Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Siberian Journal of Philology
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: Typological features of Shor equative and similative constructions

Authors: Irina А. Nevskaya

Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

In the section Linguistics

Issue 4, 2022Pages 286-299
UDK: 811.512.1’366DOI: 10.17223/18137083/81/22

Abstract:

Equative constructions state that the object compared and the standard of comparison possess the same quality to the same degree (She is as tall as her father). In contrast, similative ones presuppose that the action is processed in the same manner (She sings like her mother). Such comparative constructions of equality have not been studied sufficiently in the typological aspect. Research on such constructions in a language allows for delineating their universal and individual features. This paper deals with equality constructions in Shor, an indigenous Turkic language spoken in South Siberia, Russian Federation. The author describes the morphological means expressing comparative semantics of equality in Shor, the structural and semantic types of such comparative constructions, distinguishing their equative and simulative semantic and structural types, as well as quantitative and qualitative ones. Also, generalized equality constructions are considered. The descriptive framework and terminology of Martin Haspelmath and Oda Buchholz are used to describe the typological properties of Shor equality constructions.

This research has shown Shor to preserve ancient synthetic equality markers. They can be classified into quantitative and qualitative ones, although this distinction is present only in equative constructions. These markers are gradually replaced by newly coined analytical markers that are much more specialized and can be used only in equative or simulative constructions and express either qualitative or quantitative semantics. Interestingly, simulative constructions can also be of the quantitative semantic type that Martin Haspelmath and Oda Buchholz consider very uncommon.

Keywords: the Shor language, comparative constructions, equative constructions, similative constructions, typology, generalized comparative constructions

Bibliography:

Aikhenvald А., Dixon R.M.W., Onishi M. Non-canonical marking of subjects and objects. Amsterdam. Benjamins, 2001.

Akhmetzhanova F. R. Polipredikativnye konstruktsii kazakhskogo yazyka, vyrazha-

yushchie sravneniya [Polipredicative constructions of the Kazakh language expressing comparison]. In: Strukturnye i funktsional’nye tipy slozhnykh predlozheniy [Structural and functional types of complex sentences]. Novosibirsk, 1982, pp. 115–125.

Andersen Paul K. Word order typology and comparative constructions. Amsterdam, etc., Benjamin’s, 1983.

Cheremisina M. I., Gutman E. A. Nazvaniya zhivotnykh v sostave sravneniy [Names of animals in comparisons]. In: Voprosy yazyka i literatury [Problems of language and literature]. Novosibirsk, NSU, 1970b, iss. 4, pt. 1, pp. 253–266.

Cheremisina M. I. Nekotorye voprosy sintaksisa (sravnitel’nye konstruktsii russkogo yazyka) [Some problematic issues of the syntax (Russian comparative constructions)]. Novosibirsk, NSU, 1971a, 181 p.

Cheremisina M. I. O funktsiyakh mestoimeniy v pridatochnoy chasti modal'nykh sravneniy [On functions of pronouns in dependent clauses of modal comparative constructions]. In: Voprosy yazyka i literatury [Problems of language and literature]. Novosibirsk, NSU, 1970а, iss. 4, pt. 1, pp. 3–46.

Cheremisina M. I. O semanticheskikh otnosheniyakh mezhdu sravnitel’nymi soyuzami [On semantic relations between comparative conjunctions]. In: Sinonimiya v yazyke i rechi [Synonymy in language and speech]. Novosibirsk, NSU, 1970v, pp. 212–233.

Cheremisina M. I. Sravnitel’nye konstruktsii russkogo yazyka [Comparative constructions in the Russian language]. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1976, 251 p.

Dixon R. M. W. Comparative constructions in English. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia: international review of English Studies. 2005, vol. 41, pp. 6–27.

Dixon R. M. W. Comparative constructions: a cross-linguistic typology. Studies in Language. 2008, vol. 32 (4), pp. 787–817.

Dyrenkova N. P. Grammatika shorskogo yazyka [Grammar of the Shor language]. Moscow, St. Petersburg, AN SSSR, 307 p.

Haspelmath M., Buchholz O. Equative and similative constructions in the languages of Europe. In: Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe. Johan van der Auwera (Ed.). Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter. 1998, pp. 277–334.

Henkelmann P. Constructions of equative comparison. Sprachtypol. Univ. Forsch. (STUF). 2006, no. 4/59, pp. 370–398.

Konyrov T. Strukturno-semanticheskaya priroda sravneniya v kazakhskom yazyke (komparativnye konstruktsii) [Structural and semantic features of comparison in the Kazakh language]. Alma-Ata, Mektep, 1985, 215 p.

Kyrzhinakova E. V. Sposoby vyrazheniya sravneniya v khakasskom yazyke [Means of expressing comparison in the Khakas language]. Cand. philol. sci. diss. Abakan. 2010, 262 p.

Nevskaya I. A. Spornye voprosy altayskoy grammatiki: o statuse formy na -DYy v altayskom literaturnom yazyke [Problematic questions of the Altai grammar: the status of the form -Dij in the Altai literary language]. Russian Turkology. 2016, no. 1 (14), pp. 3–15.

Nevskaya I. A., Tazhibaeva S. Zh. Issledovanie sravnitel’nykh konstruktsiy v tyurkskikh yazykakh (sravnitel’no-sopostavitel’nyy aspekt) [Research on comparative constructions in Turkic languages (a comparative aspect)]. In: Predlozhenie kak edinitsa yazyka i rechi: Vseros. nauch. simpozium s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem [Sentence as a unit of language and speech: All-Russian scientific symposium with participation of foreign scholars]. Novosibirsk, Akademizdat, 2019, pp. 183–187.

Nevskaya I. & Tazhibayeva S. Superlative readings of possessive constructions in Turkic. A comparative perspective. In: Possession and Ownership in the Languages of Europe and North and Central Asia. Lars Johanson, Lidia Federica Mazzitelli, and Irina Nevskaya (Eds.). Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2019, pp. 205–238. (Studies in Languages Companion Series 206.)

Shamina L. A. Polipredikativnye sinteticheskie predlozheniya v tuvinskom yazyke [Polipredicative synthetic sentences in the Tuvan language]. Novosibirsk, 2001, 249 p.

Similative and Equative Constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective. Typological Studies in Language 117. Yvonne Treis and Martine Vanhove (Eds.). John Benjamins, 2017, 437 p.

Skazaniya shorskogo kaychi V. E. Tannagasheva [Epic stories of the Shor storyteller V. E. Tannagasheva]. E. N. Kuz’mina (Ed.), L. N. Arbachakova (Comp., prep. for printing and transl.). Novosibirsk, NSU, 2015, 318 p.

Stassen L. The Comparative Compared. Journal of Semantics. 1984, vol. 3, pp. 143–182.

Tybykova L. N. Modal’no-sravnitel’nye konstruktsii altayskogo yazyka [Modal comparative constructions in the Altai language]. In: Tyurkologiya-88 (Tezisy dokladov i soobshcheniy V Vsesoyuznoy tyurkologicheskoy konferentsii) [Türkology-88 (Theses of reports and reports of the 5th All-Union Türkological conference)]. Frunze, 1988b, p. 125.

Tybykova L. N. Sposoby vyrazheniya sravneniya v altayskom yazyke [Means of expressing comparison in the Altai language]. In: Voprosy altayskogo yazykoznaniya. [Problems of the Altai philology]. Gorno-Altaysk, 1988а, pp. 111–127.

Tybykova L. N. Sravnitel’nye konstruktsii altayskogo yazyka [Comparative constructions in the Altai language]. Abstract of Cand. philol. sci. diss. Alma-Ata, 1989а, 177 p.

Tybykova L. N. Sravnitel’nye konstruktsii s pokazatelem =cha / =che v altayskom yazyke [Comparative constructions with the marker =chа/=chе in the Altai language]. Turkological studies. Novosibirsk, 1989b.

Ultan R. Some Features of Basic Comparative Constructions. Working Papers on Language Universals (Stanford) 9. 1972, pp. 117–162.

Vasil’ev Yu. I. Sposoby vyrazheniya sravneniya v yakutskom yazyke [Means of expressing comparison in the Yakut language]. Novosibirsk, 1986, 111 p.

Yeskeldiyeva B. E. Ekvativnye i similyativnye tipy – otnosheniya ravenstva v yazykakh raznykh sistem [Equative and similative types – relations of equality in languages of different system]. Bulletin of the L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Philology Series. 2016, no. 1 (110), pp. 220–225.

Yeskeldiyeva B., Tazhibayeva S. A Comparison of equality in Kazakh and Turkic languages of Siberia. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. 2015, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 398–408.

Yeskeldiyeva B. The ways of expressing comparative relations by means of the forms N-dAyand V-GAn-dAy in Kazakh. In: Abstracts of the 17th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics. Rouen, France, 2014, p. 156.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology