Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Siberian Journal of Philology
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: Complex three-component constructions of the “adverbial participle – participle” type in the Altai language

Authors: Alena R. Tazranova

Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

In the section Linguistics

Issue 4, 2022Pages 273-285
UDK: 811.512.151’36DOI: 10.17223/18137083/81/21

Abstract: Analytical constructions are common in the Altai language. The verbal analytic constructions are very diverse, including adverbial participle, participle, and infinitive ones. This paper examines three-component “adverbial participial – participial” constructions: adverbial participle on =p; auxiliary verbs of being in the participle form on =Ar and =GAn; and auxiliary verb bol= (to be) in different grammatical forms. Four subtypes of multi-component constructions were studied. The analysis revealed the analytical construction to be the most frequent, with the first component being the free verb adverbial participle and the second component represented by the verbs of being tur= (to stand), otur= (to sit) and d’at= (to lie), d’ür= (to walk), fully grammaticalized and appearing as =GAn, and the third component, the verb bol=, used as a service predicate bolor (probably) expressing a high probability of the action. The semantics of an analytical construction proved to depend on its semantic components. Each grammatical element contributes its shade depending on: a) what verb is used as the first free component; b) what auxiliary verb is used as the second component and what is the temporal form of the verb; c) the grammatical form of the modal verb bol=. The analytical constructions studied demonstrate the following pattern: if the form with =DY of the final component bol= takes on the personal affixes, then the meaning of the action credibility in the past does not come first, the meaning of the admonitive becomes apparent, expressing a warning to the addressee about possible negative actions.

Keywords: Turkic languages, Altai language, morphology, analytical constructions, verbal analytical constructions, modality, reliability, aspectality, temporality, actionality

Bibliography:

Borgoyakova T. N. O funktsional’no-semanticheskikh osobennostyakh formanta -p odyr v khakasskom yazyke [On the functional and semantic features of the formant -p odyr in Khakassian language]. Russian Turkology. 2013, no. 2 (9), pp. 10–24.

Cheremisina M. I. Teoreticheskie problemy sintaksisa i leksikologii yazykov raznykh sistem [Theoretical problems of syntax and lexicology of languages of different systems]. Novosibirsk, 2004, 895 p.

Cheremisina M. I., Tybykova A. T. O modal’nykh formakh skazuemykh altayskogo yazyka [On modal forms of predicates of the Altai language]. In: Komponenty predlozheniya (na materiale yazykov raznykh sistem) [Sentence components. (Based on the material of languages of different systems)]. Novosibirsk, 1988, pp. 3–23.

Grammatika sovremennogo altayskogo yazyka. Morfologiya [Modern Altai Grammar. Morphology]. Gorno-Altaysk, 2017, 575 p.

Kotozhekova Z. P. Modal’noe znachenie vozmozhnosti v khakasskom yazyke [The modal meaning of the possibility in the Khakass language]. In: Yazyki korennykh narodov Sibiri [Languages of the indigenous peoples of Siberia]. Novosibirsk, 1998, iss. 4, pp. 164–80.

Kurpeshko N. N., Shirobokova N. N. Biverbal’nye konstruktsii s glagolami bytiya v shorskom yazyke [Biverbal constructions with verbs of being in the Shor language]. Kemerovo, 1991, 74 p.

Kyzlasova I. L. Kategoriya modal’nosti v khakasskom yazyke [The category of modality in the Khakass language]. Abstract of Cand. philol. sci. diss. Moscow, 2001.

Kyzlasova I. L. Kategoriya modal’nosti v khakasskom yazyke [The category of modality in the Khakass language]. Abakan, 2010, 149 p.

Lemskaya V. M. Grammatikalizatsiya poliverbal’nykh konstruktsiy v chulymsko-tyurkskikh govorakh: v sopostavitel’nom aspekte [Grammaticalization of polyverbal constructions in Chulym-Turkic dialects: in a comparative aspect]. Abstract of Cand. philol. sci. diss. Novosibirsk, 2011.

Maysak T. A. Tipologiya grammatikalizatsii konstruktsiy s glagolami dvizheniya i glagolami pozitsii [Typology of grammaticalization of constructions with movement verbs and position verbs]. Moscow, LRC Publishing House, 2005, 478 p.

Mel’chuk I. A. Kurs obshchey morfologii [Course of General morphology]. Moscow,Vienna, 1998, vol. 2.

Ozonova A. A. Modal’nye analiticheskie konstruktsii v altayskom yazyke [Modal analytical constructions in the Altai language]. Novosibirsk, 2006, 215 p.

Shamina L. A. Analiticheskie grammaticheskie formy i konstruktsii v funktsii skazuemogo v tuvinskom yazyke [Analytical grammatical forms and constructions in the predicate function in the Tuvan language]. Novosibirsk, 2010b, 239 p.

Shamina L. A. Glagol’nye analiticheskie konstruktsii finitnogo skazuemogo v tyurkskikh yazykakh Yuzhnoy Sibiri [Verbal analytical constructions of the finite predicate in the Turkic languages of Southern Siberia]. Novosibirsk, 2008, 72 p.

Shamina L. A., Ondar Ch. S. Glagol’nye analiticheskie konstruktsii s pervym prichastnym komponentom v tuvinskom yazyke [Verbal analytical constructions with the first participial component in the Tuvan language]. Novosibirsk, 2003, 238 p.

Shamina L. A. Strukturno-semanticheskie tipy analiticheskikh konstruktsiy v tuvinskom yazyke [Structural and semantic types of analytical constructions in the Tuvan language]. Novosibirsk, 2010a, 163 p.

Shentsova I. V. Aktsional’nye formy glagola v shorskom yazyke [The actional forms of the verb in the Shor language]. Kemerovo, 1997, 147 p.

Tazranova A. R. Biverbal’nye konstruktsii so vspomogatel’nymi glagolami bytiya v altayskom yazyke [Beaverbal constructions with auxiliary verbs of being in the Altai language]. Novosibirsk, 2005, 226 p.

Tokhnina E. T. Biverbal’nye konstruktsii s aspektual’noy semantikoy nedlitel’nosti v altayskom yazyke (v sopostavlenii s shorskim yazykom) [Biverbal constructions with the aspectual semantics of non-dullness in the Altai language (in comparison with the Shor language)]. Abstract of Cand. philol. sci. diss. Novosibirsk, 2006.

Tybykova A. T. Glagol’noe skazuemoe v altayskom yazyke [Verb predicate in the Altai language]. Gorno-Altaysk, 1989, 112 p.

Tybykova A. T. Slozhnye glagoly v altayskom yazyke [Compound verbs in the Altai language]. Gorno-Altaysk, 1996, 63 p.

Tybykova A. T. Slozhnye glagol’nye skazuemye so sluzhebnym komponentom bol= v altayskom yazyke [Complex verb predicates with the service component bol= in the Altai language]. In: Tyurkologiya [Turkology]. Frunze, 1988, pp. 222–224.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology