Article

Name: Axiology in literary criticism: main directions of value analysis

Authors: А. V. Filatov

Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation; А. M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation

In the section Study of literature

Abstract:

The paper is devoted to the methodology of axiological approach in literary criticism. This approach, known to many humanities (sociology, psychology, cultural studies, etc.), is aimed at studying the phenomenon of value in art and combines the achievements of the theory of literature and axiology – philosophy of values. Based on the definitions of the terms “approach” and “method”, the author describes two fundamentally different levels of any methodology. The first one represents theoretical and philosophical principles, and the second one − the various stages of analytical and interpretative work with the text. In other words, the approach is included in the method as a theoretical setting. Therefore, several methods can be developed based, for example, on the axiological approach since the situation of value relations (the position of a subject and an object), as well as the specific aspect of artistic content or form to be analyzed, remains variable.

Referring to the history of axiology as a philosophical discipline, the author identifies seven characteristics of the “value” category that are important for this category to be analyzed in the literature. These characteristics include the subject-object nature of value; the relationship between the type of value and its medium; hierarchy; optional character; teleologicity and ontologicity. Then, three levels of axiological research, contributing diverse meaning to the concept of value, are examined in detail. At the level of a literary work, value is understood as a separate element of the artistic world. The subjects of value relations are various narrative instances: implied author, narrator, character and implied reader. At the level of a literary process, the value is a complete literary work, occupying a specific place in the literary hierarchy of a particular culture. The subject of value relations, in this case, is a real reader, including a literary critic and literary scholar. At the level of the writer’s biography, value is a component of his value system, an ideal that is reflected not only in his artistic work but also in non-literary texts (memoirs, journalism, letters) and biographical facts.

Keywords: axiology, value, evaluation, philosophy, literary criticism, value analysis

Bibliography:

Bakhtin M. M. Sobranie sochineniy: V 7 t. [Collected works: in 7 vols]. Moscow, LRC Publishing House, 2003, vol. 1: Filosofskaya estetika 1920-kh godov [Philosophical aesthetics of the 1920s], 955 p.; 2002, vol. 6: “Problemy poetiki Dostoyevskogo”, 1963. Raboty 1960-kh – 1970-kh gg. [“Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics”, 1963. Works of the 1960s – 1970s], 799 p.

Blagoy D. D. Afanasiy Fet – poet i chelovek [Afanasy Fet – a poet and a man]. In: Fet A. A. Vospominaniya [Memoirs]. Moscow, Pravda, 1983, pp. 3–26.

Borev Yu. B. Iskusstvo interpretatsii i otsenki. Opyt prochteniya “Mednogo vsadnika” [The art of interpretation and evaluation. The experience of reading “The Bronze Horseman”]. Moscow, Sov. pisatel’, 1981, 399 p.

Compagnon A. Demon teorii. Literatura i zdravyy smysl [The demon of theory. Literature and common sense]. Moscow, Sabashnikovy Publ., 2001, 336 p.

Esaulov I. A. Literaturovedcheskaya aksiologiya: opyt obosnovaniya ponyatiya [Literary axiology: an attempt at substantiating the phenomenon]. In: Evangel’skiy tekst v russkoy literature 18–20 vekov: tsitata, reministsentsiya, motiv, syuzhet, zhanr [Gospel text in Russian literature of the 18th–20th centuries: quotation, reminiscence, motif, plot, genre]. V. N. Zakharov (Ed.). Petrozavodsk, PetrSU Publ., 1994, iss. 1, pp. 378–383.

Esin A. B. O chekhovskoy sisteme tsennostey [On the value system of A. P. Chechov]. Russkaya slovesnost’. 1994, no. 6, pp. 3–8.

Esin A. B. O tsennostnoy sisteme A. T. Tvardovskogo (“Vasiliy Terkin”) [On the value system of A. T. Tvardovsky (“Vasily Terkin”)]. Russkaya slovesnost’. 1995, no. 5, pp. 34–38.

Filatov A. V. Aksiologicheskiy podkhod k izucheniyu knigi stikhov: ontologicheskiye tsennosti v “Chuzhom nebe” N. S. Gumileva [Axiological approach to the study of poetry book: ontological values in book “The Alien Sky” by Nikolay Gumilev]. The New Philological Bulletin. 2016, no. 3, pp. 119–128.

Filatov A. V. Aksiologicheskiy podkhod k izucheniyu mifopoetiki: adamicheskiy mif v lirike N. S. Gumileva [The axiological approach to the study of mythopoetics: the Adamic Myth in Nikolay Gumilev’s lyrics]. The New Philological Bulletin. 2017, no. 4, pp. 141–149.

Filatov A. V. Aksiologicheskiy podkhod v trudakh V.E. Khalizeva: tsennostnyye oriyentatsii v literature i nauke o ney [The axiological approach in V. E. Khalizev’s works: value orientations in literature and literary criticism]. The New Philological Bulletin. 2018, no. 3, pp. 16–26.

Fukson L. Yu. Problemy interpretatsii i tsennostnaya priroda literaturnogo proizvedeniya [Problems of interpretation and axiological nature of a literary work]. Dr. philol. sci. diss. Kemerovo, 2000, 282 p.

Hartmann N. Estetika [Aesthetics]. Kiev, Nika-Tsentr, 2004, 640 p.

Ingarden R. Issledovaniya po estetike [Studies on aesthetics]. Moscow, Inostr. lit. Publ, 1962. 572 p.

Jauss H. R. Istoriya literatury kak provokatsiya literaturovedeniya [Literary history as provocation of literary theory]. New Literary Observer. 1995, no. 12, pp. 34–84.

Kagan M. S. Filosofskaya teoriya tsennostey [Philosophical theory of values]. St. Petersburg, Petropolis, 1997, 205 p.

Khalizev V. E. Teoriya literatury [The theory of literature]. Moscow, Vyssh. shk., 1999, 398 p.

Khalizev V. E. Tsennostnye orientatsii russkoy klassiki [The value system of Russian classics]. Moscow, Gnozis, 2005, 432 p.

Kikhney L. G., Merkel’ E. V. Aksiologiya povsednevnykh veshchey v poetike akmeizma [The axiology of everyday things in the poetics of akmeism]. Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2015, no. 1, pp. 129–138.

Kolobayeva L. A. Filosofiya i literatura: paralleli, pereklichki i otzvuki (Russkaya literatura 20 veka) [Philosophy and literature: parallels, echoes and reminiscences (Russian literature of the 20th century)]. Moscow, Russkiy impul’s, 2013, 224 s.

Kozhinov V. V. Stat’i o sovremennoy literature [Articles about modern literature]. Moscow, Sov. Rossiya, 1990, 542 p.

Losskiy N. O. Tsennost’ i bytiye. Bog i Tsarstvo Bozhiye kak osnova tsennostey [Value and existence. God and the Kingdom of God as the basis of values]. Paris, YMCA PRESS, 1931, 136 p.

Mukařovský J. Esteticheskaya funktsiya, norma i tsennost’ kak sotsial’nyye fakty [Aesthetic function, norm and value as social facts]. In: Trudy po znakovym sistemam [Sign systems studies]. Tartu, 1975, iss. 7, pp. 243–295.

Nedzvetskiy V. A. Stat’i o russkoy literature 19 – 20 vekov. Nauchnaya publitsistika. Vospominaniya [Articles about Russian literature of 19th – 20th centuries. Scientific journalism. Memoirs]. Nal’chik, Tetragraf, 2011, 628 p.

Nietzsche F. Volya k vlasti. Opyt pereotsenki vsekh tsennostey [The will to power. The experience of revaluation of all values]. Moscow, Kul’turnaya Revolyutsiya, 2005, 880 p.

Novikov A. M., Novikov D. A. Metodologiya: slovar’ sistemy osnovnykh ponyatiy [Methodology: the dictionary of the system of basic concepts]. Moscow, Librokom, 2013, 208 p.

Popova E. V. Tsennostnyy podkhod v issledovanii literaturnogo tvorchestva [Axiological approach to the study of literature]. Dr. philol. sci. diss. Moscow, 2004, 326 p.

Rickert H. Nauki o prirode i nauki o kul’ture [Science of nature and science of spirit]. Moscow, Respublika, 1998, 413 p.

Sartre J.-P. Bytiye i nichto. Opyt fenomenologicheskoy ontologii [Being and nothingness: An essay on phenomenological ontology]. Moscow, Respublika, 2000, 639 p.

Scheler M. Izbrannyye proizvedeniya [Selected works]. Moscow, Gnozis, 1994, 490 p.

Stolovich L. N. Krasota. Dobro. Istina: Ocherki istorii esteticheskoy aksiologii [Beauty. Good. Truth: Essays on the history of aesthetic axiology]. Moscow, Respublika, 1994, 464 p.

Stolovich L. N. Priroda esteticheskoy tsennosti [Nature of aesthetic value]. Moscow, Politizdat, 1972, 272 p.

Sultanov K. K. Natsional’naya samobytnost’ i khudozhestvennaya tsennost’: k voprosu o vzaimodopolnyayemosti etnokul’turnogo diskursa i aksiologicheskogo podkhoda [National identity and artistic value: to the question of complementarity of ethno-cultural discourse and axiological approach]. Studia Litterarum. 2018, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 230–251.

Sultanov K. K. Natsional’noye samosoznaniye i tsennostnyye oriyentatsii literatury [National consciousness and value orientations of literature]. Moscow, IWL RAS, 2001, 200 p.

Voropayev V. A. Dukhom skhimnik sokrushennyy…: zhizn’ i tvorchestvo N. V. Gogolya v svete Pravoslaviya [The Monk saddened by Spirit: N. V. Gogol’s life and work in the light of Orthodoxy]. Moscow, Mosk. rabochiy, 1994, 159 p.

Zobnin Yu. V. Nikolay Gumilev – poet Pravoslaviya [Nikolay Gumilev – the poet of Orthodoxy]. St. Petersburg, SPbUHSS, 2000, 384 p.