Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Siberian Journal of Philology
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: Predicate agreement with the words “r’ad,” “polovina,” “chast’,” “mnozhestvo” in contemporary Russian

Authors: Yulia M. Kuvshinskaya

National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russian Federation

In the section Linguistics

Issue 2, 2019Pages 189-215
UDK: 81: 23, 811.161.1, 81’36DOI: 10.17223/18137083/67/17

Abstract: he work deals with the strategies for predicate agreement to quantified noun groups headed by nouns r’ad, polovina, chast’, mnozhestvo. In Russian, as in other Slavic languages, predicate agreement with quantified noun phrases allows singular or plural forms of the predicate. Three agreement strategies are probable with quantifiers r’ad, polovina, chast’, mnozhestvo: full gram- matical agreement, semantic or default agreement. The study based on the National Russian Cor- pus enabled identifying the frequency and the ratio of the different agreement strategies and showed that the strategies of predicate agreement with quantifiers-nouns are not identical. The predicate is more likely to agree in plural with NP, headed by the word r’ad, than the words polovina, chast’, mnozhestvo. The paper analyses the reasons for the differences in the strategies of predicate agreement. For this purpose, the semantic and grammatical properties of quantifiers and the factors of context that influence the choice of the predicate are considered. The factors of animacy, word order, conjunct subjects and predicates, the type of predicate, adjectives agreed with quantifier are con- sidered in the paper. Some views on the influence of the factors of the context generally accepted in Russian linguistics are clarified. The study has shown that all the factors are extremely im- portant for the predicate agreement with r’ad and a few factors can influence the choice of the form of the predicate agreed with the words pololvina or chast’ – predominantly conjunct noun phrases and animacy.

Keywords: predicate agreement, quantified noun phrases, quantifiers, collective nouns, grammar, Russian language

Bibliography:

Bel’chikov Yu. A. Prakticheskaya stilistika sovremennogo russkogo yazyka [Practical stylistics of the modern Russian language]. Moscow, AST-Press, 2012, 424 p.

Boguslavskiy I. M. Valentnosti kvantornykh slov [Valence of quantifier words]. In: Logicheskiy analiz yazyka. Kvantifikativnyy aspekt yazyka [Logical analysis of the language. Quantitative aspect of the language]. N. D. Arutyunova (Ed.). Moscow, 2005, pp. 139–165.

Bulygina T. V., Shmelev A. D. Mekhanizmy kvantifikatsii v estestvennom yazyke i semantika kolichestvennoy otsenki [Mechanisms of quantification in natural language and the semantics of quantitative evaluation]. In: Referentsiya i problemy tekstoobrazovaniya [The reference and problems of text formation]. Moscow, Institut yazykoznaniya AN SSSR, 1988, pp. 5–18.

Corbett G. G. Agreement in Slavic. Bloomington, Indiana Univ., 1998.

Corbett G. G. Hierarchies, Targets And Controllers: Agreement Patterns in Slavic. London, Croom Helm, 1983.

Corbett G. G. Predicate agreement in Russian. Birmingham, Dept. of Russian Language & Literature, Univ. of Birmingham, 1979.

Corbett G. G. The head of Russian numeral expressions. In: Heads in Grammatical Theory. G. G. Corbett, N. M. Fraser, S. McGlashan (Eds). Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1993, pp. 11–35.

Crockett D. B. Agreement in Contemporary Standard Russian. Cambridge, Slavica Publ., 1976.

Golub I. B. Novyy spravochnik po russkomu yazyku i prakticheskoy stilistike [A new guide to Russian language and practical stylistics]. Moscow, 2008, 464 p.

Gorbachevich K. S. Normy sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo yazyka [The standards of the modern Russian literary language]. Moscow, 1989, 208 p.

Graudina L. K., Itskovich V. A., Katlinskaya L. P. Grammaticheskaya pravil’nost’ russkoy rechi. Opyt chastotno-stilisticheskogo slovarya variantov [Grammatical correctness of Russian speech. The experience of the frequency-stylistic dictionary of variants]. Moscow, Nauka, 1976, 453 p.

Krasovitsky A., Baerman M., Brown D., Corbett G. G., Williams P. Predicate agreement in Russian: a corpus-based approach. Diachronic Slavonic Syntax. Gradual Changes in Focus. Wiener Slawistischer Almanach, Sonderband 74. Munchen, Berlin, Wien, 2010, pp. 109–121.

Kuvshinskaya Yu. M. Soglasovanie skazuemogo s podlezhashchim, vyrazhennym imennoy gruppoy s kolichestvennym znacheniem (po dannym NKRYa za 2000–2010 gg.) [The predicate agreement with the subject, expressed by a noun phrase with a quantitative meaning (according to the RNC data for 2000–2010)]. Russkij yazyk v nauchnom osveshchenii (Russian Language and Linguistic Theory). 2013, no. 2(26), pp. 112–150.

Slovar’ russkogo yazyka: V 4 t. [Dictionary of Russian language: in 4 vols]. A. P. Evgen’eva (Ed.). Moscow, Inst. for Linguistic Studies, RAS, 1999.

Mel’chuk I. A. Kurs obshchey morfologii. T. 2, ch. 2 [Course of general morphology. Vol. 2, pt 2]. Moscow, Vena, LRC Publ. House, Progress, 1998, 544 p.

Plungyan V. A., Rakhilina E. V. Grammatika poryadka [Grammar of order]. In: Trudy Instituta lingvisticheskikh issledovaniy RAN [Proc. of the Inst. of Linguistic Research of the Russian Acad. of Sci.]. 2014, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 542–554. (Acta Linguistica Petropolitana).

Robblee К. Е. Individuation and Russian agreement. Slavic and East European Journal. 1993, vol. 37, pp. 423–441.

Robblee К. Е. Predicate lexicosemantics and case marking under negation in Russian. Russian Linguistics. 1993, vol. 17, pp. 209–236.

Rozental’ D. E. Spravochnik po pravopisaniyu i literaturnoy pravke [Reference book on spelling and literary editing]. Moscow, Ayris-Press, 2010.

Russkaya grammatika [Russian Grammar]. N. Yu. Shvedova (Ed.). Moscow, Nauka, 1980.

Skoblikova E. S. Soglasovaniye i upravleniye kak sposoby sintaksicheskoy organizatsii slov v russkom yazyke [Agreement and coordination as ways of the syntactic organization of words in Russian]. Dr. philol. sci. diss. Kuybyshev, 1969.

Skoblikova E. S. Soglasovaniye i upravleniye v russkom yazyke [Agreement and coordination in Russian language]. Moscow, URSS, KomKniga, 2005.

Suprun A. E. Slavyanskie chislitel’nye (Stanovlenie chislitel’nykh kak osoboy chasti rechi) [Slavic numerals (The development of numerals as a special part of speech)]. Dr. philol. sci. diss. Leningrad, 1965.

Suprun A. E. Slavyanskie chislitel’nye (Stanovlenie chislitel’nykh kak osoboy chasti rechi) [Slavic numerals (The development of numerals as a special part of speech)]. Abstract of Dr. philol. sci. diss. Leningrad, 1965.

Teoriya funktsional’noy grammatiki. Kachestvennost’. Kolichestvennost’ [Theory of func- tional grammar. Qualitativeness. Quantitativeness]. A. V. Bondarko (Ed.). St. Petersburg, Nauka, 1996.

Testelets Ya. G. Vvedenie v obshchiy sintaksis [Introduction to the general syntax]. Moscow, RGGU, 2001.

Trubitsina M. V. Soglasovaniye v konstruktsiyakh s nazvaniyami v russkom yazyke (doklad) [Agreement in constructions with names in Russian (a report)]. In: Tr. Instituta russkogo yazyka im. V. V. Vinogradova. Vyp. 13: Kul’tura russkoy rechi [Proc. of the Inst. of the Russian Language. V. V. Vinogradov. Iss. 13: Culture of the Russian language]. Moscow, 2017, pp. 295–303.

Yakobson R. Izbrannye raboty [Selected Works]. Moscow, Progress, 1985, pp. 210–221.

Yakovenko E. B. Vzyat’ sebe v paru ili nayti svoyu polovinku? (semantika deleniya popolam, uvelicheniya vdvoye i parnosti v raznykh yazykakh) [Take a couple or find your soul mate? (semantics of division in half, doubling and pairing in different languages)]. In: Logicheskiy analiz yazyka. Chislovoy kod v raznykh yazykakh i kul’turakh [Logical analysis of the language. Numeric code in different languages and cultures]. Moscow, URSS, Lenand, 2014, pp. 80–88.

Yanovich I. S., Fedorova O. V. Analiz rechevykh oshibok pri predikativnom soglasovanii v russkom yazyke: effekt roda glavnogo imeni [Analysis of speech errors in the predicative agreement in the Russian language: the effect of the gender of the main name]. In: Komp’yuternaya lingvistika i intellektual’nyye tekhnologii: Tr. mezhdunar. konf. “Dialog 2006,” Bekasovo, 31 maya – 4 iyunya 2006 g. [Computer linguistics and intellectual technologies: Proc. of the intern. conf. “Dialogue 2006,” (Bekasovo, May 31 – June 4, 2006 g.)]. Moscow, Izd. RGGU, 2006.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology