in the Turkic languages of Southern Siberia]. In: Yazyki korennykh narodov Sibiri [Languages of the indigenous peoples of Siberia]. Novosibirsk, 1996, iss. 3, pp. 3–40.

Cheremisina M. I. Osnovnye tipy analiticheskikh konstruktsiy skazuemogo v tyurkskikh yazykakh Yuzhnoy Sibiri [The main types of analytical predicate constructions in the Turkic languages of Southern Siberia]. In: Yazyki korennykh narodov Sibiri [Languages of the indigenous peoples of Siberia]. Novosibirsk, 1995, iss. 2, pp. 3–22.

Cheremisina M. I. Teoreticheskie problemy sintaksisa i leksikologii jazykov raznyh system [Theoretical problems of syntax and lexicology of languages of different systems]. Novosibirsk, 2004, 895 p.

Grammatika altayskogo yazyka [Grammar of the Altai language]. Kazan, 1869, 296 p.

Grammatika khakasskogo yazyka [Grammar of the Khakass language]. N. A. Baskakov (Ed.). Moscow, Nauka, 1975, 219 p.

Grammatika sovremennogo altayskogo yazyka. Morfologiya [Grammar of modern Altai language. Morphology]. Gorno-Altaysk, 2017, 575 p.

Grammatika sovremennogo literaturnogo yakutskogo yazyka. Fonetika i morfologiya [Grammar of the modern literary Yakut language. Phonetics and morphology].

E. I. Korkina et al. (Eds.). Moscow, Nauka, 1982, 495 p.

Grammatika tuvinskogo yazyka [Grammar of the Tuvan language. Phonetics and morphology]. Moscow, Nauka, 1961, 472 p.

Karpov V. G. Leksicheskie sredstva vyrazheniya otritsaniya v sovremennom khakasskom yazyke [Lexical means of expressing negation in the modern Khakass language]. In: Leksikologiya i slovooborazovanie khakasskogo yazyka [Lexicology and word formation of the Khakass language]. Abakan, 1987, pp. 65–74.

Khasanova L. Z. K voprosu o kategorii otritsaniya v bashkirskom yazykoznanii [On the question of the category of negation in Bashkir linguistics]. In: Problemy izucheniya i prepodavaniya filologicheskikh nauk: Materialy Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. [Problems of studying and teaching philological sciences. Materials of the All-Russian sci. and pract. conf.]. Sterlitamak, 1999, pp. 128–130.

Melchuk I. A. Kurs obshhey morfologii [Course of General morphology]. Moscow, Vienna, 1998, vol. 2, 536 p.

Rakhimov S. O. O meste edinits kategorii otritsaniya v sisteme yazyka na materiale nekotorykh indoevropeyskikh i tyurkskikh yazykov [On the place of negation category units in the language system based on the material of some Indo-European and Turkic languages]. Abstract of Cand. philol. sci. diss. Moscow, 1973, 20 p.

Sanalova B. B. K voprosu o glagol’nom otritsanii v altayskom yazyke [On the question of verbal negation in the Altai language]. In: Altayskoe yazykoznanie: problemy i issledovaniya. Materialy Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem “Altayskoe yazykoznanie: problemy i issledovaniya,” posvyashchennoy 150-letiyu pervoy “Grammatiki altayskogo yazyka” [Altai linguistics: problems and research. Materials of the All-Russian sci. and pract. conf. with international participation “Altai linguistics: problems and research” dedicated to the 150th anniversary of the first “Grammar of the Altai language”]. Gorno-Altaysk, 2019, pp. 75–82.

Sat Sh. Ch. Tuvinskiy yazyk: (Kratkiy ocherk) [Tuvan language: (A brief essay)]. In: Tuvinsko-russkiy slovar’ [Tuvan-Russian dictionary]. Moscow, 1955, pp. 615–721.

Tazranova A. R. Osnovnye puti grammatikalizatsii analiticheskikh konstruktsiy v altayskom yazyke: s glagolami dvizheniya bar= i kel= [The main ways of grammaticalization of analytical constructions in the Altai language: with the verbs of movement bar = and kel=]. In: Yazyk i kul'tura altaytsev: sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya: Materialy Region. nauch.-prakt. konf. “Yazyk i ku’tura altaytsev: sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya” [Altaians’ language and culture: modern development trends. Materials of the regional sci. and pract. conf. “Language and culture of Altaians: modern development trends”]. Gorno-Altaysk, 2016, pp. 50–56.

Tybykova A. T. Issledovaniya po sintaksisu altayskogo yazyka [Research on the syntax of the Altai language]. Novosibirsk, NSU Press, 1991, 224 p.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology