Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
  
Siberian Journal of Philology
По-русски
Archive
Editorial board
Our ethical principles
Submission Requirements
Process for Submission & Publication
List of Typos
Search:

Author:

and/or Keyword:

Article

Name: Derivative modelling of genre (on the example of a legal triller)

Authors: O. N. Zherdeva, E. A. Savochkina

Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Barnaul, Russian Federation; Altai State University, Barnaul, Russian Federation

In the section Study of literature

Issue 2, 2017Pages 123-135
UDK: 80:800, 81’13DOI: 10.17223/18137083/59/9

Abstract: The paper deals with system-structural and historical-theoretical approaches to the study of the system of the genres of literature. Basing on the historical-theoretical approach, permitting one to embed a genre into its epoch with its target reader, the author proposes a model of derivation of legal thriller genre within the paradigm of mass literature. The derivation theory enables one to look into the mechanisms behind formation of secondary units and to understand them, to investigate the nature of the relationship between these secondary units and the ones that can be regarded as primary to them. First of all, we consider the form of the genre as a mutual component for both detective story and thriller. As for the content of both creates the distance differentiating detective story from thriller. The main formal and content characteristics which have been proved to pertain to both detective story and thriller are the following: key antagonists in the plot; one of the antagonists being after the other; thrilling plot and dynamic narration. The genres of detective and thriller are proved to share common characteristics of adventure literature. The detective and the criminal are viewed upon as key antagonists present in detective stories as well as thrillers, the detective being after the criminal. The first step to establish the derivational link between the genres discussed is to determine the primary and the secondary one. This work is of an inductive character. Since we know the detective story to historically appear before thriller, we take it to be the preliminary unit of derivational process. The paper considers thriller as derivative from the genre of detective when the content of the latter is modified through changes in expression on the non-linear stage of text creation – antagonists and setting are changed – while preserving expressive means on the linear stage (common genre pertaining plot development). The legal thriller is stated as a separate genre on the basis of its content – the antagonists meet in the courtroom – when formal features of the genre of detective (tense and dynamic narration) are still preserved. The paper offers a definition of the legal thriller and discusses its genre structure.

Keywords: derivation, stage of derivation, chain of derivation, derivational textology

Bibliography:

Barthes R. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika. Poetika [Selected works: Semiotics. Poetics]. Moscow, Progress, Univers, Reya, 1994, 616 p.

Beglov V. A. Aktual’nye voprosy teorii literatury [Actual issues of the theory of literature]. Sterlitamak, 2002, 244 p.

Brodey K., Malgaretti F. Focus on English and American literature Moscow, Ayriss-Press, 2003, 399 p.

Chernets L. V. Literaturnye zhanry (Problemy tipologii i poetiki) [Genres of literature (Issues of typology and poetics)]. Moscow, Izd. Moskovskogo univ., 1982, 192 p.

Chuvakin A. A. Derivatsionnye otnosheniya kak tip mezhtekstovykh otnosheniy (k predmetu tekstoderivatologii) [Derivational relations as a type of intertextual relations (to the issue of text derivation)]. In: Aktual’nye problemy derivatologii, motivologii, leksikografii: Sb. nauch. tr. [Actual problems of derivatology, motivology, lexicography: Collect. of sci. works]. Tomsk, 1998, pp. 23–24.

Croce B. Estetika kak nauka o vyrazhenii i kak obshchaya lingvistika [Aesthetics as a science of expression and as a general linguistics]. Moscow, Intrada, 2000, 160 p.

Dejk T. A. Yazyk. Poznanie. Kommunikatsiya [Language. Cognition. Communication]. Moscow, Progress, 1989, 312 p.

Eco U. Zametki na polyakh “Imeni rozy” [Postscript to “The name of the rose”]. St. Petersburg, Simpozium, 2003, 93 p.

Faryno E. Vvedenie v literaturovedenie [Introduction into literary Studies]. St. Petersburg, Izd. RGPU, 2004, 639 p.

Fowler A. Kinds of Literature. An Introduction to the theory of genres and modes. Oxford, 1983, 183 p.

Gritsanov A. A., Mozheyko M. A. (Eds). Postmodernizm: Entsiklopediya [Postmodernism: Encyclopedia]. Minsk, Interpresservis; Kn. dom, 2001, 1038 p.

Hernadi P. Beyond genre. New directions in literary classification

. London, 1972, 125 p.

Khalizev V. E. Teoriya literatury [Theory of literature]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola, 1999, 398 p.

Khrakovskiy V. S. Teoriya yazykoznaniya. Rusistika. Arabistika [Theory of linguistics. Russian studies. Arabian studies]. St. Petersburg, Nauka, 1999, 449 p.

Kormilov S. I. Zhanr [Genre]. In: Sovremennyy slovar’-spravochnik po literature [Modern dictionary of literature]. Moscow, AST, Olimp, 1999, 184 p.

Kubryakova E. S., Pankrats, Yu. G. O tipologii protsessov derivatsii [On the typology of derivation processes]. In: Teoreticheskie aspekty derivatsii: Mezhvuzovskiy sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Theoretical aspects of derivation: Cross university collected works]. Perm’, Izd. Permskogo univ., 1982, pp. 7–18.

Kuz’michev I. K. Literaturnye perekrestki: Tipologiya zhanrov, ikh istoricheskaya sud’ba [Literary crossroads: Typology of genres, their historical fate]. Gor’kiy, Volgo-Vyatskoe knizhnoe izd., 1983, 208 p.

Kuz’michev I. K. Vvedenie v obshchee literaturovedenie XXI veka [Introduction into general theory of literature of the 21st century]. Nizhniy Novgorod, 2001, 324 p.

Likhachev D. S. Istoricheskaya poetika russkoy literatury [Historical poetics of Russian literature]. St. Petersburg, Aleteyya, 1997, 508 p.

Lukov V. A. Istoriya literatury: Zarubezhnaya literatura ot istokov do nashikh dney [History of literature: foreign literature from origin to modern times]. Moscow, Akademiya, 2003, 512 p.

Martem’yanov Yu. S. Logika situatsiy. Stroenie teksta. Terminologichnost’ slov [Logic of situation. Text structure. Terminology of words]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoy kul’tury, 2004, 1055 p.

Medvedev P. N. Formal’nyy metod v literaturovedenii [Formal method in literary studies]. In: M. M. Bakhtin. Tetralogiya [Tetralogy]. Moscow, Labirint, 1998, pp. 248–261.

Mel’cuk I. A. The Russian language in the meaning – Text perspective. Moskau, Wien, 1995, 682 p.

Mel’nikov N. G. Massovaya literatura [Mass literature]. Russkaya slovesnost’. 1998, no. 5, pp. 6–12.

Mentsel’ B. Chto takoe “populyarnaya literatura”? [What is popular literature”?]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 1999, no. 40, pp. 391–407.

Merriam Webster’s encyclopedia of literature. Springfield, Massachusetts, 1995, 685 p.

Mikhaylov A. D. Frantsuzskiy geroicheskiy epos: Voprosy poetiki i stilistiki [French heroic epic: Issues of poetics and style]. Moscow, Nasledie, 1995, 360 p.

Nikolaev D. D. Detektiv [Detective]. In: A. N. Nikolyukin (Ed.). Literaturnaya Entsiklopediya Terminov i Ponyatiy [Encyclopedia of literate terms and notions]. Moscow, Intelvak, 2001, 223 p.

Nikolina N. A. Filologicheskiy analiz teksta: Ucheb. posobie dlya studentov vyssh. ped. ucheb. zavedeniy [Philological analysis of the text: Tutorial for students of pedagogical training institutions]. Moscow, Akademiya, 2003, 256 p.

Nikolyukin A. N. Triller [Thriller]. In: A. N. Nikolyukin (Ed.). Literaturnaya entsiklopediya terminov i ponyatiy [Literary encyclopedia of terms and notions]. Moscow, Intelvak, 2001, 1097 p.

Propp V. Ya. Morfologiya skazki. Istoricheskie korni volshebnoy skazki [Morphology of fairytale. Historic roots of magic fairytale]. Moscow, Labirint, 2000, 336 p.

Romanova G. Literaturnoe proizvedenie kak khudozhestvennoe edinstvo (forma i soderzhanie) [Literate work as artistic unity (form and content)]. In: Literaturnaya Ucheba. 2004, vol. 1, pp. 199–202.

Tamarchenko N. D. Metodologicheskie problemy teorii roda i zhanra v poetike XX veka [Methodological issues of gender and genre theory in the poetics of the 20th century]. In: Teoriya literatury: V 3 t. T. 3: Rody i zhanry (osnovnye problemy v istoricheskom osveshchenii) [Theory of literature: in 3 vols. Vol. 3: Genders and genres (main problems in historical interpretation)]. Moscow, IMLI RAN, 2003, 592 p.

Timofeev L. I., Turaev S. V. Zhanr [Genre]. In: Slovar’ literaturovedcheskikh terminov [Dictionary of literate terms]. Moscow, Prosveshchenie, 1974, 509 p.

Tomashevskiy B. V. Teoriya literatury. Poetika [Theory of literature. Poetics]. Moscow, Aspekt press, 2003, 334 p.

Tynyanov Yu. N. Literaturnaya evolyutsiya: Izbrannye trudy [Literary evolution: Selected works]. Moscow, Agraf, 2002, 496 p.

Shatin Yu. V. Khudozhestvennaya tselostnost’ i zhanroobrazovatel’nye protsessy [Artistic integrity and genre-forming processes]. Novosibirsk, 1991, 192 p.

Wellek P., Warren A. Theory of literature. London, 1985, 368 p.

Woeller W., Cassiday B. The Literature of crime and detection. Leipzig, 1988, 213 p.

Zhirmunskiy V. M. Teoriya literatury. Poetika. Stilistika [Theory of Literature. Poetics. Stylistics]. Leningrad, Nauka, 1977, 407 p.

Zholkovskiy A. K., Shcheglov Yu. K. Raboty po Hoetike Vyrazitel’nosti: Invarianty – Tema – Priemy – Tekst [Works on Poetics of Expression: Invariants – Theme – Methods – Text]. Moscow, Progress, Univers, 1996, 343 p.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology