Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Siberian Journal of Philology
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: Grammaticalization of Tuvan models of bipredicative constructions: subject constructions

Authors: Ludmila A. Shamina

Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

In the section Linguistics

Issue 3, 2018Pages 246-254
UDK: 81’366; 81’367DOI: 10.17223/18137083/64/22

Abstract: The paper focuses on the issues of grammaticalization of Tuvan verbal constructions (VC). The author analyses specific lexical elements of the bipredicative models resulting in the formation of new (monopredicative) models on the basis of constructions with nominal predicates. It is predicative units (SPU) and meanings expressed by them. Lexemes with an ability to evaluate dictum positions expressed by predicative subjects serve as predicates of main predicative units (MPU). The paper studies the grammaticalized SPU that formally fulfil the subject functions and serve primarily to record the results of mental operations regarding the events of reality (evaluation, classification, identification, etc.). The pragmatic evaluative component of lexemes demonstrates the speaker’s attitude towards the denoted object or the addressee of one’s speech, and also carries the specific information regarding the speech actions that may be performed with the help of these lexemes. Based on evaluative semantics, the formally main PU is replaced by pronouns, verbs, and (in most cases) evaluative lexemes, resulting in the emergence of regular, frequent grammaticalized constructions. Such constructions, confirming the existence/nonexistence of various facts, their certainty/ uncertainty, and their correlation with various circumstances (or lack thereof) by means of their evaluative components, can be defined as grammaticalized syntactic (analytical) constructions, with predicates possessing broad evaluative meanings. Such models of subject constructions may be used to broaden the variety of characteristics of finite predicates. Unlike the bipredicative complement constructions, these grammaticalized constructions contain lexical forms that lack case valence in their modus predicates.

Keywords: bipredicative constructions, grammaticalization, models, subject constructions, predicates, analytical constructions, Tuvan language

Bibliography:

Arutyunova N. D. Predlozhenie i ego smysl: Logiko-semanticheskie problemy [Sentence and its meaning: Issues of logic and semantics]. Moscow, Nauka, 1976, 383 p.

Arutyunova N. D. Semanticheskaya spetsifika imen litsa i imen predmetov [Semantic traits of personal names and names of objects]. In: Arutyunova N. D. Yazyk i mir cheloveka [Language and world of humans]. Moscow, LRC Publ. House, 1999, pp. 61–64.

Cheremisina M. I., Brodskaya L. M., Gorelova L. M., et al. Predikativnoe sklonenie prichastiy v altaiskikh yazykakh [Predicative declination of participles in Altai languages]. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1984, 191 p.

Strukturnyye tipy sinteticheskikh polipredikativnykh konstruktsiy v yazykakh raznykh sistem [Structural types of polipredicative synthetic constructions in languages of various systems]. Novisibirsk, Nauka, 1986, 320 p.

Cheremisina M. I. Nekotorye voprosy teorii slozhnogo predlozheniya v yazykakh raznykh sistem [Some issues of theory of complex sentences in languages of various systems]. Novosibirsk, NSU Publ., 1979, 82 p.

Cheremisina M. I. Ob iz”yasnitel’noy konstruktsii s fakul’tativnym upravlyayemym mestoimeniyem “to” [On complement clauses with optional subordinate pronoun to]. In: Funktsional’nyy analiz sintaksicheskikh struktur [Functional analysis of syntactic structures]. Irkutsk, Irkutsk Univ. Publ., 1982, pp. 3–21.

Kobozeva I. M. Lingvisticheskaya semantika [Linguistic semantics]. Moscow, Editorial URSS, 2000, 352 p.

Koshkareva N. B. Ob osobennostyakh predstavleniya nauchnogo znaniya yazykom estestvennykh nauk [On the features of representation of scientific knowledge in the language of natural sciences]. Critique and semiotics. Iss. 14, Novosibirsk, 2010, pp. 360–372.

Melchuk I. A. Kurs obschei morfologii. T. 2: Morfologicheskie znacheniya [Course of general morphology. Vol. 2: Morphological meanings]. Moscow, LRC Publ. House, 1998, 544 p.

Shamina L. A. Modeli iz”yasnitel’nykh polipredikativnykh konstruktsiy s imennymi skazuyemymi v tuvinskom yazyke [Models of Tuvan polipredicative complement constructions with nominal predicates]. In: Yazyki korennykh narodov Sibiri [Native languages of Siberia]. Iss. 5, Novosibirsk, 1999, pp. 70–84.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology