Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Monuments of Folklore Siberian Journal of Philology Critique and Semiotics
Yazyki i fol’klor korennykh narodov Sibiri Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya
Institute of Philology of
the Siberian Branch of
Russian Academy of Sciences
По-русски
DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737
Roskomnadzor certificate number Эл № ФС 77-84784 
Critique and Semiotics
По-русски
Archive
Submission requirements
Process for Submission and Publication
Editor′s office
Editorial Board and Editorial Council
Our ethical principles
Search:


Email: silantev@post.nsu.ru

Article

Name: Zoösemiotics and Anthroposemiotics

Authors: Deely, John

Saint Vincent College in Latrobe, Pennsylvania

Issue 1, 2017Pages 140-188
UDK: 81’22DOI:

Abstract: The paper addresses the meanings of the notion parrhesia (the courage of truth), as well as how it is related to the concept epimeleia heautou, or care of the self explored in Paul-Michel Foucault’s final course lectured by him in the Collège de France in 1981–1984. The author refers to the interpretation of Foucault’s views by the contemporary scholar from Verona. According to Bernini’s interpretation, Foucault’s interest in parrhesia was caused by his disappointment in the ethics of the care of the self. As Lorenzo Bernini says: In The Hermeneutics of the Subject Foucault had to admit, in spite of himself, that in the Hellenistic Age and in the Roman Imperial period the “culture of the self” froze into a universal normative morality that disclosed the Christian hermeneutic of desire and thus modern subjectivity. In the lectures at the Collège de France of the following years, he sought after the origins of an alternative tradition to which, he supposed, both the Enlightenment and his own critical attitude belonged; and he found it not in cura sui but in parrhesìa. In this way, Foucault abandoned the hypothesis that different historical systems of thought are incommensurable, and he ascertained that from the beginning – at least in the Western tradition – subjectivity is compelled to make a choice between an epistemic and an ethical approach to truth, between the will to knowledge and the will to freedom. In so doing, he opened a new field of research, which this conference contributes to promote and develop further. Although, one cannot discover any substantiation for this interpretation in the Foucault’s texts. The care of the self and courage of truth emerge not as alternatives in his works but rather tightly intertwined notions and interdependent strategies for building up subjectivity. The two different ways for the care of the self problem statement in Alcibiades I and Laches (what L. Bernini pointed out) do not indicate at the alternative of the care of the self and courage of truth. Quite the opposite, M. Foucault attempts to show that in the Laches where the primary concern for the care of the self is bios, parrhesia is immediately involved: bios acts both as the subject of the care of the self and continuous topic of Socrates’ parrheisiastic speech. Namely, this sphere (life style, how we conduct our lives, care of the self) makes the primary space for parrheisiastic practices, intelligible in its ethic per se and political meaning. Paul-Michel Foucalt stresses that he is interested not so much in the political as, peculiarly, in ethic parrhesia, which attracts him as the space and practice for constituting oneself and genuine care of the self.

Keywords: zoösemiotics, anthroposemiotics, semiosis, Umwelt, Innenwelt, Lebenswelt, species-specific, sign, code, idea, textuality, criticism

Bibliography:

Anderson M., Deely J., Krampen M., Ransdell J., Sebeok Th. A., Uexküll Th. von. A Semiotic Perspective on the Sciences: Steps Toward a New Paradigm. Toronto Semiotic Circle Working Paper, 1984.

Bakhtin M. Problemy poetiki Dostoevskogo. Moscow, 1963 // Theory and History of Literature Series. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1984. Vol. 8.

Bakhtin M. From Notes Made in 1970–1971, the section “Iz zapisej 1970–71 godov”, pp. 336–360 // Bakhtin M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva. Moscow, 1979 / trans. by Vern W. McGee as Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, ed. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 1986. P. 132–158.

Bakhtin M. Voprosy literatury i estetiki. Moscow, 1975 / trans. by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist as The Dialogic Imagination; Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin, ed. Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981.

Bargatzky W. Das Universum Lebt: Die Aufsehenerregende Hypothese vom Organischen Aufbau des Weltalls. Munich: Wilhelm Heyne Verlag, 1978.

Barthes R. Élements de Sémiologie. Paris: Seuil, 1964 / trans. by Annette Lavers and Colin Smith as Elements of Semiology. New York: Hill and Wang, 1967.

Barthes R. S/Z. Paris: Seuil, 1970 / trans. with title unchanged Richard Miller. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1974.

Cajetan Th. de V. Commentaria in summam theologicam. Prima pars (Rome, 1507), reprinted in Sancti Thomae Aquinatis Doctoris Angelici Opera Omnia, vols. 4 and 5. Rome: Leonine, 1888–1889.

Caputo J. Radical Hermeneutics. Repetition, Deconstruction, and the Hermeneutic Project. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1987.

Carleton Th. C. De Signo, Logica, Disp. 42 // Carleton Th. C. Philosophia Universalis. Antwerp, 1649.

Chomsky N. Language and Mind. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World, 1968.

Con Davis R. The Case for a Post-Structuralist Mimesis: John Barth and Imitation // The American Journal of Semiotics 3.3, 1985. P. 49–72.

Culler J. Ferdinand de Saussure. New York: Penguin, 1977.

Culler J. The Pursuit of Signs. Semiotics, Literature, Deconstruction. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1981.

Culler J. On Deconstruction. Theory and Criticism after Structuralism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1982.

Danow D. Text and Subtext // Semiotics 1987 / ed. John Deely. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1988.

Deely J. Introducing Semiotic: Its History and Doctrine. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1982.

Deely J. Editorial Afterword to Tractatus de Signis: The Semiotic of John Poinsot. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985. P. 391–514.

Deely J. Semiotic as Framework and Direction, 1984 / Deely, Kruse, and Williams, eds., 1986. P. 264–271.

Deely J. John Locke’s Place in the History of Semiotic Inquiry // Semiotics. 1986а / ed. Jonathan Evans and John Deely. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1987. P. 406–418.

Deely J. Doctrine, terminological entry for the Encyclopedic Dictionary of Semiotics / ed. Thomas A. Sebeok et al. Berlin: Mouton, 1986b.Tome I. P. 214.

Deely J. 1986c The Coalescence of Semiotic Consciousness // Deely, Williams, and Kruse, 1986: 5–34.

Deely J. 1986d. Idolum. Archeology and Ontology of the Iconic Sign // Iconicity: Essays on the Nature of Culture, Festschrift volume in honor of Thomas A. Sebeok, edited by Paul Bouissac, Michael Herzfeld, and Roland Posner. Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag, 1986. P. 29–49.

Deely J. On the Problem of Interpreting the Term `First’ in the Expression `First Philosophy’ // Semiotics 1987 / ed. J. Deely. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1987. P. 3–14.

Deely J. The Semiotic of John Poinsot: Yesterday and Tomorrow, major discussion of reviews of and theoretical issues in the 1631–1632 work of Poinsot // Semiotica 69. 1/2 (April), 1988. P. 31–127.

Deely J. 1988a. The Subject Matter of Semiotic Inquiry // Semiotics 1988 / ed. Terry Prewitt John Deely, and Karen Haworth. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1989. P. 133–142.

Deely J. How Does Semiosis Effect Renvoi?, el Thomas A. Sebeok Fellowship Inaugural Lecture, presentada en la 18ava. Reunión Anual de la Semiotic Society of America en St. Louis el Viernes, 22 Octubre 1993a, que sera publicada en The American Journal of Semiotics, perro ja publicado como el Capítulo 8 de Deely 1994a: P. 201–244.

Deely J. Four Ages of Understanding. The first postmodern survey of philosophy from ancient times to the turn of the twenty-first century. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press, 2001.

Deely J. A sign is what?, a dialogue between a semiotician and a would-be realist // Sign Systems Studies 29.2, 2001a. P. 705–743.

Descartes R. 1637. Discourse on the Method of Rightly Conducting the Reason and Seeking for Truth in the Sciences / trans. Elizabeth S. Haldane and G. R. T. Gross // The Philosophical Works of Descartes (corrected reprint edition); New York: Dover, 1955, I. P. 79–130.

Descartes R. 1641. Meditations on First Philosophy / trans. Elizabeth S. Haldane and G. R. T. Gross // The Philosophical Works of Descartes (corrected reprint edition); New York: Dover, 1955, I. P. 131–199.

Eco U. O Signo / trans. into Portuguese by Maria de Fatima Marinho. 3a ed.; Lisbon: Editorial Presença of Segno. Milan: Istituto Editoriale Internazionale, 1973.

Eco U. A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1976.

Eco U. The Code: Metaphor or Interdisciplinary Category? // Yale Italian Studies 1.1 (Winter), 1977. P. 24–52.

Eco U. Proposals for a History of Semiotics // Semiotics Unfolding / ed. Tasso Borbé. Berlin: Mouton, 1979. P. 75–89.

Gibson J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1979.

Gould S. J., Vrba E. S. Exaptation – A Missing Term in the Science of Form // Paleobiology 8.1 (Winter), 1982. P. 4–15.

Hall E. T. Beyond Culture. New York: Doubleday & Company, 1976.

Hawkes T. Structuralism and Semiotics. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977.

Hjelsmslev L. Prolegomena to a Theory of Language, being the second, revised translation by Francis J. Whitfield of Omkring sprogteoriens grundlæggelse (Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard, 1943), incorporating “several minor corrections and changes that have suggested themselves in the course of discussions between the author and the translator” (Hjelmslev and Whitfield 1961, page v of this volume).

Jacob F. The Possible and the Actual. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1982.

Jakobson R. Coup d’oeil sur le devéloppement de la sémiotique // Panorama Sémiotique / A Semiotic Landscape / ed. Seymour Chatman, Umberto Eco, and Jean-Marie Klinkenberg / Proceedings of the International Association for Semiotic Studies. Milan, June 1974; The Hague: Mouton, P. 3–18.

Johansen J. D. Sign Concept, Meaning, and the Study of Literature // Semiotics 1982 / ed. John Deely and Jonathan Evans. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1987. P. 473–482.

Johansen J. D. Prolegomena to a Semiotic Theory of Text Interpretation // Semiotica 57.3/4, 1985. P. 225–288.

Jameson F. The Prison House of Language: A Critical Account of Structuralism and Russian Formalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1972.

King T. Text and Object: Distinguishing Them as Interpretations // Semiotics 1987. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1988. P. 99–106.

Locke J. An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding. London: Thomas Bassett, 1690 // Deely, Williams, and Kruse 1986. P. 2–4.

Lovelock J. E. Gaia as Seen through the Atmosphere // Atmosphere and Environment 6, 1972. P. 579–580.

Lovelock J. E. Gaia. A New Look at Life on Earth. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 1979.

Lovelock J. E. The Ages of Gaia: A Biography of Our Living Earth. New York: W. W. Norton, 1988.

Maritain J. Language and the Theory of Sign, 1957 // Deely et al. 1986: 51– 62.

Maritain J. Notebooks, Chapter 3, 1964 / translated by Joseph W. Evans; New York: Albany, 1984. P. 81–99.

Merrell F. An Uncertain Semiotic // The Current in Criticism. Essays on the Present and Future of Literary Theory / ed. Clayton Koelb and Virgil Lokke. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press, 1988. P. 243–264.

Morgan Th. Is There an Intertext in This Text: Literary and Interdisciplinary Approaches to Intertextuality // The American Journal of Semiotics 3.4, 1985. P. 1–40.

Morris Ch. Signs, Language and Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall, 1946.; reprinted complete in Charles Morris, Writings on the General Theory of Signs, ed. Thomas A. Sebeok. Approaches to Semiotics 16; The Hague: Mouton, 1971. P. 73–397.

Peirce Ch. S. c.1902. Ms. 599, Reason’s Rules (Robin p. 74), partially included in CP 5.538–545.

Peirce Ch. S. c.1902a. Minute Logic, draft for a book complete consecitively only to Chapter 4. Published in CP in extracts scattered over six of the eight volumes, including 1.203-283, 1.575-584; 2.1-202, 2.757n1; 4.227-323; 6.349- 352; 7.279, 7.374n10, 7.362-387 except 381n19. (For fuller detail, see Burks 293–294).

Peirce Ch. S. 1903. Lowell Lectures, Some Topics of Logic Bearing on Questions Now Vexed, esp.: lect. IIIA, Lessons from the History of Philosophy, CP 1.15-26; draft 3 of lect. 3 entitled Degenerate Cases in CP 1.521-544; lect. 8, How To Theorize, CP 5.590-604 (Burks p. 295); and the section published in CP 4.510–529 under the title The Gamma Part of Existential Graphs.

Peirce Ch. S. 1906, March 9. 52-page draft letter to Lady Welby (under Robin L463, p. 200), ms. pp. 24–30 excerpted in Hardwick 1977: 195–201.

Poinsot J. Artis Logicae Secunda Pars. Alcalá, Spain, 1632. From R I: 249– 839.

Poinsot J. 9 July 1589 – 1644 June 17. 1632a. Tractatus de Signis, subtitled The Semiotic of John Poinsot, extracted from the Artis Logicae Prima et Secunda Pars of 1631–1632 (above two entries) and arranged in bilingual format by John Deely in consultation with Ralph A. Powell. First Edition; Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985.

Ricoeur P. Hermeneutics & the Human Sciences / ed. and trans. John B. Thompson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.

Russel A. F. 1982. The Semiosis Linking Human World and Physical Reality // Semiotics 1982. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1987. P. 591– 600.

Saussure F. de. i.1906–1911. Lectures delivered at the University of Geneva and published from auditors’ notes by Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye with the collaboration of Albert Riedlinger under the title Cours de Linguistique Generale in 1916; critical edition prepared by Tullio de Mauro. Paris: Payot, 1972.

Scholes R. Semiotics and Interpretation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1982.

Sebeok Th. A. 1976. Foreword (pp. ix-xiii) to original publication of Sebeok 1985 following.

Sebeok Th. A. Ecumenicalism in Semiotics // A Perfusion of Signs / ed. Thomas A. Sebeok. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1977. P. 180-206.

Sebeok Th. A. 9 November 1920–2001 December 21. Vital Signs, Presidential Address delivered October 12 to the ninth Annual Meeting of the Semiotic Society of America, Bloomington, Indiana, October 11–14 1984a.

Sebeok Th. A. Signs of Life // International Semiotic Spectrum 2. June 1984b, 1–2.

Sebeok Th. A. Semiotics in the United States, introduction to American Signatures. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1989.

Todorov T. Mikhail Bakhtin: The Dialogical Principle. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1984 / English trans. by Wlad Godzich from the French original, Mikhail Bakhtine: Le Principe Dialogique Suivi de Écrits da Cercle de Bakhtine. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1981.

Toulmin S. The Construal of Reality: Criticism in Modern and Postmodern Science // The Politics of Interpretation, ed. W. J. T. Mitchell. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1982.

Uexküll J. von. Kompositionslehre der Natur. Biologie als undogmatische Naturwissenschaft, selected writings edited and with an introduction by T. von Uexküll. Frankfurt a. M.: Ullstein, 1899–1940.

Volosinov V. N. Marksism i filosofiia iazyka. Osnovnye problemy sotsiologicheskogo metoda v nauke o iazyke, 1929 / translated by Ladislav Matejka and I. R. Titunik as Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. New York: Seminar Press, 1973.

Williams B. What Has History To Do with Semiotic? // Semiotica 54.1/2; preprinted in revised monograph form with index and historically layered bibliography under the title History and Semiotic. Victoria College of the University of Toronto: Toronto Semiotic Circle Number 4, Summer 1985.

Williams B., Pencak W. (Guest Editors). Special Issue: History and Semiotics // Semiotica, 1991. 83-3/4.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology