Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Siberian Journal of Philology
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: Correlation between utopian and anti-utopian and the constitutive foundations of the genre form of a novel

Authors: Alexey A. Kazakov, Dmitry L. Bystrenkov

National Research Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russian Federation 1 Tomsk State Pedagogical University, Tomsk, Russian Federation

In the section Study of literature

Issue 4, 2023Pages 128-137
UDK: 82-313.2DOI: 10.17223/18137083/85/10

Abstract:

Anti-utopia has always been in an indissoluble correlation with utopia in the life searches of a writer, in the very material of literary works, and in receptive history. This paper combines two components of György Lukács’s theory (the step that the scholar did not take himself but that was probably assumed by default). First, the subjective insecurity of the novel world implies that it is only in a utopian vein that one can search for meaningfulness and value security. Second, the novel is based on the equilibrium of the author’s and protagonist’s opposing aspirations. Combining these two components may conceptualize the novel as the equilibrium of utopian and anti-utopian. Complementing Lukacs’s concept with Hegel’s antithesis of the heroic and prosaic model of the world allows the architectonics of the novel (and utopian as its aspect) to be determined by the very semantic structure of human existence in modern reality. In other words, we live like novel heroes in a situation of value insecurity, as cogs of a prosaic world, with our existence irrelevant to the axiological structure of the world. Lukacs demonstrated how the insecurity and projectivity of the novel person generate the dynamical “novel equilibrium” of the contexts of hero and author, pathos and irony, pride and humility, imaginary and real. To conclude, the correlation between utopian and anti-utopian can be identified as a part of the architectonic collision.

Keywords: anti-utopian novel, theory of the novel, correlation of utopian and anti-utopian, D. Lukacs, novel equilibrium

Bibliography:

Bakhtin M. M. Problemy poetiki Dostoevskogo [Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics]. In: Bakhtin M. M. Sobr. soch.: V 7 t. [Collected works: In 7 vols.]. Moscow, Russkie slovari, LRC Publishing House, 2002, vol. 6, pp. 7–300.

Bystrenkov D. L. Tipologicheskie aspekty motiva smerti v romane-antiutopii 20 veka: E. Zamyatin, O. Huxley, J. Orwell [Typological aspects of the motive of death in the dystopian novel of the 20th century: E. Zamyatin, O. Huxley, J. Orwell]. In: Aktual’nye problemy lingvistiki i literaturovedeniya: Sb. materialov 7 (21) Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. molodykh uchenykh (16–18 aprelya 2020 g.) [Actual problems of linguistics and literary criticism: collection of materials 7 (21) of the International Scientific and practical conference of young scientists (April 16–18, 2020)]. Tomsk, 2020, iss. 21, pp. 309–312.

Chernysheva T. A. Priroda fantastiki [The nature of science fiction]. Irkutsk, 1984, 336 p.

Hesse G. Igra v biser [Bead Game]. In: Gesse G. Sobr. soch.: V 8 t. [Collected works: In 8 vols.]. Moscow, Progress – Litera; Khar’kov, Folio, 1994, vol. 5, 480 p.

Kafka F. Protsess: Roman. Zamok: Roman. Novelly: Per. s nem. [Process: A novel. Castle: Roman. Novels: Transl. from German]. Moscow, Martin, 2016, 544 p.

Kazakov A. A. Prozaicheskaya model’ mira v istorii romana 19–20 vv. [The prosaic model of the world in the history of the novel of the 19th–20th centuries]. In: Problemy literaturnykh zhanrov: Materialy 10 Mezhdunar. konf. (15–17 oktyabrya 2001 g.). [Problems of literary genres: Proceedings of the 10th Intern. conf. (October 15–17, 2001)]. Tomsk, TSU, 2002, pt. 1, pp. 411–415.

Lanin B. A., Borishanskaya M. M. Russkaya antiutopiya 20 veka [Russian anti-utopia of the 20th century]. Moscow, 1994, 247 p.

Lukach G. Teoriya romana (Opyt istoriko-filosofskogo issledovaniya form bol’shoy epiki) [The Theory of the Novel (An experience of the historical and philosophical study of the forms of a great epic)]. New Literary Observer. 1994, no. 9, pp. 19–78.

Orwell J. i esse raznykh let. Roman i khudozhestvennaya publitsistika [1984 and essays from different years. Novel and art journalism]. S. Murav’ev, A. M. Zverev,

A. A. Fayngar et al. (Comps.). Moscow, Progress, 1989, 384 p.

Sabinina O. B. Zhanr antiutopii v anglijskoj i amerikanskoj literature 30 – 50-kh godov XX veka [Genre of dystopia in English and American literature of the 1930s –1950s]. Cand. philol. sci. diss. Moscow, 1989, 153 p.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology