Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Siberian Journal of Philology
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: Preliminary analysis of the Chuvash demononym

Authors: L. V. Borisova, G. G. Ilyina, E. V. Chueva

Chuvash State University, Cheboksary, Russian Federation

In the section Study of folklore

Issue 3, 2021Pages 38-48
UDK: 811.512.111DOI: 10.17223/18137083/76/3

Abstract: The paper analyzes the origin and cultural semantics of the Chuvash demononyms as compo- nents of the linguistic world landscape by studying lexicographic and folklore sources and archives. The research was carried out within the contemporary sphere of philology, dealing with the analysis of language and folklore as a cultural code of an ethnos. This interdisciplinary sphere prioritizes studying the linguistic world landscape as a part of the conceptual world landscape of the ethnos above other things. Therefore, it seems relevant to consider where the demononyms of the Chuvash language originate from and what their cultural se- mantics is since they represent the Pre-Christian religious consciousness of the ancient Chuvash. Chuvash language is of significant scientific interest as the only living language of the Bulgarian branch of the Turkic languages, still preserving many characteristics of the ancient Turkic language. The research objects are the characters of the underworld, the exact evil spirits named with different demononyms, such as alpastа, arsuri, astaha, vereselen, wupar, wupkan, usal, hayar, chuunilli, shuyttan, esrel, yuhkha. The first comprehensive analysis of the Chuvash demononyms from the etymological, cognitive discourse, and linguistic and cultural aspects has been conducted. The contents of this research and its scientific conclusions are intended to facilitate the reconstruction of one of the significant structural and functional components of the Chuvash linguistic landscape.

Keywords: demononym, cognitive linguistics, connotation, Chuvash language

Bibliography:

Ashmarin N. I. Slovar’ chuvashskogo yazyka: V 17 t. [Dictionary of the Chuvash language: in 17 vols]. Cheboksary, Russika, 2000, vols. 15–16, 676 p.

Akhmet’yanov R. G. Sravnitel’noe issledovanie tatarskogo i chuvashskogo yazykov [Comparative study of the Tatar and Chuvash languages]. Moscow, 1978, 247 p.

Borisova L. V., Chueva E. V. Klaster “nezhivaya priroda” v yazykovoy kartine mira (russko-chuvashskie paralleli) [Cluster “inanimate nature” in the language picture of the world (Russian-Chuvash parallels)]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 9. Translation theory. 2016, no. 1, pp. 100–113.

Egorov N. I. Chuvashskaya mifologiya [Chuvash mythology]. In: Ivanov V. P., Matveev G. B., Egorov N. I. et al. Kul’tura chuvashskogo kraya [Culture of the Chuvash region]. Cheboksary, Chuvash. kn. izd, 1995, 350 p.

Egorov V. G. Etimologicheskiy slovar’chuvashskogo yazyka [Etymological dictionary of the Chuvash language]. Cheboksary, 1964.

Fedotov M. R. Chuvashsko-mariyskie yazykovye vzaimosvyazi [Chuvash-Mari language interrelations]. Saransk, 1990, 335 p.

Fedotov M. R. Etimologicheskiy slovar’ chuvashskogo yazyka: V 2 t. [Etymological dictionary of the Chuvash language: in 2 vols]. Cheboksary, ChGIGN, 1996, vol. 1, 470 p., vol. 2, 509 p.

Il’ina G. G. Personazhi lesa chuvashskogo fol'klora [The characters of the forest of Chuvash folklore]. Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice. 2018, no. 7-1 (85), pp. 37–41.

Magnitskiy V. K. Materialy k ob”yasneniyu staroy chuvashskoy very [Materials for the explanation of the old Chuvash faith]. Kazan, 1881.

Matveev G. B. Narodnaya religiya chuvashey [Folk religion chuvash]. In: Chuvashi: istoriya i kul’tura: v 2 t. [Chuvashs: history and culture: In 2 vols]. V. P. Ivanov (Ed. in Ch.). Cheboksary, Chuvash. kn. izd, 2009, vol. 2, pp. 73–92.

Mifologicheskiy slovar’ [Mythological Dictionary]. E. M. Meletinskiy (Ed. in Ch.). Moscow, Sov. entsikl., 1990, 672 p.

Mil’kovich K. S. O chuvashakh [About the Chuvashs]. Severnyy arkhiv, 1827, pt. 29, no. 9–11, pp. 21–24.

Nevskaya I. The inhabitants of the Underworld and their plants. In: Erdal M. et al. (Eds.). Botanica und Zoologica in der türkishen Welt. Festschrift für Ingeborg Hauenschild. Turcologica 90. Wiesbaden, Harrassowitz, 2012, pp. 111–117.

Nevskaya I. Ayna and Aza in South Siberian Languages. In: Role of Religion in the Turkic World. Proceeding of the 1st conference on the Role of Religion in the Turkic World held on September 9–11, 2015, Budapest. Eva Csaci, Maria Ivanics, Tsuzcanna Olach (Eds.). Budapest, Vareg Hungary Kft., 2017, pp. 211–226.

Oynotkinova N. R. Demonim “aza” v yazyke i fol’klore tyurkov Yuzhnoy Sibiri [Demonym “aza” in the language and folklore of the Türks of Southern Siberia]. Siberian Journal of Philology. 2018, no. 2, pp. 40–52.

Sagalaev A. M. Uralo-altayskaya mifologiya [Ural-Altai mythology]. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1991, 156 p.

Salmin A. K. Sistema religii chuvashey [The system of Chuvash religion]. St. Petersburg, Nauka, 2007, 652 p.

Sevortyan E. V. Etimologicheskiy slovar’ tyurkskikh yazykov (Obshchetyurkskie i mezhtyurkskie osnovy na glasnye) [Etymological dictionary of Turkic languages (common Turkic and inter-Turkic bases for vowels)]. Moscow, Nauka, 1974, 768 p.

Sboev V. A. Chuvashi v bytovom, istoricheskom i religioznom otnosheniyakh. Ikh proiskhozhdenie, yazyk, obryady, pover'ya, predaniya [Chuvash in everyday, historical and religious relations. Their origin, language, rituals, beliefs, legends]. Moscow, 1865, 191 p.

Zolotnitskiy N. I. Kornevoy chuvashsko-russkiy slovar’, sravnennyy s yazykami i narechiyami raznykh narodov tyurkskogo, finskogo i drugikh plemen [Chuvash- Russian root dictionary, compared with the languages and adverbs of different peoples of the Turkic, Finnish and other tribes]. Kazan: Typ. of the Imp. Univ., 1875, 280 p.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology