Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Siberian Journal of Philology
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: Functioning features of the N1Adv-o model with the predicate expressed by the evaluative adverb in colloquial speech

Authors: A. V. Degaltseva, M. A. Kormilitsyna

Saratov State University, Saratov, Russian Federation

In the section Linguistics

Issue 2, 2020Pages 239-246
UDK: 81.367.321DOI: 10.17223/18137083/71/19

Abstract: Semantic and syntactic mechanisms leading to the complication of the meaning of a simple sentence are actively studied in modern linguistics. Colloquial speech is one of the spheres of communication in which syntactic compression is widely represented. This paper analyses how the syntactic N1Adv-o model functions in colloquial speech. In this model, the subject is most often represented by specific nouns that can express a whole situation, often characterized by time parameters. These specific nouns being the subjects of the sentences is the result of one of the syntactic compression processes – nominalization. In this model, the predicate is expressed by the evaluative adverb, usually reflecting a general, mostly positive, assessment, despite the fact that negative evaluations are more widespread in colloquial speech. Other types of assessments include aesthetic, normative, gustatory, intellectual, ethical, and utilitarian ones. The objects of evaluative characterization usually turn out to be the objects of the material world, socio-cultural phenomena and facts, personal qualities. In the N1Adv-o model sentences, functioning in colloquial speech, the speaker manifests himself most often as a subject, not an object of evaluation. The total number of N1Adv-o model sentences is not great. In colloquial speech, their number is about 2.5 % of all sentences with the adverbs that are used in the function of a predicate. According to our observations, the frequency of their use is much lower in other areas of communication (less than 1 %). Thus, the sentences concerned can be considered as the significant characteristic of colloquial speech and are more productive in it. The N1Adv-o model sentences reflect the trend of analytism in the modern Russian language. They are characterized by increased implicitness and, at the same time, by their semantic capacity.

Keywords: syntax, semantic syntax, syntactic compression, nominalisation, evaluation

Bibliography:

Alisova T. B. Ocherki sintaksisa sovremennogo ital’yanskogo yazyka [Essays on the syntax of the modern Italian language]. Moscow, MSU Publ., 1971, 225 p.

Aru

tyunova N. D. Predlozhenie i ego smysl: logiko-semanticheskie problemy [The sentence and its meaning: logical and semantic problems]. Moscow, Nauka, 1976, 383 p.

Arutyunova N. D. Tipy yazykovykh znacheniy: Otsenka. Sobytie. Fakt [Types of linguistic meanings: Evaluation. Event. Fact]. Moscow, Nauka, 1988, 341 p.

Fauconnier G. Compression and Emergent Structure. Language and Linguistics. 2005, no. 64, pp. 523‒538.

Fedyaeva N. D. Semantika normy v russkom yazyke: funkcional’nyy, kategorial’nyy, lingvokul’turologicheskiy aspekty [Semantics of the norm in the Russian language: functional, categorical, linguoculturological aspects]. Abstract of Dr. philol. sci. diss. Omsk, 2010, 40 p.

Kapanadze L. A., Krasil’nikova E. V. Zhest v razgovornoy rechi [Gesture in colloquial speech]. In: Russkaya razgovornaya rech’ [Russian colloquial speech]. E. A. Zemskaya (Ed.). Moscow, Nauka, 1973, 468‒481 p.

Kibrik A. A. Modus, zhanr i drugie parametry klassifikatsii diskursov [Modus, genre and other classification parameters of discourse]. Voprosy Jazykoznanija (Topics in the study of language). 2009, no. 2, pp. 3‒21.

Kormilitsyna M. A., Novozhenova Z. L. Semanticheskaya struktura predlozheniya v russkom yazyke [Semantic structure of a sentence in the Russian language]. Saratov, SSU Publ., 1985, 42 p.

Kormilitsyna M. A. Semanticheski oslozhnennoe (polipropozitivnoe) prostoe predlozhenie v ustnoy rechi [Semantically complicated (polipropositional) simple sentence in colloquial speech]. Moscow, URSS, 2012, 152 p.

Kormilitsyna M. A., Sirotinina O. B. O strukture razgovornogo teksta [On the structure of the colloquial text]. Voprosy stilistiki. 1999, iss. 28, pp. 92‒103.

Norman B. Yu. Grammaticheskie innovacii v russkom yazyke, svyazannye s social’nymi processami [Grammatical innovations in the Russian language related to social processes]. Rusistika. 1998, no. 1‒2, pp. 57‒68.

Nosek J. Notes on Syntactic Condensation in Modern English. Travaux Linguistiques de Prague. 1964, vol. 1, pp. 281‒288.

Russkaya grammatika: v 2 t. [Russian grammar: in 2 vols]. N. Yu. Shvedova (Ed. in ch.). Moscow, Nauka, 1980, vol. 2: Sintaksis [Syntax]. 709 p.

Sirotinina O. B. Razgovornaya rech’ [Colloquial speech]. In: Funkcional’nye stili i formy rechi [Functional styles and forms of speech]. O. B. Sirotinina (Ed.). Saratov, SSU Publ., 1993, pp.137‒148.

Solganik G. Ya. Obshchaya harakteristika yazyka sovremennyh SMI v sopostavlenii s yazykom SMI predshestvuyushchego perioda [General characteristics of the language of modern media in comparison with the language of the media of the previous period]. In: Yazyk massovoy i mezhlichnostnoy kommunikacii [The language of mass and interpersonal communication]. Ya. N. Zasurskiy (Ed.). Moscow, Media-Mir, 2007, pp. 15‒39.

Starikova E. N. Problema implicitnoy nominacii v sovremennom angliyskom yazyke [The problem of implicit nomination in the modern English language]. Dr. philol. sci. diss. Kiev, 1976, 353 p.

Turner M. Compression and representation. Language and Literature. 2006, vol. 15 (1), pp. 17‒27.

Valgina N. S. Aktivnye processy v sovremennom russkom yazyke [Active processes in the modern Russian language]. Moscow, Logos, 2003, 304 p.

Yagubova M. A. Leksiko-semanticheskoe pole “otsenka” v russkoy razgovornoy rechi [The lexical-semantic field “otsenka” (evaluation) in Russian colloquial speech]. Abstract of Cand. philol. sci. diss. Saratov, 1992, 22 p.

Zemskaya E. A., Kitaygorodskaya M. V., Shiryaev E. N. Russkaya razgovornaya rech’. Obshchie voprosy. Slovoobrazovanie. Sintaksis [Russian colloquial speech. General issue. Word- formation. Syntax]. E. A. Zemskaya (Ed.). Moscow, Nauka, 1988, 277 p.

Zolotova G. A. Kommunikativnye aspekty russkogo sintaksisa [Communicative aspects of the Russian syntax]. Moscow, Nauka, 1982, 368 p.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology