Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Siberian Journal of Philology
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: Indirect object in Manchu-Tungus languages: structural and semantic aspect (in the Orok language)

Authors: L. V. Ozolinya

Institute of Philology SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

In the section Linguistics

Issue 3, 2020Pages 243-260
UDK: 81.2.2DOI: 10.17223/18137083/72/19

Abstract: For the first time, the paper provides the analysis of the Oroc language object as a syntactic unit combining the semantic and functional aspects of transitive or non-transitive verbs. In the Manchu-Tungus languages, the object is found to be expressed in the morphological forms of the case: direct – in the accusative case and the possessive forms of the designative case, indirect – in the forms of oblique cases. Constructions with indirect objects, the positions of which are filled with case forms of nouns, designate the objects on which the action is aimed, objects from which the action is sent or evaded, objects-addresses, objects-instruments, etc. Both transitive or non-transitive verbs can take the position of the predicate. The necessary (direct object) and permissible (indirect object) composition of objects in the verb is determined by its valences: bivalent verbs open subjective (subject) and objective (direct object) valences; trivalent verbs reveal subjective, subjective-objective (part of the subject or indirect subject) and objective (indirect object) valences.

Keywords: Manchu-Tungus languages, Orok, Nanai, Even, supplement, subject, direct object, indirect object, predicate, transitional verb, non-transitional verb, object valence

Bibliography:

Avrorin V. A. Sintaksicheskie issledovaniya po nanayskomu yazyku [Syntactic research in the Nanai language]. Leningrad, Nauka, 1981, 198 p.

Avrorin V. A., Boldyrev B. V. Grammatika orochskogo yazyka [G

rammar of the Oroch language]. Novosibirsk, SB RAS, 2001, 398 p.

Mal’chukov A. L. Sintaksis prostogo predlozheniya v evenskom yazyke (strukturnye i semanticheskie aspekty) [Syntax of a simple sentence in Even language (structural and semantic aspects)]. St. Petersburg, Nauka, 1999, 257 p.

Novikova K. A. Ocherki dialektov evenskogo yazyka. Ol’skiy govor [Essays on dialects of the Even language. Olsky dialect]. Moscow, Leningrad, AN SSSR, 1960, pt. 1, 260 p.

Ozolinya L. V. Pryamoe dopolnenie v tunguso-man’chzhurskikh yazykakh: strukturno-semanticheskiy aspekt [Direct addition to the Tungus-Manchurian languages: structural-semantic aspect]. In: Materialy Vseros. nauch. simpoziuma s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem “Predlozhenie kak edinitsa yazyka i rechi», posvyashch. 95-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya M. T. Cheremisinoy [Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific Symposium with International Participation “Proposal as a unit of language and speech” dedicated to the 95th anniversary of M. T. Cheremisina]. Novosibirsk, Akademizdat, 2019, pp. 75–78.

Petrova T. I. Yazyk orokov (ul’ta) [Orok (Ulta) language]. Leningrad, Nauka, 1967, 156 p.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology