Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Siberian Journal of Philology
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: Specifics of the author’s intention in V. Sorokin’s “Metel”

Authors: E. N. Rogova, L. S. Yanitskiy

Kemerovo State University, Kemerovo, Russian Federation

In the section Study of literature

Issue 4, 2019Pages 168-179
UDK: 82.0DOI: 10.17223/18137083/69/14

Abstract:

The paper analyses “Metel” (The Blizzard) by V. Sorokin, defines the specifics of the author’s intention expressed in the use of the cultural code associated with the traditions of Russian and world literature, in dual coding manifested in the level intended for the mass reader and the game level perceived by the sophisticated recipient. V. Sorokin’s “Metel” is characterized by intertextuality, aimed at activating the reader’s reflection and forming a wide associative field.

To activate the reader’s perception, the author uses thematic and stylistic cliches, as well as the principle of perception contrast: modern genres of mass culture – post-apocalyptic and zombie apocalyptic serve the background for the parodied stylistic elements of classical literature. To avoid epistemological failure, the author uses archetypal images (blizzard, master and servant, horse, ship (sledge)), that act as substantial characteristics against the background of insubstantial ones, insuring understanding of any audience. The archetypal images play the role of modal words in the text, guiding the perception of the text and acting as semantic centers of a sort of fractal narrative, the essence of which is self-resemblance when the whole has the form of its parts. The author’s intention is to use fractal discourse to include numerous artistic elements in the text without changing the triggering algorithm of building the plot devices, which can be symbolically referred to as “death / rebirth” of tradition, genre, the authority of style.

Keywords: V. Sorokin, intention, short novel, cultural code, dual coding, intertextuality

Bibliography:

Blok A. Stikhotvoreniya. Poemy. Vospominaniya sovremennikov [Poems. Memoirs of contemporaries]. Moscow, Pravda, 1989, 692 p.

Bychkov V. V. Estetika. Kratkiy kurs [Aesthetics. Concise course]. Moscow, Proyekt, 2003, 384 p.

Cirlot J. E. Slovar simvolov [Dictionary of symbols]. Moscow, REEL-book, 1994, 608 p.

Filosofskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ [Filosofical encyclopedical dictionary]. S. S. Averintsev, E. A. Arab-Ogly, L. F. Ilichev et al. (Eds). Moscow, Sov. entsiklopediya, 1989, 815 p.

Hall M. P. Entsiklopedicheskoye izlozheniye masonskoy, germeticheskoy, kabbalisticheskoy i rozenkreytserovskoy simvolicheskoy filosofii [Encyclopedic presentation of Masonic, Hermetic, Kabbalistic and Rosenkreutzerian symbolic philosophy]. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1992, vol. 1, 361 p.

Kolosova D. V. Intentsiya kak bazovaya kategoriya tekstovoy deyatel’nosti [Intention as a basic category of textual activity]. The world of Russian word. 2009, no. 3, pp. 28–31.

Krasnov G. V. Kommentarii. L. N. Tolstoy. Voyna i mir [Comments to L. N. Tolstoy. War and peace]. In: Tolstoy L. N. Sobr. soch.: V 22 t. T. 7 [Collected works in 22 vols. Vol. 7]. Moscow, Khudozh. lit., 1981, pp. 367–401.

Meletinskiy E. M. Eruslan Lazarevich. In: Mifologicheskiy slovar’ [Mythological dictionary]. E. M. Meletinskiy (Ed. in ch.). Moscow, Sov. entsiklopedia, 1990, p. 672.

Nagina K. A. “Metel’-strast’” i “metel’-sud’ba” v russkoy literature 19 stoletiya [“Blizzardpassion” and “blizzard-fate” in Russian literature of the 19th century]. Bulletin of Udmurt University. 2010, no. 5–4, pp. 12–20.

Sokolov S. Shkola dlya durakov. Mezhdu sobakoy i volkom. Palisandriya. Esse [School for

fools. Between a dog and a wolf. Palisandriya. Essays]. St. Petersburg, Azbuka-Attikus, 2011, 608 p.

Sokolova E. V. Intentsiya [Intention]. In : Zapadnoye literaturovedeniye 20 veka: Entsiklopediya [Western literary studies of the 20th century: Encyclopedia]. Moscow, Intrada, 2014, 560 p.

Sorokin V. Metel’ [Blizzard]. Moscow, Astrel’, AST, 2010, 304 p.

Tolstoy L. N. Khozyain i rabotnik [Master and servant]. Tolstoy L. N. Sobr. soch.: V 22 t. T. 12: Povesti i rasskazy 1885–1902 gg. [Collected works: In 22 vols. Vol. 12: Novels and stories 1885–1902]. Moscow, Khudozh. lit., 1982, 478 p.

Toporov V. N. Prostranstvo i tekst. Tekst: semantika i struktura [Space and text. Text: semantics and structure]. Moscow, Nauka, 1983, pp. 227–284.

Yurtaeva I. A. Motiv meteli i problema vybora v povesti L. N. Tolstogo “Khozyain i rabotnik” [Motif of blizzard and problem of choice in L. N. Tolstoy’s story “Master and Servant”]. In: Literaturnyy tekst: Problemy i metody issledovaniya. Sb. nauch. tr. T. 6: Aspekty teoreticheskoy poetiki: k 60-letiyu N. D. Tamarchenko [Literary text: problems and methods of study. Coll. of sci. art. Vol. 6: Aspects of theoretical poetics: to the 60th anniversary of N. D. Tamarchenko]. Moscow, Tver’, 2000, 244 p.

Yanitskiy L. S. Lirika i mif (o nekotorykh osobennostyakh liricheskogo diskursa) [Lyrics and myth (On some features of lyrical discourse)]. Philological Sciences. 2004, no. 3, pp. 12–23.

Zenkin S. N. Vvedenie v literaturovedenie. Teoriya literatury [Introduction into literary studies. Literary theory]. Moscow, RSUH, 2000, 81 p.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology