Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Siberian Journal of Philology
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: Turkic-Mongolian parallels among the terms of spiritual culture in Mongolian languages

Authors: Valentin I. Rassadin, Svetlana M. Trofimova, Luvsandorzh Bold

Kalmyk State University, Elista, Russian Federation; Institute of Language and Literature of the Mongolian Academy of Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

In the section Linguistics

Issue 3, 2018Pages 222-231
UDK: 811.512.3DOI: 10.17223/18137083/64/20

Abstract: The paper is devoted to the comparative-historical study of some terms related to the sphere of spiritual culture of the Mongolian languages – Khalkha-Mongolian, Buryat, Kalmyk and oldwritten Mongolian, and also in some of their dialects that have Turkic parallels. This is due to the fact that Mongolian and Turkic languages have been interacting with each other for millennia and interpenetrating in the field of vocabulary. However, there is still no list of these common lexical elements, so that it would be realistic to assess this lexical interpenetration by establishing the origin of each lexeme and finally solving the question of the existence in the distant past of the existence of a hypothetical Turkic-Mongolian proto-language. It is most rational to study the general Turkic-Mongolian lexicon within the framework of semantic groups. For the analysis, the terms of colour designation, the names of some of the most characteristic musical instruments, the names of the species of shamans and certain terms of the Buddhist religion that are deeply attached to the sphere of spiritual culture were taken. The comparative material shows that all these Mongolian terms have Turkic parallels, the Turkic etymology of which is beyond doubt. All the considered common Turkic-Mongolian words are well etymologized from the Turkic languages, which indicates their borrowed character in the Mongolian languages. Moreover, this borrowing took place in the era of the proto-languages as a result of close contacts of the Mongolian tribes with the Turkic, specifically – with the Bulgarian-type tribes, as these Turkic words spread throughout Mongolian languages as the Mongolian ethnos expanded and modern Mongolian languages were formed. Such penetration of Turkic lexicon into the Mongolian languages and its full adaptation occurred already in antiquity at the level of proto-languages as a result of various contacts and interaction of Mongolian and Turkic ethnoses.

Keywords: vocabulary, Turko-Mongolian parallels, spiritual culture, terms of color designation, names of musical instruments, shamanic terms, Buddhist terms, Turkic etymology, historical contacts, interaction of ethnoses

Bibliography:

Banzarov D. Chernaya vera, ili shamanstvo u mongolov [Black faith, or shamanism in the Mongols]. In: Banzarov D. Sobraniye sochineniy [Collected works]. Moscow, 1955, pp. 48–100.

Buryatsko-russkiy slovar’: 44 000 slov [Buryat-Russian dictionary: 44 000 words]. K. M. Cheremisov (Comp.). Moscow, 1973.

Drevnetyurkskiy slovar’ [Ancient Turkic dictionary]. Leningrad, Nauka, Leningr. otd., 1969, 677 p.

Dugarov B. S. Istoricheskiye korni belogo shamanstva: na materiale obryadovogo fol’klora buryat [Historical roots of white shamanism: On the material of Buryat ritual folklore]. Moscow, Nauka, 1991, 300 p.

Kotvich V. L. Issledovaniya po altayskim yazykam [Studies of Altaic languages]. Moscow, izd. inostr. lit., 1962, 371 p.

Manzhigeev I. A. Buryatskiye shamanisticheskiye i doshamanisticheskiye terminy: opyt ateisticheskoy interpretatsii [Buryat shamanistic and pre-Shamanistic terms: Experience of atheistic interpretation]. Moscow, Nauka, 1978, 128 p.

Mikhaylov T. M. Iz istorii buryatskogo shamanizma (s drevneyshikh vremen po XVIII v.) [From the history of Buryat shamanism (from ancient times to the 18th century)]. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1980, 320 p.

Mikhaylov G. I. Nekotoryye zamechaniya o mongol’skikh slovakh “bөө” i “udgan” [Some remarks on the Mongolian words “bөө” and “udgan”]. Yazyk i literatura. 1975, vol. 10, pp. 87–93.

Potapov L. P. Altayskiy shamanism [Altai shamanism]. Leningrad, Nauka, Leningr. otd., 1991, 320 p.

Ramstedt G. J. Kalmückisches Wӧrterbuch. (Lexica Societatis Fenno-Ugricae; 3.). Helsinki, 1935, 411 p.

Räsänen M. Versuch eines etymologischen Wörterbuchs der Türksprachen. Helsinki, 1969, 532 p. (Lexica Societatis Fenno-Ugricae; 17:1.)

Sanzheyev G. D. Mongol’skiye terminy udkha, bөle i bүlү [Mongolian terms udkha, bөle i bүlү]. In: Mongol’skiy lingvisticheskiy sbornik [Mongolian linguistic collection]. Moscow, 1985, pp. 99–104.

Sečenčoγtu. Mongγol üges-ün iǰaγur-un toli [Root dictionary of Mongolian vocabulary]. Rinčingava, Soyoltu kinaba. Kökeqota, 1988, 2973 p.

Sravnitel’no-istoricheskaya grammatika tyurkskikh yazykov. Leksika [Grammar of Turkic languages in comparative and historical aspect. Vocabulary]. Moscow, Nauka, 2001, 822 p.

Starinnoye mongol’skoye skazaniye o Chingisckane [An ancient Mongolian legend about Genghis Khan]. Transl. from chinees, notes by arck. Palladiy [P. I. Kafarov]. In: Trudy chlenov Rossiyskoy Duckovnoy Missii v Pekine [The works of the members of the Russian spiritual mission in Beijing.]. St. Petersburg, 1866, vol. 4, 258 p. + table.

Todayeva B. Kh. Yazyk mongolov vnutrenney Mongolii: Materialy i slovar’ [The language of the Mongols of Inner Mongolia: Materials and vocabulary]. Moscow, Nauka, 1981, 276 p.

Tsybikov G. Ts. Shamanizm u buryat-mongolov [Shamanism in the Buryat-Mongols]. In: Tsybikov G. Ts. Izbr. tr. 2-e izd., pererab. [Selected works. 2nd ed.]. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1991. Vol. 2: O Tzentral’nom Tibete, Мongolii i Buryatii [About Central Tibet, Mongolia and Buryatia]. R. Е. Pubaev (Ed.). pp 164–171.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology