Article

Name: Playing Gogol: pastiche as a narrative code (Dostoevsky’s novel “The Double”)

Authors: T. I. Pecherskaya

Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

In the section Study of literature

Abstract: The paper examines the history of reception (from contemporary to later researchers, in particular, formalists) of the novel “The Double” by Dostoevsky. In this novel, Gogol’s influence on the young aspiring writer is clearly pronounced. The “total” character of Gogol’s influence on early Dostoevsky is a philological axiom, with scholars interpreting it in different ways: in terms of style, plot, and character typology. The paper considers the narrative model of the novel. The proposed hypothesis is based on the idea of Gogol’s texts (“The Nose”, “Diary of a Madman”, “The Overcoat”, “Dead Souls”) being extensively used in the novel, forming the narrative model of the story. Anonymous citation is considered to be a determining factor for the narrative model as a whole. The motivation for such a narrative model is given by the figure of the narrator, alter ego of the aspiring writer. The “humble narrator”, author-dilettante, imitates Gogol, “unconsciously” balancing on the brink of parody, but never crossing the style line. Unskilled copying, being a result of excessive diligence of the follower, reproduces the model with absurd superfluity. The writing, composed of quotations from Gogol’s texts and not marked out anywhere graphically, often distorted, creates the effect of a simple and ingenuous rewriting “from memory”. The paper describes various units of unquoted citation and methods of their use. The inversion, distortion, addition, combination and others are considered as main methods of “processing” Gogol’s fragments. A conclusion is drawn that pastiche, involving the fragments of Gogol texts, is key to the narrative code. The author uses the concept “pastiche” in a broad sense. The basic method of pastiche is retained: “seaming” or creating the narrative model from other text’s fragments is saved but subject to another nonlinear compositional principle. The key point of the method can be defined as multiple and multilayered structural impositions of different other text’s fragments within one segment of the narrative field. In conclusion, the question of the need for a special type of commentary on the text constructed in this way is actualized.

Keywords: Dostoevsky, the novel “The Double”, Gogol, narrative code, anonymous citation, pastiche

Bibliography:

Aksakov K. S. Tri kriticheskiye stat’i gospodina Imyarek. III. Peterburgskiy sbornik, izdannyy Nekrasovym [Three critical articles by Mr. Name. III. St. Petersburg collection, published by Nekrasov]. In: Moskovskiy literaturnyy i uchenyy sbornik na 1847 god [Moscow literary and scientific collection in 1847]. Moscow, 1847. Otd. kritiki

Bazylev V. N. Tri istochnika i tri sostavnykh chasti kommentariya (doklad) [Three sources and three components of the commentary (report)]. In: Seminar “Problemy poeticheskogo yazyka”. In-t russkogo yazyka im. V. V. Vinogradova RAN. 23 oktyabrya 2012 g. [Seminar “Problems of poetic language”. V. V. Vinogradov Russian Language Institute RAS, October 23, 2012]. URL: http://www.ruslang.ru/?id=seminar_fateeva_chronicle (accessed 12.10.2018).

Belyy A. Masterstvo Gogolya [Creative writing of Gogol]. Moscow, Leningrad, 1934.

Bem A. L. Dostoevskiy – genial’nyy chitatel’ [Dostoevsky is a brilliant reader]. In: Bem A. L. Issledovaniya. Pis’ma o literature [Researches. Letters about literature]. Moscow, 2001.

Bocharov S. G. Perekhod ot Gogolya k Dostoevskomu [Transition from Gogol to Dostoevsky]. In: Bocharov S. G. O khudozhestvennykh mirakh [About art worlds]. Moscow, 1985.

Chekhov A. P. Poln. sobr. soch. i pisem: V 30 t. [Complete works: in 30 vols]. Moscow, 1985.

Chudakov A. P. Kommentariy [Commentary]. In: Vinogradov V. V. Poetika russkoy literatury [Poetics of Russian literature]. Moscow, 1976.

Chudakov A. P. K probleme total’nogo kommentariya “Evgeniya Onegina” [To the problem of the total commentary on “Eugene Onegin”]. In: Pushkinskiy sbornik [Pushkin collection]. Moscow, 2005.

Gogol’ N. V. Poln. sobr. soch. V 14 t. [Complete works: in 14 vols]. AN SSSR, In-t rus. lit. (Pushkinskiy Dom). Moscow, Leningrad, AN SSSR Publ., 1938, vol. 3; 1949, vol. 5; 1956, vol. 6 (I).

Dilaktorskaya O. G. Peterburgskaya povest’ Dostoevskogo [Dostoevsky’s novel about St. Petersburg]. St. Petersburg, 1999.

Dostoyevskiy F. M. Poln. sobr. soch.: V 30 t. [Complete works: in 30 vols]. Leningrad, Nauka, 1972, vol. 1.

Konstantinova N. V. “Gogolevskiy tekst” v rannikh proizvedeniyakh F. M. Dostoevskogo [“Gogol’s text” in the early works of F. M. Dostoevsky]. Abstract of Philol. Cand. Diss. Novosibirsk, 2006.

Mednis N. E. Sverkhteksty russkoy literatury [Super-texts of Russian literature]. Novosibirsk, 2003.

Pushkin A. S. Sobr. soch.: V 10 t. [Collected works: in 10 vols]. Moscow, 1975.

Toporov V. N. Peterburgskiy tekst russkoy literatury. Izbrannye Trudy [Petersburg text of Russian literature. Selected works]. Petersburg, 2003.

Tynyanov Yu. N. Poetika. Istoriya literatury. Kino [Poetics. History of literature. Cinema]. Moscow, 1977.

Tseytlin A. G. Povesti o bednom chinovnike Dostoevskogo: (K istorii odnogo syuzheta) [The story of the poor official Dostoevsky: (to the story of a plot)]. Moscow, 1923.

Uspenskiy B. A. Poetika kompozitsii [Poetics of composition]. Petersburg, 2000.

Vinogradov V. V. K morfologii natural’nogo stilya (Opyt lingvisticheskogo analiza peterburgskoy poemy “Dvoynik”) [On the morphology of natural style (the Experience of linguistic analysis of the Petersburg poem “Double”)]. In: Vinogradov V. V. Poetika russkoy literatury [Poetics of Russian literature]. Moscow, 1976.

Vinogradov V. V. Stil’ peterburgskoy poemy “Dvoynik” (Opyt lingvisticheskogo analiza) [The style of the Petersburg poem “Double” (Experience of linguistic analysis)]. In: F. M. Dostoevskiy. Stat’i i materialy [Articles and materials]. Petrograd, 1922, coll. 1.

Viktorovich V. A. Gogol’ v tvorcheskom soznanii Dostoevskogo [Gogol in the creative consciousness of Dostoevsky]. In: Dostoevskiy: Materialy i issledovaniya [Dostoevsky: Materials and research]. Petersburg, 1997, vol. 14.