Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Siberian Journal of Philology
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: Prototypical characterization statements and their expressive synonyms

Authors: N. B. Koshkareva, I. I. Bakaytis

Institute of Philology SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation; Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

In the section Linguistics

Issue 1, 2021Pages 293-307
UDK: 811.161.1 + 81'367.332.2 + 81'371DOI: 10.17223/18137083/74/22

Abstract: The proposition of qualitative characterization is prototypically expressed by statements like “kto / chto (est’) kakov” (somebody / something is of some kind). Expressive synonyms of such sentences are non-prototypical statements based on existential structures of the type “v kom / chem (est’) chto-to kakoe” (there is something of some kind in somebody / something). They are a means of expressing the intensity of the manifestation of the trait, persua- siveness (the author’s uncertainty that he has made an objective idea of the properties and qualities of the described object), comparison, and the actualization of the trait. The transformation method was used to clarify the differences in the semantics of prototypical and non- prototypical sentences of characterization. The impossibility of direct transformation is revealed when the predicate is expressed by an adjective, the semantics of which does not allow the combination with components denoting a weakened or, conversely, high manifestation of the trait. In the construction “v kom / chem (est’) chto-to kakoe,” any variation of the semantics of the circumstance by the category of intensity is possible. The existential structure becomes an expressive means of characterization. At the same time, the narrator is not sure about the nature and causes of the intensity of the manifestation of the trait and does not give a categorical assessment to the subject. A high degree of manifestation of the trait, represented in the statements like “kto / chto (est’) kakov,” is much more frequent. When the adjectival position is filled with a relative or possessive adjective, a non-categorical comparison is expressed.

Keywords: elementary simple sentence, typical syntactic structure, asymmetry of the syntactic sign, characterization, prototypical and non-prototypical way of expressing a proposition of characterization

Bibliography:

Arutyunova N. D., Shiryaev E. N. Russkoe predlozhenie. Bytiynyy tip: struktura i znachenie [Russian sentence. Existential type. Structure and meaning]. Moscow, 1983.

Cheremisina M. I. Paradigma elementarnogo prostogo predlozheniya kak edinitsy yazyka [Paradigm of an elementary simple sentence as a language unit]. In: Yazyki korennykh narodov Sibiri [Languages of indigenous peoples of Siberia]. Novosibirsk, 2003, iss. 11, pp. 3–29.

Kartsevskiy S. O. Ob asimmetrichnom dualizme lingvisticheskogo znaka [About asymmetrical dualism of a linguistic sign]. In: Vvedenie v yazykovedenie. Khrestomatiya [Introduction to linguistics. Сhrestomathy]. Blinov A. V., Bogatyreva I. I., Murat V. P., Rapova G. I. (Comps). Moscow, 2001, pp. 76–81.

Koshkareva N. B. O printsipakh klassifikatsii slozhnogo predlozheniya kak edinitsy yazyka i rechi [On the principles of classification of complex sentences as units of language and speech]. In: Lingvisticheskie idei V. A. Beloshapkovoy i ikh voploshchenie v sovremennoy rusistike: Kollektivnaya monografiya [Linguistic ideas of V. A. Beloshapkova and their embodiment in contemporary Russian studies: a collective monograph]. L. M. Bayduzh (Comp., ed.). Tyumen, 2010, pp. 68–95.

Koshkareva N. B. Tipovye sintaksicheskie struktury i ih semantika v ural’skih yazykah Sibiri [Typical syntactic structures and their semantics in Uralic languages of Siberia]. Abstract of Dr. philol. sci. dss. Novosibirsk, 2007.

Luk’yanova N. A. Ekspressivnaya leksika razgovornogo upotrebleniya v semanticheskom aspekte [Expressive vocabulary of colloquial usage in the semantic aspect]. Vestnik of Novosibirsk State University. Series: “History and Philology”. 2015, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 183–200.

Luk’yanova N. A. Ekspressivnaya leksika razgovornogo upotrebleniya: problemy semantiki [Expressive vocabulary of colloquial usage-problems: problems of semantics]. Novosibirsk, 1986.

Shmeleva T. V. Semanticheskiy sintaksis: Tekst lektsiy [Semantic syntax: Text of lectures]. Krasnoyarsk, 1988.

Skalichka V. Asimmetrichnyy dualizm yazykovogo znaka [Asymmetrical dualism of a linguistic sign]. In: Prazhskiy lingvisticheskiy kruzhok: Sb. st. [Prague School. Coll. of art.]. N. A. Kondrashov (Comp., ed.). Moscow, 1967, pp. 119–128.

Vsevolodova M. V. Funktsional’no-semanticheskiy sintaksis [Functional semantic syntax]. Moscow, 2000.

Zolotova G. A. Sintaksicheskiy slovar’: Repertuar edinits russkogo sintaksisa [Syntax dictionary: A list of elementary Russian syntax entities]. Moscow, 2006.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology