Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Siberian Journal of Philology
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: To the study of the structure of hagiographic fragments containing visions (Kiyevo-Pecherskiy Patericon and the Life of Alexander Svirsky)

Authors: Kovaleva T. I.

Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

In the section In memory of E. K. Romodanovskaya, the Corresponding Member of the RAS (on the 85th anniversary of her birth)

Issue 3, 2022Pages 18-26
UDK: 821.161DOI: 10.17223/18137083/80/2

Abstract:

Old Russian stories about visions in the context of writings have a movable structure that cannot be presented in the form of an absolutely stable scheme. However, abstracting from the content and analyzing the construction of a particular event in the narrative allows revealing a general construction scheme of the fragments “with visions”, suggesting a common structural scheme of the structure of any fragment “with visions” in Old Russian literature. To confirm this idea, the paper considers the structure of hagiographic fragments from “The Tale of Isakiy of the Caves” (Kiyevo-Pecherskiy Patericon) written in the 13th century and “The Life of Alexander Svirsky” of the 16th century including stories about the visions of monks contrasting in content. In “Patericon Tale,” the title character is faced with the demons in the guise of angels and a demon who has taken on the likeness of Christ. On the contrary, Alex-ander Svirsky is graced with a vision of angels and the Trinity. Not only are the common structural elements analyzed, but also the differing ones. It is shown that regardless of the content of the stories about visions, the fragments are constructed according to the general scheme. The elements of this scheme together are the mechanism driving the movement of events in the narrative, with vision being one of the necessary functional components. Different elements are interconnected with the behavior of the main characters of the works and their semantic organization.

Keywords: Old Russian hagiography, genre of visions, structural text analysis, Kiyevo-Pecherskiy Patericon, the Life of Aleхander Svirsky

Bibliography:

Drevnerusskiye pateriki: Kiyevo-Pecherskiy paterik. Volokolamskiy paterik. [Old Russian Patericons: Kiyevo-Pecherskiy Patericon. Volokolamskiy Patericon]. Moscow, Nauka, 1999, 496 p.

Klimova M. N. Ot protopopa Avvakuma do Fedora Abramova: Zhitiya “greshnykh svyatykh” v russkoy literature [From protopope Avvakum to Fyodor Abramov: Lives of “sinful saints” in Russian Literature]. Moscow, Indrik, 2010, 136 p.

Kovaleva T. I. Opyt tipologii videniy v drevnerusskoy agiografii 13–17 vv. [Experience in the typology of the visions in Old Russian hagiography of the 13th–17th centu-ries]. Studies in Theory of Literary Plot and Narratology. 2019, iss. 1, pp. 87–103. DOI 10.25205/ 2410-7883-2019-1-87-103

Kovaleva T. I. Videnija v agiograficheskih pamjatnikah drevnerusskoj literatury 13–17 vv.: Zhanrovaja evolutsija i sjuzhetoslozhenie [Visions in Old Russian hagiographic monuments of the 13th–17th centuries: Genre Evolution and Plot Structure]. Abstract of Cand. philol. sci. diss. Tomsk, 2017, 21 p.

Loparev Kh. M. Vizantiyskiye zhitiya svyatykh 8–9 vekov [Byzantine lives of the saints of the 8th–9th centuries]. In: Vizantiyskiy vremennik [Byzantine temporary]. St. Petersburg, 1911, vol. 17, iss. 1–4, pp. 1–224.

Ol’shevskaya L. A. “Prelest’ prostoty i vymysla…” [“The beauty of simplicity and fiction…”]. In: Drevnerusskiye pateriki: Kiyevo-Pecherskiy paterik. Volokolamskiy paterik [Old Russian Patericons: Kiyevo-Pecherskiy Patericon. Volokolamskiy Patericon]. Moscow, Nauka, 1999, pp. 233–252.

Pigin A. V. Videniya potustoronnego mira v russkoy rukopisnoy knizhnosti [The vi-sions of the otherworld in Russian manuscript booklore]. St. Petersburg, Dmitriy Bulanin, 2006, 430 p.

Prokofiev N. I. Obraz povestvovatelya v zhanre “videniy” literatury Drevney Rusi [The image of the narrator of the “visions” in Old Russian literature]. In: Uch. zap. Mosk. gos. ped. in-ta im. V. I. Lenina [Scientific notes of the Moscow State Pedagogical Institute]. Moscow, 1967, vol. 256, pt. 1, pp. 36–53.

Prokofiev N. I. Videniye kak zhanr v drevnerusskoy literature [The Vision as a Gen-re of Old Russian Literature]. In: Uch. zap. Mosk. gos. ped. in-ta im. V. I. Lenina [Sci-entific notes of the Moscow State Pedagogical Institute named after V. I. Lenin]. Mos-cow, 1964, vol. 231, pp. 35–56.

Romodanovskaya E. K. Sibir’ i literatura: 17 vek [Siberia and literature: the 17th century]. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 2002, 391 p.

Zhitie Aleksandra Svirskogo: Tekst i slovoukazatel’ [Life of Aleхander Svirsky: Teхt and word index]. St. Petersburg, 2002, 216 p.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology