Article

Name: Johann Sebastian Bach and Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart in the works of Boris Poplavsky

Authors: Mamatov G. M.

Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

In the section Study of literature

Abstract:

The paper is devoted to studying the images of 18th-century German composers Johann Se-bastian Bach and Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart in the works of Boris Poplavsky, including diaries, articles, poems, and prose. It was found that the image of Bach was transformed, starting from the articles of the early 1930s to the final work “About substantiality of personality”. In early works, Bach is a symbol of Apollonian art, perfect and harmonious, but cold-blooded towards man. However, in the final work, the music of the German Baroque composer is a symbol of “Pan, who resurrected in Christ” and embodies harmony and integrity of the Uni-verse. The image of Mozart shows other connotations. He is a Dionysian artist, understood in terms of sensuality, “playing on the low and sweet” nature of man. This nature principle of Mozart, which Poplavsky names “sweet melodiousness”, is considered necessary for the for-mation of the creator, his initiation. This is related to Boris Poplavsky’s conception of the spirit of music, according to which an artist must die and sacrifice himself to the sacred spirit of music. For this reason, Mozart in Poplavsky’s conception of music has a mortal origin. In prose (novel “Apollon Bezobrazov”) and poems, the motive of Mozart’s “Requiem” arises, connected with apocalyptical themes and harmony of the world. This paper compares Poplavsky’s views and works with the concepts of his modernist predecessors and proves that the poet created original myths about musicians based on the traditions of modernity but acquiring uniqueness due to aesthetic principles.

Keywords: Boris Poplavsky, literature of Russian Abroad, concept of music, composer myths, W. A. Mozart, J. S. Bach

Bibliography:

Abert G. W. A. Mozart: V 4 t. [W. A. Mozart: In 4 vols]. Moscow, Muzyka, 1990, vol. 4, 560 p.

Averroes. Oproverzhenie oproverzheniya [Refutation of refutation]. St. Petersburg, Aleteyya, 1999, 688 p.

Barkovskaya N. V. “…Lyubyashchiy syn poezii russkoy” [“Loving son of the Russian land”]. Philological Class. 2003, no. 10, pp. 79–82.

Barkovskaya N. V. Stilevoy impul’s “bestaktnosti” v tvorchestve B. Poplavskogo [Stile impulse of tactlessness in B. Poplavsky’s creativity]. In: 20 vek. Literatura. Stil’: stilevye zakonomernosti russkoy literatury 20 veka (1900–1950): Sb. st. [20th century. Literature. Style: style patterns of Russian literature]. V. V. Eydinova (Ed. in Ch.). Ekaterinburg, 1998, iss. 3, pp. 104–115.

Blazhevich M. N. Chislovaya simvolika v muzyke nemeckogo Barokko: mif ili real’nost’ [Numeric symbolic in music of German baroque: myth or reality?]. Musical almanac of Tomsk State University. 2018, no. 5, pp. 65–70.

Chagin A. I. Puti i litsa. O russkoy literature 20 veka [Roads and faces. About Russian literature of XX century]. Moscow, Institute for Linguistic Studies RAS Publ., 2008, pp. 92–129.

Chicherin G. V. Motsart: Issledovatelskiy etyud [Mozart: researching etude]. Moscow, Muzyka, 1970, 317 p.

Dony A. Leibniz et J.-S. Bach: Métaphysique et pensée musicale à l’âge baroque. Liége, Presses universitaires de Liège, 2020, 144 p.

Druskin M. S. Passiony I. S. Bakha [Passions of J. S. Bach]. Moscow, Muzyka, 1972, 88 p.

Fauvel О., Flood R., Wilson R. Music and mathematics. From Pythagoras to Fractals. Oxford, Oxford Uni. Press, 2003, 189 p.

Gerver L. L. Muzyka i muzykal’naya mifologiya v tvorchestve russkih poetov (pervye desyatiletiya 20 veka) [Music and musical mythology in creativity of Russian poets (The first decades of the 20th century)]. Moscow, Indrik, 2001, 248 p.

Gerver L. L. Muzykal’naya kul’tura Khlebnikova [Musical culture of Khlebnikov]. In: Vestnik Obshchestva Velimira Hlebnikova [Bulletin of the Velimir Khlebnikov Society]. Moscow, Gileya, 1996. URL: https://ka2.ru/nauka/gerver_3.html (accessed: 21.12.2021).

Ivanov V. I. Dionis i pradionisiystvo [Dionysus and Early Dionysianism]. St. Petersburg, Aleteyya, 1994, 350 p.

Karlinsky S. Poetry abroad. In search of Poplavsky. In: Karlinsky S. Freedom from Violence and Lies: Essay on Russian Poetry and Music. Boston: Academic Studies Press, 2013, pp. 242–266.

Kochetkova O. S. Mif ob Orfee v tvorchestve Borisa Poplavskogo [Orpheus myth in creativity of Boris Poplavsky]. RUDN Journal of Studies in Literature and Journalism. 2010, no. 1, pp. 11–18.

Livanova T. N. Motsart i russkaya muzykal’naya kul’tura [Mozart and Russian musical culture]. St. Petersburg, Planeta muzyki, 2019, 116 p.

Lotman Yu. M. Iz razmyshleniy nad tvorcheskoy evolyutsiey Pushkina (1830 god) [From reflections about creativity evolution of Pushkin (1830)]. In: Lotman Yu. M. Pushkin. St. Petersburg, Iskusstvo-SPB, 1995, pp. 300–315.

Menegaldo E. Poeticheskaya vselennaya Borisa Poplavskogo [Poetical space of Boris Poplavsky]. St. Petersburg, Alteyya, 2007, 284 p.

Mil’kovich N. Poeticheskoe iskusstvo Borisa Poplavskogo [Poetical art of Boris Poplavsky]. Cand. philol. sci. diss., Belgrade, 2021, 256 p.

Mitrofanova A. A. Leybnits i Bakh: universal’nost’ myshleniya v ponimanii Absolyuta [Leibnitz and Bach: universality of thinking in understanding of Absolute]. Journal of Musical Science. 2019, no. 4, pp. 5–13.

Nazarenko I. I. “Orfey v adu”: transformatsiya mifa ob Orfee i Evridike v romane B. Poplavskogo “Domoy s nebes” [“Orpheus in hell”: transformation of myth of Orpheus and Eurydice in B. Poplavsky’s novell “Homeward from heaven”]. Imagology and Comparative Studies. 2020, no. 14, pp. 90–109.

Nitsshe F. Rozhdeniye tragedii iz dukha muzyki [The birth of tragedy from the spirit of music]. In: Nitsshe F. Soch.: V 2 t. [Works: in 2 vols]. Moscow, Mysl, 1990, vol. 1, pp. 47–158.

Norina N. V. Obrazy muzykal’nyh instrumentov v sbornike stihov B. Yu. Poplavskogo “Flagi” [Images of musical instruments in B. Yu. Poplavsky’s collection “Flags”]. In: Kul’turno-istoricheskoe nasledie kak faktor ustoychivogo razvitiya territorii: Materialy Mezhdunar. konf. [Culture and historic heritage as factor of sustainable development of the territory. Materials of intern. conf.]. Solikamsk, SSPI Publ., 2016, pp. 178–183.

Norina N. V. Speredenyuk A. E. Obraz Orfeya v lirike B. Poplavskogo [Image of Orpheus in B. Poplavsky’s lyric]. International research journal. 2012, no. 3, pp. 76–83.

Nosina V. B. Simvolika muzyki I. S. Bakha [Symbolic of music in music of J. S. Bach]. St. Petersburg, Kompozitor, 1997, 94 p.

Olcott A. Poplavsky: the heir presumptive of Montparnasse. TriQuarterly. 1973, no. 27, pp. 305–319.

Prokhorova N. I. Kontsept “zhiznetvorchestvo” v khudozhestvennoy kartine mira B. Yu. Poplavskogo [Concept “life-creation” in B. Yu. Poplavsky’s art worldviews]. Ab-stract of Cand. art sci. diss. Saransk, 2007, 18 p.

Rozenov E. K. O primenenii zakona “Zolotogo deleniya” v muzyke. Esteticheskoe issledovanie [About application of the “Golden ratio” in music. Esthetic research]. Izv. Sankt-Peterb. obshchestva muzykal’nykh Sobraniy. 1904, pp. 15–22.

Shveytser A. Iogann Sebastian Bakh [Johann Sebastian Bach]. Moscow, Muzyka, 1965, 751 p.

Tokarev D. V. “Mezhdu Indiey i Gegelem”. Tvorchestvo Borisa Poplavskogo v komparativnoy perspektive [“Between India and Hegel”. Art of Boris Poplavsky in com-parative perspective]. Moscow, NLO, 2011, 352 p.

Tatlow R. The Use and Abuse of Fibonacci Numbers and the Golden Section in Mu-sicology Today. Understanding Bach. 2006, vol. 1, pp. 69–85.