Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Siberian Journal of Philology
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: Chaplin in Yuri Olesha’s narrative

Authors: Galina A. Zhilicheva

Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

In the section Study of literature

Issue 2, 2019Pages 111-123
UDK: 821.161.1DOI: 10.17223/18137083/67/11

Abstract: This paper deals with the role of the “Chaplin code” in Yuri Olesha’s narrative. Olesha’s journal entries, essays, and literary works are analyzed regarding his personal “cinematic poetics.” This work suggests that Olesha views the relationships between the languages of cinema and literature as a form of synthesis and, at the same time, as a conflicting communication. His works show visual phantasmata not only as being universal in different forms of art but also as being essentially antithetic to one another. Olesha’s journal entries refer to Chaplin’s method as a mixture between poetic sentiment and buffoonery. Moreover, Olesha regards Chaplin as a self-referential figure who contaminates the traits of a poet and a trickster and represents a part of a larger personal myth of an artist who (metaphysically) becomes a beggar in the “new world.” In Olesha’s literary works, the presence of characters who refer to “the Tramp” or share some of his attributes can influence the intrigue (adding the motifs of circus, theatre, and cinema) as well as the structure of the narrative (changing narrative tense and narrative voice). For example, in “Zavist’ (Envy),” Kavalerov and Ivan Babichev both share some of “the Tramp’s” features (appearance, clothing, stagey behavior, lack of money). In addition, the text sometimes refers to both of them as “comedians.” The paper concludes with the claim that the “Chaplin code” plays several metanarrative roles: it indexes the “balagan-type” worldview, serves as a key element of cinematic poetics, and, overall, becomes the essential part of Olesha’s ideas regarding the nature of artistic creation.

Keywords: Chaplin, Yu. Olesha, cinematic poetics, metanarration, personal myth

Bibliography:

Balázs B. Kul’tura kino [Culture of Film]. Leningrad, Gos. izd., 1925, 90 p.

Bassel A. Stikhotvornyy tekst kak simfoniya kinopriemov (Eksperi-mental’nyy analiz stikhotvoreniya O. E. Mandel’shtama “K nemetskoy rechi”) [Poetic text as a symphony of cinematographic devices (an experimental analysis of O. Mandelstam’s poem “To the German tongue”)]. RSUH Bulletin. Series: History. Philology. Cultural Studies. Oriental Studies. 2015, no. 2, pp. 73–84.

Beaujour E. The invisible land: A study of the artistic imagination of Iurii Olesha. New York; London, Columbia Univ. Press, 1970, 222 p.

Blumbaum A. B. Ozhivayushchaya statuya i voploshchennaya muzyka: konteksty “Strogogo yunoshi” [The animated statue and music incarnate: Contexts of “a strict young man”]. New Literary Observer. 2008, no. 89. URL: http://magazines.russ.ru/nlo/2008/89/bl10.html (accessed 20.12.2018).

Burenina O. D. Simvolistskiy absurd i ego traditsii v russkoy literature i kul’ture pervoy poloviny XX veka [Symbolist absurd and its traditions in Russian literature and culture of the first half of the 20th century]. St. Petersburg, Aleteyya, 2005, 322 p.

Casseres de В. The Hamlet-Like Nature of Charlie Chaplin. The New York Times. 1920, Dec. 12. URL: https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1920/12/12/112665536.pdf (accessed 17.11.2018).

Chaplin Ch. S. Moya biographiya [My autobiography]. Moscow, Iskusstvo, 1966, 496 p.

Cherashnyaya D. I. Fenomen ‘poslednego dnya poeta’ (Stikhi O. Mandel’shtama maya – iyulya 1937 g.) [The phenomenon of ‘the poet’s last day’ (The works of Osip Mandelstam from May to July, 1937)]. Philological Class. 2011, no. 25, pp. 22–27.

Delez Zh. Kino [Cinema]. Moscow, Ad Marginem, 2004, 624 p.

Delez Zh., Gvattari F. Anti-Edip: kapitalizm i shizofreniya [Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia]. Ekaterinburg, U-Faktoriya, 2007, 672 p.

Efimenko A. E. K. Zholkovskiy i Yu. K. Shcheglov: poiski porozhdeniya teksta [K. Zholkovskiy and Yu. K. Shcheglov: searching for the text generation]. In: Professiya: literator. God rozhdeniya: 1937: kollektivnaya monografiya [Occupation: author. Date of birth: 1937: a joint monograph]. Elets, Elets Univ. Publ., 2017, pp. 163–173.

Gudkova V. Yu. Olesha i Vs. Meyerkhol’d v rabote nad spektaklem “Spisok blagodeyaniy” [Yuri Olesha and Vsevolod Meyerhold at work at the production of “A list of blessings”]. Moscow, NLO, 2002, 604 p.

Khanzen-Leve O. Intermedial’nost’ v russkoy kul’ture. Ot simvolizma k avangardu [Intermediality in Russian culture. From symbolism to avant-garde]. Moscow, RSUH, 2016, 450 p.

Kulikova Е. Yu. O mandel’shtamovskom puteshestvii k Viyonu [On Mandelstam’s voyage to Villon]. Bulletin of Udmurt Univ. History and Philology. 2010, no. 4, pp. 3–11.

Mukařovský J. Opyt strukturnogo analiza akterskoy individual’nosti (Chaplin v “Ognyah bol’shogo goroda”) [An attempt at a structural analysis of an actors figure (Chaplin in “City Lights”)]. In: Mukařovský J. Issledovaniya po estetike i teorii iskusstva [Aesthetics and art theory studies]. Moscow, Iskusstvo, 1994, pp. 420–427.

Olesha Yu. Kniga proshhaniya [The goodbye book]. Moscow, Pro-zaIK, 2015, 494 p.

Olesha Yu. Mysli o Chapline [Thoughts on Chaplin]. In: Olesha Yu. Ni dnya bez strochki: romany, povesti, rasskazy, p’esy, stat’i, vospo-minaniya [No day without a line: collected novels, short stories, plays, essays, and memoirs]. St. Petersburg, Azbuka, Moscow, Azbuka-Atticus, 2015, pp. 964–967.

Olesha Yu. Zagovor chuvstv: p’esa [The conspiracy of feelings: a play]. In: Olesha Yu. Ni dnya bez strochki: romany, povesti, rasskazy, p’esy, stat’i, vospominaniya [No day without a line: collected novels, short stories, plays, essays, and memoirs]. St. Petersburg, Azbuka, Moscow, Azbuka-Atticus, 2015, pp. 385–439.

Olesha Yu. Zagovor chuvstv: stat’ya [The Conspiracy of Feelings: An Essay]. In: Olesha Yu. Ni dnya bez strochki: romany, povesti, rasskazy, p’esy, stat’i, vospominaniya [No day without a line: collected novels, short stories, plays, essays, and memoirs]. St. Petersburg, Azbuka, Moscow, Azbuka-Atticus, 2015, pp. 852–855.

Olesha Yu. Strogiy yunosha [A Severe Young Man]. In: Olesha Yu. Ni dnya bez strochki: romany, povesti, rasskazy, p’esy, stat’i, vospo-minaniya [No day without a line: collected novels, short stories, plays, essays, and memoirs]. St. Petersburg, Azbuka, Moscow, Azbuka-Atticus, 2015, pp. 498–549.

Olesha Yu. Spisok blagodeyaniy [A List of Benefits]. In: Olesha Yu. Ni dnya bez strochki: romany, povesti, rasskazy, p’esy, stat’i, vospominaniya [No day without a line: collected novels, short stories, plays, essays, and memoirs]. St. Petersburg, Azbuka, Moscow, Azbuka-Atticus, 2015, pp. 439–498.

Olesha Yu. Zavist’ [Envy]. Moscow, Vagrius, 1999, 414 p.

Smirnov I. P. Roman i smena epoh: ‘Zavist’ Yuriya Oleshi [The novel and the end of an era: Yuri Olesha’s ‘Envy’]. Zvezda. 2012, no. 8, pp. 11–19.

Smirnov I. P. Videoryad. Istoricheskaya semantika kino [Visuals: Historical semantics of cinema]. St. Petersburg, Petropolis, 2009, 402 p.

Tarasov A. V. Kinematograf M. A. Bulgakova. K probleme kinemato-grafichnosti hudozhestvennogo myshleniya pisatelya [The cinema of Michail Bulgakov: On the issue of cinematic artistic mentality of the writer]. Abstract of Cand. culturol. sci. diss. Yaroslavl’, 2006, 23 p.

Tsivian Yu. G. Istoricheskaya retseptsiya kino. Kinematograf v Rossii 1896–1930 [The historical reception of the cinema. Russian films from 1896 to the 1930s]. Riga, Zinātņe, 1991, 492 p.

Yangirov R. M. “Chuvstvo fil’ma”: zametki o kinematograficheskom kontekste v literature russkogo zarubezh’ya 1920–1930-kh godov [“The Sense of Film”: Notes on the cinematic context in the literature of the Russian emigration in the 1920–1930s]. In: Imperiya N. Nabokov i nasledniki [Empire N: Nabokov and heirs]. Moscow, NLO, 2005, pp. 399–429.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology