Article

Name: Cannibals, criminals, grotesque and mass-fiction: How the parody is made (Victor Burenin and Dmitry Minaev cases)

Authors: A. E. Kozlov

Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

In the section Study of literature

Abstract: Parodies and travesty texts of Russian journalism of the early 1870s (published in “Iskra” and “Sankt-Peterburgskie Vedomosti”) are considered in the aspect of genre functions, conventions, and elements of the “contract” between the author and the reader. The paper attempts to contextualize the parodies “Cannibals, or people of the sixties” (1871) by D. D. Minaev and “She is a criminal, or not?” (1872) by V. P. Burenin following the changing field of literature and journalism, in particular, a crisis of the polemic novel, growing popularity of action-packed fiction and mass literature, competition of “thick magazines”, weeklies, and newspapers. Special attention is paid to the editions of two parodies. Minaev’s parody “Cannibals, or people of the sixties” is an anti-nihilistic novel in the carnival space of grotesque and satire. By revealing the unsightly sides of the originals and prototypes, excessive eroticism (against V. Avenarius and V. Krestovsky) and sensational deviance (forcing one to recall A. Pisemsky, N. Leskov and F. Dostoyevsky), indicate the exhaustion of the source material. Burenin’s parody also demonstrates the exhaustion of topical themes and motives. Claiming to be a “follower” of A. Dumas-fils, E. Zola, P. A. Ponson du Terrail, Burenin skillfully parodies both a foreign crime novel (first of all, Wilkie Collins) and domestic examples of the “same” genre (Turgenev, Dostoevsky, Akhsharumov). The parodies under study combine the baroque with the postmodernist aesthetics, making these texts available for further interpretation and commentary.

Keywords: Russian literature of the 19th century, theory of parody, Burenin, Minaev, Iskra, secondary and alternativeness, carnivalization, grotesque, travesty

Bibliography:

Bakhtin M. M. Voprosy literatury i estetiki. Issledovaniya raznykh let [Literature and aesthetics. Studies of different years]. Мoscow, 1973.

Bourdieu P. Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Stanford Uni. Press, 1996, 409 p.

Chumakov Yu. N. “Evgeniy Onegin” i stikhotvornaya belletristika 1830-kh godov [“Eugene Onegin” and poetic fiction of the 1830s]. In: Chumakov Yu. N. Stikhotvornaya poetika Pushkina [Poetical poetics of Pushkin]. St. Petersburg, 1999.

Eikhenbaum B. M. O. Genri i teoriya novelly [O. Henry and the theory of the short story]. In: Eikhenbaum B. M. Literatura: Teoriya. Kritika. Polemika [Literature: Theory. Criticism. Polemics]. Leningrad, 1927.

Freydenberg O. M. Proiskhozhdenie parodii [The genesis of parody]. In: Trudy po znakovym sistemam [Works on sign systems]. Tartu, 1973, iss. 6, pp. 490–497.

Gasparov M. L. Parodiya [Parody]. In: Bol’shaya sovetskaya entsiklopediya [The Great Soviet Encyclopedia. 3rd ed]. Мoscow, 1975, vol. 19.

Gasparov M. L. “Usnulo ozero” Feta i palindromon Minaeva. Perestanovka chastey [Fet’s “Lake fell asleep” and Minaev’s palindromon. Rearrangement of parts]. In: Gasparov M. L. Izbrannye trudy [Selected works]. Moscow, 1997, vol. 2: O stikhakh [About poetry].

Grossman L. Parodiya kak zhanr literaturnoy kritiki [Parody as a genre of literary criticism]. In: Russkaya literaturnaya parodiya [Russian literary parody]. Moscow, Leningrad, 1930, pp. 390–415.

Ignatova I. B. Literaturno-kriticheskaya deyatel’nost’ V. P. Burenina: genezis, evolyutsiya, kriticheskiy metod [Literary-critical activity of V. P. Burenin: genesis, evolution, critical method]. Cand. philol. sci. diss. Moscow, 2010.

Kozlov A. E. Refleksiya epigonov v russkoy proze pervoy poloviny 19 veka [Reflexion of epigones in Russian prose of the first half of the 19th century]. Critique and semiotics. 2014, no. 1, pp. 34–55. DOI 10.22455/2500-4247-2020-5-2- 34-55

Krivonos V. Sh. Parodiya [Parody]. In: Poetika. Slovar’ aktual’nykh terminov [Poetics. Dictionary of current terms]. N. D. Tamarchenko (Ed.). Moscow, Kulagina Publ., 2008.

Krylov V. N. Obraz V. P. Burenina v parodiynoy literature nachala 20 veka [The image of V. P. Burenin in the parody literature of the early 20th century]. Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice. 2014, no. 6-2, pp. 96–98.

Lotman Yu. M. Massovaya literatura kak istoriko-kul’turnaya problema [Mass literature as a historical and cultural problem]. In: Lotman Yu. M. O russkoy literature. Stat’i i issledovaniya: istoriya russkoy prozy, teoriya literatury [On Russian literature. Articles and studies: history of Russian prose, theory of literature]. St. Petersburg, Iskusstvo, 1997.

Matveenko I. A. Tipologicheskie skhozhdeniya romanov N. D. Akhsharumova “Kontsy v vodu” i U. Kollinza “Zhenshchina v belom” [Typological convergences of N. D. Akhsharumov’s novels “Ends in water” and W. Collins’ “Woman in white”]. Siberian Journal of Philology. 2014, no. 1, pp. 80–87.

Morozov A. A. Parodiya kak literaturnyy zhanr (k teorii parodii) [Parody as literature genre (to theory of parody)]. Russkaya Literatura. 1960, no. 1, pp. 80–87.

Novikov V. I. Kniga o parodii [About parody]. Moscow, Sov. pisatel’, 1989.

Pecherskaya T. I. Raznochinskiy diskurs russkoy literatury 19 veka [Discourse of Raznochintsy of the Russian literature of the 19th century]. Novosibirsk, NSPU Publ. 2018.

Penskaya E. N., Kulikova E. Yu. Literaturnye i esteticheskie paradoksy Viktora Burenina [Literary and aesthetic paradoxes of Viktor Burenin]. Siberian Journal of Philology. 2018, no. 1, pp. 152–167. DOI 10.17223/18137083/62/11

Reytblat A. I. Burenin i Nadson: kak konstruiruetsya mif [Burenin and Nadson: how is the myth designed]. New Literary Observer. 2005, no. 75, pp. 154–167.

Rose M. A. Parody: Ancient, Modern, and Post-Modern. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1993, 316 p.

Rumyantseva V. N. Stikhotvornyy fel’eton serediny 19 veka: N. A. Nekrasov, V. S. Kurochkin, D. D. Minaev [A poetic feuilleton of the mid-19th century: N. A. Nekrasov, V. S. Kurochkin, D. D. Minaev]. Orenburg, 2007, 234 p.

Russkiy realizm 19 veka. Obshchestvo, znanie, povestvovanie [Russian realism of the 19th century. Society, knowledge, narration]. A. Vdovin, K. Ospovat, M. Vaysman (Eds). Moscow, NLO, 2020.

Shabalina N. N. Literaturnyy skandal v kritike V. P. Burenina [Literary scandal in V. P. Burenin’s criticism]. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. 2012, vol. 154, bk. 2, pp. 145–150.

Shabalina N. N. Polemika kak sredstvo propagandy literaturno-kriticheskikh vzglyadov V. P. Burenina (na materiale belletristiki 70-90-kh godov 19 veka) [Polemics as propaganda means of V. P. Burenin’s literary-critical views (by material of bélles- léttres of the 70-90s of the 19th Century)]. Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice. 2014, no. 2-2, pp. 208–212.

Shatin Yu. V. Dva lika parodii [Two faces of parody]. Critique and semiotics. 2009, no. 1, pp. 213– 220.

Shklovskiy V. B. “Tristram Shendi” Sterna i teoriya romana [Stern’s Tristram Shandy and the theory of the novel]. St. Petersburg, OPOYaZ, 1921.

Starygina N. N. Russkiy roman v situatsii filosofsko-religioznoy polemiki 1860– 1870-kh godov [Russian novel in situation of philosophical and religious polemics]. Moscow, LRC Publishing House, 2003, 352 p.

Thorstensson V. The Dialog with Nihilism in Russian Polemical Novels of the 1860s-1870s. Diss. ... Doctor of Philosophy (Slavic Languages and Literatures). Uni. of Wisconsin-Madison, 2013.

Tselikova E. V. Fenomen parodiynoy lichnosti A. A. Feta v tvorchestve poetov “Iskry” [Phenomenon of the parody personality of A. А. Fet in works of “Iskra” poets]. Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences. 2007, no. 11 (32), p. 234–237.

Tselikova E. V. Parodiynaya lichnost’ A. A. Feta v tvorchestve poetov “Iskry” [Periodical Figure of A. A. Fet the works of the poets of “Iskra”]. Cherepovets, ChSU, 2007a, 267 p.

Tynyanov Yu. N. Dostoevskiy i Gogol’ (k teorii parodii) [Dostoevsky and Gogol: to theory of parody]. In: Tynyanov Yu. N. Poetika. Istoriya literatury. Kino [Poetics. History of literature and cinema]. Moscow, 1977.

Tynyanov Yu. N. O parodii [About parody]. In: Tynyanov Yu. N. Literaturnaya evolyutsiya. Izbrannye Trudy [Literary Evolution. Selected works]. Moscow, 2002.

Vasilenko A. G. Graficheski vydelennoe slovo: evolyutsiya khudozhestvennogo priema (na materiale tvorchestva Yu. V. Trifonova) [Graphically selected word: the evolution of the artistic device (based on the works by Yu. V. Trifonov)]. Siberian Journal of Philology. 2016, no. 1, pp. 193–199. DOI 10.17223/18137083/54/23

Volodina N. V., Lavrova S. Yu. Tvorchestvo N. D. Akhsharumova: opyt monograficheskogo analiza belletristicheskikh tekstov [The creativity of N. D. Akhsharumov: the experience of monographic analysis of criticism and fiction]. Cherepovets, 2018.

Zhirkova M. A. Traditsii F. M. Dostoevskogo v romane N. D. Akhsharumova ”Kontsy v vodu” [The tradition of F. M. Dostoevsky in the N. D. Akhsharumovʼs novel “Ends in water”]. Art Logos. 2019, no. 2 (7), pp. 18–33.

Zubkov K. Yu. “Antinigilisticheskiy roman” kak polemicheskiy konstrukt radikal’noy kritiki [“Anti-nihilistic novel” as the radical criticism’s polemical construct]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 9. Philology. 2015, no. 4, pp. 122–140.