Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Siberian Journal of Philology
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: “Yakutia” by A. E. Stroganov. Artistic deconstruction of the mythological idyll

Authors: I. V. Silantev, Yu. V. Shatin

Institute of Philology SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

In the section Study of literature

Issue 2, 2021Pages 137-147
UDK: 821.161.1DOI: 10.17223/18137083/75/10

Abstract: The problem of idyllic space occupies an important place in the mythopoetics of the Siberian text and can rightfully be considered as one of the dominant mythologemes in the culture and literature of the peoples of Siberia. The implementation of this mythologeme is often the mythopoetic topos of Belovodye. Belovodye attracted the attention of writers of the past two centuries, including Siberian authors A. E. Novoselov, M. Plotnikov, and others. The change in the paradigm of realistic writing with postmodern writing, which took place at the turn of the 20th – 21st centuries, allows taking a different look at the mythological idyll to discover other ways of its artistic deconstruction. The play “Yakutia” by Altai playwright A. E. Stroganov is considered as an example of deconstruction of the idyllic myth of the postmodern era. Intended as an idyll of desolation, cold, and asceticism, finally, Yakutia miraculously turns into a country of joy, light and, warmth, i.e., it becomes the opposite of the idyll, more consistent with the traditional form of typification. In the context of postmodernism, an appeal to the idyll shows that it has the features opposite to the realistic interpretation. The idea of collective happiness is clearly replaced by the idea of individual freedom of a single person, his existence. At the same time, the main, archetypal features of the transformed world turn out to be very similar to the original prototype: the world of evil left by the heroes opens the way not for an idyll but for a new experience of comprehending the universe.

Keywords: mythopoetics, the myth of Belovodye, Siberian literature, A. E. Stroganov, the play “Yakutia”

Bibliography:

Bart R. Izbrannye raboty. Semiotika. Poetika [Selected works. Semiotics. Poetics]. Moscow, 1989.

Bakhtin M. M. Formy vremeni i khronotopa v romane [Forms of time and chronotope in the novel]. In: Bakhtin M. M. Voprosy literatury i estetiki. Issledovaniya raznykh let [Questions of literature and aesthetics. Studies of different years]. Moscow, 1975, pp. 234–407.

Bogumil T. A. Belovod’e: legenda, mif, brend [Belovodie: legend, myth, brand]. Culture and text. 2018, no. 3, pp. 89–102.

Brekht B. O teatre [About the theater]. Moscow, 1960.

Chistov K. V. Legenda o Belovod’e [Legend of Belovodiye]. Tr. Kare’skogo filiala Akademii nauk SSSR. 1962, iss. 35, pp. 116–181.

Dmitrieva E. E. Mif o Belovod’e, opon’skoe tsarstvo staroverov-begunov i zagadka vtorogo toma “Mertvykh dush” [The myth of Belovodie, the opon kingdom of the old believers-runners and the riddle of the second volume of Dead Souls]. Studia Litterarum. 2018, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 116–143.

Dutchak E. E. Iz “Vavilona” v “Belovod’e”: adaptatsionnye vozmozhnosti taezhnykh obshchin staroverov-strannikov [From “Babylon” to “Belovodye”: adaptation possibilities of taiga communities of old believers-strangers]. Tomsk, 2007.

Kovtun N. V. Ideya zemnogo raya v povesti A. E. Novoselova “Belovod’e” [The idea of the earthly paradise in the story of A. E. Novoselov “Belovodye”]. In: Sibirskiy tekst v natsional’nom syuzhetnom prostranstve [Siberian text in the national narrative space]. Krasnoyarsk, 2010, pp. 133–143.

Kuptsova O. “Drama soznaniya” Aleksandra Stroganova i Klima [“Drama of consciousness” of Alexander Stroganov and Klima]. Acta universitatis Lodziensis. Folia litteraria rossica. 2013, no. 8, pp. 151–163.

Lakan J. Funktsiya i pole rechi i yazyka v psikhoanalize [The function and field of speech and language in psychoanalysis]. Moscow, 1995.

Papkova E. A. “Belovod’e” Mikhaila Plotnikova: russkaya literatura 1-y treti 20 v. v poiskakh krest’yanskogo raya [Mikhail Plotnikov’s Belovodye: Russian literature of the 1st third of the 20th century in search of a peasant paradise]. Sibirskie ogni. 2011, no. 4, pp. 133–139.

Stroganov A. E. Pararealizm [Pararealism]. URL: http://www.stroganow.ru/pararealism/.

Tyupa V. I. Mifologema Sibiri: k voprosu o “sibirskom tekste” russkoy literatury [Mythologem of Siberia: to the question of the “Siberian text” of Russian literature]. Siberian Journal of Philology. 2002, no. 1, pp. 28–35.

Zamyatin D. Lokal’nye mify: modern i geograficheskoe voobrazhenie [Local myths: modernity and geographical imagination]. Observatory of Culture. 2009, no. 2, pp. 14– 23.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology