Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Siberian Journal of Philology
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: Image component of the concept ARROGANCE

Authors: Yu. V. Konovalenko

Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

In the section Linguistics

Issue 3, 2019Pages 170-179
UDK: 811.161.1 + 81DOI: 10.17223/18137083/68/15

Abstract: The author analyzes the image component of the concept ARROGANCE in Russian. The investigation is based on the material from the National Corpus of the Russian Language. The concept, being a complex formation, consists of image and script components. The image part can include different elements, for example, perceptive and cognitive ones. A perceptive image can refer to visual, tactile, taste, sound and smell characteristics, and a cognitive image is formed as a result of metaphorical conceptualization. The perceptive element of the ARROGANCE image includes temperature, tactile, visual and taste characteristics, weight and position in space. ARROGANCE is associated with cold temperature, dark and bleak colors, low sounds or silence, bitter taste, dryness, hardness, big size, isolation in space from other objects and top position. A controversial feature of the perceptive element of the image ARROGANCE is its characterization both with the heavy and light weight. This controversy is traced later in the cognitive part of the image, with ARROGANCE being treated as “rock” and “air” metaphors. The cognitive part of the image ARROGANCE is represented in the metaphors: “arrogance is liquid,” “arrogance is air,” “arrogance is a rock,” “arrogance is an illness,” “arrogance is a wild animal,” “arrogance is a barrier” and “arrogance is a destructive force.” A liquid metaphor is common for the concepts characterizing a person’s emotional state. It is explained by the fact that the concept ARROGANCE is a complex one and not only reflects person’s behavior, attitude to other people and characteristics, but also describes his or her emotional state.

Keywords: Russian language, concept, image, perceptive features, cognitive features, metaphor

Bibliography:

Arutyunova N. D. Yazyk i mir cheloveka [Language and human world]. Moscow, LRC Publishing House, 1998, 896 p.

Boldyrev N. N. Kognitivnaya semantika: Sb. st. [Cognitive semantics: coll. of art.]. Moscow, Berlin, Direkt Media, 2016, 222 p.

Burmakova E. A., Marugina N. I. Antropomorfnaya metafora v khudozhestvennom diskurse (na materiale avtobiograficheskikh rasskazov V. M. Shukshina) [Antropomorphical metaphor in artistic discourse (on the material of autobiographic stories by V. M. Shukshin]. Nauchnyy Dialog (Scientific Dialogue). 2015, no. 3 (39), pp. 29–45.

Evans V. How words mean. New York, OUP, 2009, 320 p.

Goldstone R. L., Barsalou L. W. Reuniting perception and conception. Cognition. 1998, no. 65, pp. 231–262. URL: http://www.cogsci.ucsd.edu/~coulson/203/goldstone.pdf (data obrashcheniya 13.06.2018).

Gorbunova L. I. Pertseptivnaya osnova naivnoy kategorizatsii predmetnogo mira [Perceptive base of naïve categorization of object world]. Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2017, no. 48, pp. 5–18.

Kalitkina G. V. Kognitivnaya metafora konteynera i lingvokul’turnaya spetsifika kontseptualizatsii vremeni [Cognitive metaphor of a container and linguo-cultural peculiarities of time conceptualization]. Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2014, no. 6 (32), pp. 17–36.

Krapivkina O. A. Lingvosemioticheskiy analiz kontsepta i ponyatiya (na materiale tekstov nauchnogo i nauchno-populyarnogo diskursa) [Linguo-semiotic analysis of a concept and notion (on the material of texts of scientific and popular scientific discourse)]. The Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Вulletin. 2017, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 209–222.

Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem: Per. s angl. [Metaphors we live by: transl. from English]. A. N. Baranova (Ed.). Moscow, Editorial URSS, 2004, 256 p.

Nikitin M. V. Razvernutyye tezisy o kontseptakh [Extended abstracts on concepts]. Issues of cognitive linguistics. 2004, no. 1, pp. 53–64.

Pimenova M. V. Tipy kontseptov i etapy kontseptual’nogo issledovaniya [Types of concepts and stages of concept investigation]. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2013, vol. 2, no. 2 (54), pp. 127–131.

Popova Z. D., Sternin I. A. Kognitivnaya lingvistika [Cognitive linguistics]. Moscow, AST, 2010, 314 p.

Vorkachev S. G. Kul’turnyy kontsept i znacheniye [Cultural concept and meaning]. In: Trudy Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta. Ser. Gumanitarnyye nauki. [Proceedings of Kuban State Technological University. Ser. Humanities]. 2003, vol. 17, iss. 2, pp. 268–276.

Vorkachev S. G. Obraznaya sostavlyayushchaya kontsepta happiness [Image component of the concept happiness]. In: Anglica selecta: izbrannye raboty po lingvokontseptologii [Anglica selecta: selected works on linguistic conceptology]. Volgograd, 2012, pp. 12–16.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology