Article

Name: Crisis of sociocultural identity in the classical Russian literature

Authors: V. I. Tyupa

Russian State University for Humanities, Moscow, Russian Federation

In the section Study of literature

Abstract: The paper considers several “wanderer” type characters of Russian classical literature in terms of their narrative identity, starting from Pushkin’s speech by Dostoevsky. Using the category of subjective identity developed by Eric Erickson, as well as the identity separation on the outside recognizable identity of the character and the inner “self” of the person proposed by Paul Rickyer, allowed revealing one of the main trends in the Russian literature of the 19th century. The identity of the central character is problematized, with the internal splitting, non-identity to oneself becoming a plot-forming factor. In particular, Onegin, Bazarov, some of Chekhov’s heroes are shown as personalities in a crisis state suffering from “sociocultural autism.” Also, Chichikov and Andrei Bolkonsky, mentioned by Dostoevsky among the “baseless” heroes, are considered from this perspective. At the same time, in line with Dostoevsky’s interpretation of the image of Tatiana Larina, the author reveals the manifestations of inner integrity, motivated by the personality being rooted in the national culture. Not only Pushkin’s woman character is examined but also the figures of Kate (“Fathers and children”) and Peter (“The Bishop”). However, the extra-crisis integrity of Odintsova by Turgenev or Olenka Plemyannikova by Chekhov is artistically discredited. In later works, the crisis split between character and personality becomes the key innovative factor in Chekhov’s narrative. At the same time, the Russian classic creates such a system of values where it is not stability and strength of character that is of central concern, but the identity of a person – an analogue of national identity, motivated by the national identity of the character.

Keywords: sociocultural identity, narrative identity of the character, Dostoevsky’s Pushkin Speech, Onegin, Tatyana, Bazarov, Bolkonsky, Chichikov, Chekhov’s characters

Bibliography:

Bakhtin М. М. Sobr. soch.: V 7 t. T. 5 [Collected works: In 7 vols. Vol. 5]. Мoscow, 1996.

Chekhov A. P. Poln. sobr. soch. i pisem: V 30 t. T. 10 [Complete collection of compositions and letters: in 30 vols. Vol. 10]. Moscow, 1977.

Dostoyevskiy F. M. Poln. sobr. soch.: V 30 t. T. 26 [Complete coll. of works: In 30 vols. Vol. 26]. Leningrad, 1984, pp. 129–149.

Erikson E. Identichnost’: yunost’ i krizis [Identity: Youth and Crisis]. Transl. from Engl. Мoscow, 1996.

Erikson E. H. Identity and the Life Cycle. New York, 1959.

Erikson E. Tragediya lichnosti [Tragedy of personality]. Transl. from Engl. Мoscow, 2008.

Gogol’ N. V. Mertvyye dushi [Dead Souls]. In: Gogol’ N. V. Sobr. soch.: V 9 t. T. 5 [Collected works: In 9 vols. Vol. 5]. Moscow, Russkaya kniga, 1994.

Mann Yu. V. Turgenev i drugiye [Turgenev and others]. Moscow, RSHU, 2008.

Pushkin A. S. Evgeniy Onegin [Eugene Onegin]. In: Pushkin A. S. Sobr. soch.: V 10 t. T. 4 [Collected works: In 10 vols. Vol. 4]. Moscow, 1960.

Rikër P. Ya-sam kak drugoy [Oneself as another]. Transl. from French. Moscow, 2008.

Tolstoy L. N. Voyna i mir [War and peace]. In: Tolstoy L. N. Poln. sobr. soch.: V 90 t. T. 11 [Complete coll. of works: In 90 vols. Vol. 11]. Moscow, Khudozh. lit., 1940.

Turgenev I. S. Ottsy i deti [Fathers and children]. In: Turgenev I. S. Poln. sobr. soch. i pisem: V 30 t. T. 7 [Complete coll. of works and letters: In 30 vols. Vol. 7]. Moscow, Nauka, 1981.

Tyupa V. I. Fazy mirovogo arkheosyuzheta kak istoricheskoye yadro slovarya motivov [Phases of the archeoplot as the historical core of the dictionary of motifs]. In: Ot syuzheta k motivu [From the plot to motive]. Novosibirsk, 1996.

Tyupa V. I. Paradigmal’nyy arkheosyuzhet v tekstakh Pushkina [Paradigmatic archeoplot in Pushkin’s texts]. In: Ars interpretandi. Novosibirsk, 1997.

Tyupa V. I. Krizis kak invariantnyy konstruktivnyy faktor zhanra rasskaza [Crisis as an invariant constructive factor of the genre of short story]. In: Krizisnyye situatsii i zhanrovyye strategii [Crisis situations and genre strategies]. Мoscow, 2017, pp. 56 –62.

Tyupa V. I. Khudozhestvennost’ chekhovskogo rasskaza [Artistic fatures of Chekhov's Story]. 2nd ed., rev. Мoscow, 2018.