Article

Name: Specifics of the narrative about the rulers in Russian memoirs of the 20s – 70s of the 18th century

Authors: O. S. Roshchina, O. A. Farafonova

Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

In the section Study of literature

Abstract: The paper considers the ways of authors’ self-representation concerning the presentation of the figure of the ruler in Russian memoirs of the 18th century. The memoirs of the 20s – 50s tend to combine personal and impersonal narrative with the predominance of the latter. This combination makes the view of events seem objective. Memoirists do not make value judgments about rulers and describe only facts. However, even in an impersonal narrative, memoirists, being former participants or witnesses of the described events, cannot avoid making judgments about various figures of their era. In the 60s and 70s, authors mostly used personal narrative and noticed any shortcomings of the reigning characters. In some cases, memoirists justify and explain them by the harmful influence of the courtier environment or do not recognize them as particularly serious. In other cases, shortcomings in public administration or wrong actions of the monarch are seen as a direct consequence of his personality. Memoirists, whose personal formation, as a rule, was in the time of Peter the Great (Neplyuev, Shakhovskaya), think about the figure of the sovereign as of an absolute super-personal value. Obviously, this personal value came to be devalued in the minds of people of the post-Petrine era and/or those personally affected by the rule of a monarch (Dolgorukaya, Minikh). The process of memoir individualization occurs during this period simultaneously in two directions – of the subject of the utterance and the object of description.

Keywords: the 18th century, memoirs, narrative, author’s self-representation, figure of the ruler

Bibliography:

Anisimov E. Putniki, proshedshie ran’she nas [Travelers who passed before us]. In: Bezvremen’e i vremenshchiki. Vospominaniya ob “epokhe dvortsovykh perevorotov” (1720-e – 1760-e gody) [Timeless and temporary. Memories of the “era of palace coups” (1720s - 1760s)]. Leningrad, Khudozh. lit., 1991, pp. 3–24.

Dolgorukaya N. B. Svoeruchnye zapiski knyagini Natal’i Borisovny Dolgorukoy, docheri g.-fel’dmarshala grafa Borisa Petrovicha Sheremeteva [Personal notes of Princess Natalia Borisovna Dolgorukaya, daughter of General Field Marshal, Count, Boris Petrovich Sheremetev]. In: Bezremen’e i vremenshchiki. Vospominaniya ob “epokhe dvortsovykh perevorotov” (1720-e – 1760-e gody) [Timelessness and Timekeepers. Memories of the “era of palace coups” (1720s – 1760s)]. Leningrad, Khudozh. lit., 1991, pp. 256–279.

Elizavetina G. G. Stanovlenie zhanrov avtobiografii i memuarov [Establishment of genres of autobiography and memoirs]. In: Russkiy i zapadnoevropeyskiy klassitsizm. Proza [Russian and Western European classicism. Prose]. Moscow, Nauka, 1982, pp. 235–263.

Ginzburg L. Ya. O psikhologicheskoy proze [About psychological prose]. Moscow, Intrada, 1999, 416 p.

Kurakin B. I. Zhizn’ knyazya Borisa Ivanovicha Kurakina im samim opisannaya. 1676–1709 [Life of Prince Boris Ivanovich Kurakin described by himself. 1676–1709]. In: Arkhiv kn. F. A. Kurakina [Archive of Prince F. A. Kurakin.]. St. Petersburg, 1890, pp. 243–287.

Mansteyn C. H. Zapiski Manshteyna o Rossii. 1727–1744 [Manstein’s Notes on Russia]. St. Petersburg, Tip. V. S. Balasheva, 1875, 399 p.

Munnich B. C. Ocherk, dayushchiy predstavlenie ob obraze pravleniya Rossiyskoy imperii [Essay, giving an idea of the image of the Russian Empire reign]. In: Bezvremen’e i vremenshchiki. Vospominaniya ob “epokhe dvortsovykh perevorotov” (1720-e – 1760-e gody) [Timelessness and Timekeepers. Memories of the “era of palace coups” (1720s – 1760s)]. Leningrad, Khudozh. lit., 1991, pp. 26–79.

Nashchokin V. A. Zapiski [Notes]. In: Imperiya posle Petra. 1725–1765 [Empire after Peter. 1725–1765]. Moscow, Fond Sergeya Dubova, 1998, pp. 225–320.

Nikanorova E. K. Istoricheskiy anekdot v russkoy literature 18 veka: Anekdoty o Petre Velikom [Historical anecdote in Russian literature of the 18th century: Anecdotes about Peter the Great]. Novosibirsk, Sibirskiy khronograf, 2001, 466 p.

Prikazchikova E. E. Izobrazhenie monarkhov v russkoy memuarnoy literature 18 veka: v poiskakh obraza ideal’nogo pravitelya [The image of monarchs in Russian memoir literature of the 18th century: in search of the image of the ideal ruler]. Humanitarian Vector. 2019, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 119–128.

Prokopovich F. Istoriya o izbranii i vosshestvii na prestol blazhennoy i vechnodostoynoy pamyati gosudaryni imperatritsy Anny Ioannovny, samoderzhtsy vserossiyskoy [The story of the election and ascension to the throne of the blessed and everlasting memory of the sovereign Empress Anna Ioannovna, autocrats of all Russia]. In: Syn otechestva [Son of the Fatherland]. 1837, pt. 184, dt. 2, pp. 23–73.

Prokopovich F. Kratkaya povest’ o smerti Petra Velikogo, imperatora i samoderzhtsa Vserossiyskogo [A short story about the death of Peter the Great, Emperor and autocrat of all Russia]. St. Petersburg, Tip. I. Glazunova, 1831, 120 p.

Shakhovskoy Ya. P. Zapiski [Notes]. In: Imperiya posle Petra. 1725–1765 [Empire after Peter. 1725–1765]. Moscow, Fond Sergeya Dubova, 1998, pp. 9–176.

Sosnovtseva O. V. Istochniki lichnogo proiskhozhdeniya Petrovskoy epokhi [Sources of personal origin of the Peter's era]. Izvestiya of Saratov University. New Series. Series: Sociology. Politology. 2007, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 3–11.

Tartakovskiy A. G. Russkaya memuaristika 18 – pervoy poloviny 19 v.: ot rukopisi k knige [Russian memoiristics of the 18th – first half of the 19th century: from manuscript to book]. Moscow, Nauka, 1991, 288 p.