Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Siberian Journal of Philology
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: Turgenev’s tradition in the early prose of A. P. Chekhov (a case study of the story “Late-Blooming Flowers,” 1882)

Authors: Svetlana N. Cherepanova

University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius in Trnava Trnava, Slovak Republic

In the section Study of literature

Issue 1, 2023Pages 116-128
UDK: 821.161.1DOI: 10.17223/18137083/82/8

Abstract: The paper examines how Turgenev’s tradition is reinterpreted in the story “Late-Blooming Flowers,” belonging to the early period of Chekhov’s creative work. Attention is paid to the system of images and techniques of their depiction, the manor world, and reverence for the word. The analysis of Chekhov’s and Turgenev’s landscapes revealed that the ways of depict- ing familiar images were transformed into clichés. Psychological parallelism in Turgenev’s work contributes to the understanding of the characters’ inner states. Chekhov describes na- ture in cursory strokes by combining heterogeneous concepts in one row, leading to a comic effect. He ironically refers to the technique of creating the main characters with external facial features not indicative of the hero’s inner state. The change of literary eras also affects the type of hero, demanding a different artistic challenge. The change of values allows Chekhov to express his attitude to the modern era: the moral values of the past are consigned to oblivi- on. In Chekhov’s story, the manor world is destroyed, with the honor and dignity of the noble word replaced by drunkenness and riotous life. To summarize, Chekhov reinterpreted Turge- nev’s tradition not by criticizing the writing style but by expressing his attitude toward the writing process. For it was no longer possible to write as one did before, the literature of Che- khov’s time required new ways of imagery. It is through rethinking the Turgenev tradition that Chekhov assesses the moral foundation of the modern era, revealing the impossibility of the former way of life to exist.

Keywords: Russian literature, Chekhov, Turgenev, “Late-Blooming Flowers”, mansion, Turgenev tradi- tion

Bibliography:

Byalyy G. A. Russkiy realizm. Ot Turgeneva k Chekhovu [Russian realism. From Turgenev to Chekhov]. Leningrad, Sov. pisatel’, 1990, 660 p.

Derman A. S. O masterstve Chekhova [On the mastery of Chekhov]. Moscow, 1959, 207 p.

Dolinin A. S. Dostoevskiy i drugie: stat’i i issledovaniya o russkoy klassicheskoy lit- erature [Dostoevsky and others: articles and research on Russian classical literature]. Leningrad, Khudozh. lit., 1989, 480 p.

Ermolenko S. I. “Golovlevo – eto sama smert’” (obraz “dvoryanskogo gnezda” v romane M. E. Saltykova-Shchedrina “Gospoda Golovlevy”) (stat’ya vtoraya) [“Go- lovlyovo is death itself” (the image of the “noble nest” in the novel by M. E. Saltykov- Shchedrin “The Golovlyov Family”) (paper two)]. Philological Class. 2003, no. 10, pp. 67–75.

Gorlenko F. M. Ekspressivno-smyslovye svyazi slov kak osnova khudozhestvennoy obraznosti v rasskaze A. P. Chekhova “Tsvety zapozdalye” [Expressive and semantic connections of words as the basis of artistic imagery in the story of A. P. Chekhov “Late-blooming Flowers”]. URL: http://apchekhov.ru/books/item/f00/s00/z0000026/ st008.shtml (accessed 29.03.2021).

Grigoryan G. A. A. P. Chekhov – chitatel’ i kritik I. S. Turgeneva [A. P. Chekhov – a reader and critic of I. S. Turgenev]. Cand. philol. sci. diss. Moscow, 2019, 207 p.

Gritskevich Yu. N. Usadebnyy tekst na zanyatiyakh po russkomu yazyku kak inostrannomu [The educational text in the classroom on Russian as a foreign language]. Bulletin of the Pskov State University. Series: Social Sciences and Humanities. 2014, no. 5, pp. 283–288.

Gromov M. P. Chekhov i ego velikie predshestvenniki [Chekhov and his great pre- decessors]. URL: http://apchekhov.ru/books/item/f00/s00/z0000009/st003.shtml (ac- cessed 18.02.2021).

Kapitanova L. A. “Oglyanut’sya i poiskat’ prezhnego”: “malyy” usadebnyy mir v romane Yu. V. Zhadovskoy “V storone ot bol’shogo sveta”. Stat’ya pervaya [“Looking back and searching for the previous”: “Small” country estate world in Y. V. Zhadov- skaya’s novel “Away from society”. Paper one]. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State Universi- ty. 2016, no. 1 (383), iss. 99, pp. 73–79.

Kubasov A. V. Proza A. P. Chekhova: iskusstvo stilizatsii [Сhekhov’s prose: the art of stylization]. Ekaterinburg, UrSPU, 1998, 399 p.

Kuzicheva A. P. Fenomen “Chekhov i Turgenev”. O “teni” Turgeneva, “turgenev- skikh notakh” i “turgenevskom poshibe”, o “turgenevskom” i “chekhovskom” [Phe- nomenon of “Chekhov and Turgenev”. About Turgenev’s “shadow”, “Turgenev’s notes” and “Turgenev’s manner”, about “Turgenev’s” and “Chekhov’s”]. In: A. P. Che- khov i I. S. Turgenev: Sb. st. po materialam Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. Shestye Skafty- movskie chteniya [A. P. Chekhov and I. S. Turgenev: Collection of articles based on the materials of Inter. sci. conf. The 6th Skaftymov Readings]. Moscow, A. A. Bakhrushin State Central Theatre Museum, 2020, pp. 66–93.

Literaturnyy byt i tvorchestvo russkikh pisateley: po vospominaniyam, dnevnikam i pis’mam. A. P. Chekhov [Literary life and creativity of Russian writers: according to memoirs, diaries and letters. A. P. Chekhov]. Leningrad, ACADEMIA, 1928, 378 p.

Merezhkovskiy D. S. Staryy vopros po povodu novogo talanta [An old question about a new talent]. In: Chekhov A. P. V sumerkakh: Ocherki i rasskazy [Chekhov A. P. In the Twilight: Essays and stories]. Moscow, Nauka, 1986, pp. 330–372.

Nikonov V. A. Imya i obshchestvo [Name and society]. Moscow, Nauka, 1974, 278 p.

Rebel’ G. M. “Chekhovskie variatsii na temu ‘turgenevskoy devushki’” [Chekhov’s variations on the theme of “Turgenev’s girl”]. Russkaya literatura. 2012, no. 2, pp. 144–170.

Tyukhova E. V. A. P. Chekhov i I. S. Turgenev: preemstvennye i tipologicheskie svyazi [A. P. Chekhov and I. S. Turgenev: succession and typological relations]. Spasskiy vestnik. 2005, no. 12 URL: http://www.turgenev.org.ru/e-book/vestnik-12- 2005/tuhova.htm (accessed 13.02.2021)

Voronin R. A. Vidy i funktsii peyzazhnykh opisaniy v literature [Types and func- tions of landscape descriptions in literature]. In: Filologiya i lingvistika v sovremennom mire: Materialy Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. (Moskva, iyun’ 2017 g.) [Philology and lin- guistics in the modern world: Proceedings of the International. Conf. (Moscow, June 2017)]. Moscow, “Buki-Vedi” Publ. House, 2017, pp. 1–4.

Zeynali B. A., Guli-zade R. N. Peyzazhnoe masterstvo I. S. Turgeneva [The land- scape mastery of Ivan Turgenev]. The world of science, culture and education. 2019, no. 6 (79), pp. 424–426.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology