Article

Name: Axiological dominants of the diary genre (based on personal diaries)

Authors: T. G. Rabenko

Kemerovo State University, Kemerovo, Russian Federation

In the section Linguistics

Abstract: The paper studies the results of the natural written speech activity of a common language speaker from the point of philological axiology. The axiological dominants of contemporary female teenage culture are researched by the example of personal diaries, written by teenage girls of 15–17 years old. The axiological dominants actualized in the diary discourse are realized in the two components of the diary text semantic structure: 1) informative – in the form of the personally-relevant events, chosen for the diary, 2) (mostly) axiologically-reflexive, which shows the events, reflected in the consciousness of the diary author as the results of author’s interpretation. The axiological dominants of teenage girls’ diaries are influenced by different objects of author’s self-reflection, which are axiologically relevant for the author: the outer world represented by different social subjects, for example, adults, mostly parents, and teenage-mates; and the inner world in the center of which is the personality of the author of the diary. The research reveals some axiological dominants of a diary discourse subject, which are determined by gender and age identity of the diary author and her social status. They are teenager’s self-sufficiency and emotional independence from teachers and parents, personal relevance of a teenager within her age-mates, self-identity in its different aspects: ontological, moral and ethical, educational, and physical. Hence, the axiological analysis of written speech activity of a common language speaker in one of the genre representations can be estimated to be monitoring of a social, mental, and psychological state of some definite social and demographic group. It indicates the major heuristic possibilities of natural written speech studies as the studies of natural written representation of a person’s self-consciousness, given that a person is not to fulfill the self-presentation task and therefore is natural in his speech creative activity.

Keywords: natural written speech, diary, axiological analysis, value, value dominant, teen- ager

Bibliography:

Andreeva G. M. Psikhologiya sotsial’nogo poznaniya [Psychology of social cognition]. Moscow, Aspekt-Press, 2000, 288 p.

Arutyunova N. D. Yazyk i mir cheloveka [Language and the world of man]. Moscow, LRC Publishing House, 1999, 896 р.

Arkhipova N. G. Rukopisnye devich’i al’bomy: zhanrovo-tematicheskoe svoeobrazie [Handwritten girls’ albums: genre-thematic originality]. Slovo: fol’klorno-dialektologicheskiy al’manakh. 2006, iss. 4, pp. 26–32.

Baryshkov V. P. Aksiologiya lichnostnogo bytiya [Axiology of personal existence]. Moscow, Logos, 2005, 192 р.

Bol’shakov V. P. Teoriya kul’tury [Theory of culture]. St. Petersburg, Sankt-Peterburg, 2008, 164 p.

Borisov S. B. Mir russkogo devichestva 70–90 gody 20 veka [The world of Russian girlhood 70–90 years of the 20th entury]. Moscow, Ladomir, 2002, 343 p.

Churilova E. E. Osobennosti reprezentatsii samosoznaniya v lichnykh dnevnikakh sovremennykh devushek [Features of self-awareness representation in personal diaries of modern girls]. Abstract of Cand. psychol. sci. diss. Moscow, 2011.

Churilova E. E. Reprezentatsiya samosoznaniya v lichnykh dnevnikakh sovremennykh devushek [Representation of self-awareness in the personal diaries of modern girls]. Moscow, Prometey, 2016, 167 p.

Erokhina E. A., Filippova E. V. Obraz tela i otnoshenie k svoemu telu u podrostkov: semeynye i sotsiokul’turnye faktory vliyaniya (po materialam zarubezhnykh issledovaniy) [Obraz tela i otnoshenie k svoemu telu u podrostkov: semeynye i sotsiokul’turnye faktory vliyaniya (po materialam zarubezhnykh issledovaniy)]. Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology. 2019, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 57–68.

Gal’perin I. R. Tekst kak ob”ekt lingvisticheskogo issledovaniya [Text as an object of linguistic research]. Moscow, Nauka, 1981, 140 р.

Kon I. S. Psikhologiya ranney yunosti [Psychology of early youth]. Moscow, Prosveshchenie, 1989, 256 p.

Kupina N.A., Itskovich T.V. Filologicheskaya aksiologiya: itogi raboty Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii “Aksiologicheskie aspekty sovremennykh filologicheskikh issledovaniy” [Philological axiology: results of the International scientific conference “Axiological aspects of modern philological research”]. Communication Studies. 2019, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1202–1206.

Lebedeva N. B., Rabenko T. G. Zhanrovoe imya kak faktor stabilizatsii rechevogo zhanra (na materiale zhanra dnevnika) [Genre name as a factor of speech genre stabilization (based on the material of the diary genre)]. Tomsk State University Journal. 2018, no. 437, pp. 29–35.

Levin K. Teoriya polya v sotsial’nykh naukakh [Field theory in social sciences]. St. Petersburg, Sensor, 2000, 368 p.

Levkova T. V. Poisk smysla zhizni kak zadacha razvitiya sovremennogo podrostka [Search for the meaning of life as a task for the development of a modern teenager]. Modern scientific researches and innovations. 2016, no. 1. URL: http://web.snauka.ru/issues/2016/01/62286 (accessed: 07.03.2020).

Mikheev M. Yu. Dnevnik kak ego-tekst [Diary as an ego text]. Moscow, Vodoley, 2007, 264 p.

Mosienko L. V. Aksiologicheskie dominanty v khudozhestvennykh proizvedeniyakh Giyoma Myusso [Axiological dominants in the works of Guillaume Musso]. Vestnik of the Orenburg State University. 2014, no. 11 (172), рp. 47–52.

Ovsyaniko-Kulikovskiy D. N. Iz knigi “M. Yu. Lermontov” [From the book “M. Yu. Lermontov”]. In: M. Yu. Lermontov: pro et contra. V. M. Markovich, G. E. Potapova (Comps). St. Petersburg, RCHA, 2002, рp. 461–474.

Pigrov K. S. Zabota o svoey dukhovnosti, ili tekhnika skriptizatsii individual’noy zhizni [Taking care of one’s own spirituality, or the technique of scripting one’s individual life]. Vita Cogitans: Al’manakh molodykh filosofov. 2004, iss. 4, no 4, рр. 75–107.

Rabenko T. G. Zhanry estestvennoy pis’mennoy russkoy rechi v variantologicheskom aspekte [Genres of natural written Russian speech in the variantological aspect]. Dr. philol. sci. diss. Kemerovo, 2018, 356 р.

Rabenko T. G. Invariantnye i variantnye priznaki zhanrov estestvennoy pis’mennoy rechi (na materiale zhanrov “lichnyy dnevnik”, “lichnoe pis’mo”, “lichnaya zapiska”) [Invariant and variant features of natural writing genres (based on the material of the genres “personal diary”, “personal letter”, “personal note”)]. Speech Genres. 2020, no. 1 (25), рp. 6–14.

Sidorova M. Yu. Internet-lingvistika: russkiy yazyk. Mezhlichnostnoe obshchenie [Internet linguistics: Russian language. Interpersonal communication]. Moscow, 1989.ru, 2006, 193 p.

Torop P. Total’nyy perevod [Total translation]. Tartu, Nauchnyy poisk, 1995, 256 p.

Ukhtomskiy A. A. Dominanta [Dominant]. St. Petersburg, Piter, 2002, 448 p.

Voznesenskaya I. M. Dnevnik: osobennosti semanticheskoy struktury i rechevoy organizatsii [Diary: features of semantic structure and language of the organization]. The World of Russian Word. 2006, no. 3, pp. 41–48.