Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Siberian Journal of Philology
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: Conceptualization of sacrifice: discursive vectors of evaluation

Authors: V. I. Karasik, M. S. Milovanova

Pushkin State Russian Language Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation

In the section Linguistics

Issue 1, 2021Pages 321-336
UDK: 81’42DOI: 10.17223/18137083/74/24

Abstract: The paper deals with understanding a sacrifice in linguistic consciousness. The idea of sacrifice reflects the interaction between man and a higher power. The essence of this notion is the objective and ways of implementing sacrifice and the general direction of its understanding corresponds to its rationalization and, consequently, desacralization. The research material was taken from Russian and English dictionaries, National corpora of the Russian and the English languages, collections of aphorisms. The verbal explanation of the concept “sacrifice” includes five components: 1) the subject who performs a sacral act; 2) the object of sacrifice, usually a living being; 3) the objective of the action – propitiation of a supreme force or demonstration of veneration and awe; 4) the cause of action – understanding of one’s sins and the divine greatness; 5) the mode of action – giving a certain object or a living being by means of its mortification to a God. Four typical sacrifice subjects may be identified: the supreme force, which may coincide with people or ideas, the victim, the actor, and the audience. The idea of sacrifice is closely connected to the ideas of worship, trial, and heroism. Discursive vectors of conceptualization of sacrifice emphasize its sacral, or heroic, or habitual meaning. The imaginative (figurative) aspect of sacrifice shows its necessity and approval in religious discourse and its critical understanding in everyday communication. The evaluative dimension of sacrifice, as presented in aphorisms, stresses its moral importance (especially in the case of self-sacrifice) and its disputability in other circumstances.

Keywords: sacrifice, victim, concept, sacral discourse, everyday discourse

Bibliography:

Ashikhmanova N. A. Zhertvoprinoshenie kak syuzhetnyy priem [Sacrifice as a subject plot motif]. Proceedings of Southern Federal University. Philology. 2015, no. 4, pp. 58–64.

Buck C. D. A Dictionary of Selected Synonyms in the Principal Indo-European Languages. A Contribution to the History of Ideas. Chicago and London, The University of Chicago Press, 1988, 1515 p.

Chernykh P. Ya. Istoriko-etimologicheskiy slovar’ russkogo yazyka. V 2 t. 3-e izd. [Historical and etymological dictionary of the Russian language. In 2 vols. 3rd ed.]. Moscow, Rus. yaz. 1999, vol. 1, 624 p.

Gak V. G. Sud’ba i mudrost’ [Fate and wisdom]. In: Ponyatie sud’by v kontekste raznyh kul’tur [Concept of fate in the context of different cultures]. Moscow, Nauka, 1994, pp. 198–206.

Karasik V. I. Yazykovoy krug: lichnost’, kontsepty, diskurs [Linguistic circle: personality, concepts, discourse]. Moscow, Gnozis, 2004, 390 p.

Klein E. A. Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary of the English Language. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1966, 1776 p.

Kolesov V. V. Osnovy kontseptologii [Fundamentals of conceptology]. St. Petersburg, Zlatoust, 2019, 776 p.

Kononova I. V. Struktura i yazykovaya reprezentatsiya britanskoy natsional’noy moral’no-eticheskoy kontseptosfery (v sinkhronii i diakhronii) (v sinhronii i diahronii) [Structure and linguistic representation of the British national moral and ethical conceptual sphere (in synchrony and diachrony)]. Abstract of Dr. philol. sci. diss. St. Petersburg, 2010, 38 p.

Krasavskiy N. A. Emotsional’nye kontsepty v nemetskoy i russkoy lingvokul’turakh: Monografiya [Emotional concepts in German and Russian languages and cultures: Monograph]. Moscow, Gnozis, 2008, 374 p.

Pimenova M. V. Kontsept serdtse: Obraz. Ponyatie. Simvol: Monografiya [The concept “heart”: Image. Symbol: Monograph]. Kemerovo, KemSU, 2007, 500 p.

Slovar’ sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo yazyka. V 17 t. [Dictionary of modern Russian literary language. In 17 vols]. Moscow, Leningrad, AN SSSR, 1950–1965.

Slyshkin G. G. Lingvokul’turnye kontsepty i metakontsepty: Monografiya [Linguistic and cultural concepts and meta-concepts: Monograph]. Volgograd, Peremena, 2004, 340 p.

Stepanov Yu. S. Konstanty. Slovar‘ russkoy kul’tury. Opyt issledovaniya [Constants. Dictionary of Russian culture. An attempt of investigation]. Moscow, LRC Publishing House, 1997, 824 p.

Sternin I. A. Opisanie kontsepta v lingvokontseptologii [Description of a concept in conceptology]. In: Lingvokonceptologiya [Lingistic conceptology]. I. A. Sternin (Ed.). Voronezh, Istoki, 2008, iss. 1, pp. 8–20.

The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Current English. 9th ed. 1995. On CD-ROM.

Tsyganenko G. P. Etimologicheskiy slovar’ russkogo yazyka. Bolee 5000 slov. 2-e izd. [Etymological dictionary oft he Russian language. More than 5000 words. 2nd ed.]. Kiev, Rad. shk., 1989, 511 p.

Vorkachev S. G. Kakoyu meroyu merite: ideya vozdayaniya v lingvokul’ture: Monografiya [What is the measure: the idea of revenge in linguoculture: Monograph]. Krasnodar, KubSTU Publ., 2019, 372 p.

Vorkachev S. G. Voploshchenie smysla: conceptualia selecta: Monografiya [Implementation of meaning: Conceptualia selecta: Monograph]. Volgograd, Paradigma, 2014, 331 p.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology