Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737
Roskomnadzor certificate number Эл № ФС 77-84784 
Critique and Semiotics
По-русски
Archive
Submission requirements
Process for Submission and Publication
Editor′s office
Editorial Board and Editorial Council
Our ethical principles
Search:


Email: silantev@post.nsu.ru

Article

Name: “Chopin, sea of tears…”: around a poem by Marcel Proust

Authors: N. O. Laskina

“Otkrytaya kafedra” education centre

Issue 2, 2017Pages 213-228
UDK: 821.133.1.0DOI:

Abstract: Proust’s rare poetic endeavours seem to be the least significant part of his corpus, but their existence itself poses some serious questions. His only published lyrical cycle, “Portraits de peintres et de musiciens”, is usually interpreted only as a part of “Les Plaisirs et le Jours”, the writer’s first book. The book’s fragmented and multigenre structure certainly makes the unexpected poetry section less puzzling – yet it does not explain what role would these eight poems play in the genesis of “À la recherche du temps perdu” or why Proust lost all ambitions as a would-be poet so early (while occasionally writing poetry as part of his private literary or intimate exchanges). This paper proposes to examine one of the published poems, “Chopin”, as a departure point for some of Proust’s recurring themes and to explain why their development on the way to the novel excluded returning to the art of poetry. The analysis of “Chopin”’s poetics reveals some important contradictions and shows early Proust’s aesthetic uncertainty. An obvious intertextual link to Baudelaire’s poem “Les Phares” is misleading, since “Chopin”, as well as the whole sequence, does not really explore any of Baudelaire’s titanic imagery; painters and composers serve as sources of random and ephemeral impressions rather than awe. One of the poem’s key words – “larme” (“tear”) – radically changes meaning and function from the literal depiction of a torrid emotional life to the purely rhetorical “tear of Hope” in the last verse. A rather unoriginal interpretation of Chopin’s music (inspired most likely by Reynaldo Hahn’s explanations more than by Proust’s personal idea on music) contrasts with the extremely personal image of the sick artist isolated in his room. The poem, far from being a masterpiece, can give us some interesting insights, if we reconstruct all aspects of the Chopin theme in the novel and its avant-texte. First, in “Contre Saint-Beuve” Proust repeats some images and even words from the poem (tears and sighs, sickness), but rearranges them in a completely new and original a narrative. The novel however overturns all our expectations. Only twice Chopin is mentioned as a creator of the passionate and impulsive style (imitated in the poem and described in the essay). Every other occasion to invoke Chopin is used in an entirely ironic context, as a pretext for the comical conflict between two Mmes de Cambremer, while all the “Chopin” images are still present in this travestied version. Our analysis of the Proust’s Chopin theme allows us to explain why creating an original literary incarnation of music was made possible for the novelist only by denying poetry.

Keywords: Marcel Proust, French literature, Chopin, poetry, modernist novel

Bibliography:

Levik V. Izbrannye perevody: V 2 t. M., 2007. T. 1.

Proust M. V storonu Svana. SPb., 2000.

Proust M. Portrety hudozhnikov i muzykantov. SPb.; M., 2001.

Proust M. Protiv Sent-Beva: Statyi i esse. M., 1999.

Proust M. Sodom i Gomorra. M., 2007.

Taganov A. N. Formirovanie hudozhestvennoj sistemy M. Prusta i francuzskaja literatura na rubezhe XIX–XX vekov. Ivanovo, 1993.

Francuzskaja pojezija v perevodah Natal'i Strizhevskoj. M., 2008.

Bales R. Cambridge Companion to Proust. Cambridge, 2001.

Barthes R. La préparation du roman. Paris, 2003. Vol. 1.

Baudelaire Ch. OEuvres complètes. Paris, 1975.

Daum P. Les Plaisirs et les Jours, de Marcel Proust, étude d’un recueil. Paris, 1993.

Duval S. Ironie, humour et «réminiscences anticipées»: la construction des dames de Cambremer et l'histoire de l'art selon Proust // Revue d'histoire littéraire de la France, 2006/3 (Vol. 106). URL: http://www.cairn.info/revue-dhistoire-litteraire-de-la-france-2006-3-page-667.htm (дата обращения 10.06.2017).

Kristeva J. Le Temps sensible. Proust et l'expérience littéraire. Paris, 1994.

Milly J. La phrase de Proust : des phrases de Bergotte aux phrases de Vinteuil. Paris, 1983.

Nectoux J.-M. Chopin ou le temps retrouvé // Frédéric Chopin: Interprétations. Paris, 2005. P. 173–194.

Proust M. Contre Sainte-Beuve précédé de Pastiches et mélanges et suivi d'Essais et articles. Paris, 1971.

Proust M. À la recherche du temps perdu. Paris, 1987–1989.

Proust M. Les Plaisirs et les jours, suivi de L’Indifferent. Paris, 1993.

Samson J. Chopin reception history: theory, history, analysis // Chopin Studies 2. Cambridge, 2006. P. 1–17.

Schmid M. Proust dans la décadence. Paris, 2008.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology